Suppr超能文献

对基层医疗医生进行甲型肝炎主动监测的效益成本分析。

Benefit-cost analysis of active surveillance of primary care physicians for hepatitis A.

作者信息

Hinds M W, Skaggs J W, Bergeisen G H

出版信息

Am J Public Health. 1985 Feb;75(2):176-7. doi: 10.2105/ajph.75.2.176.

Abstract

We identified two random samples of 216 primary care physicians each. In one sample, we made weekly telephone contact for active hepatitis A (HA) surveillance; in the other, we made no such contact (passive surveillance). Appropriate county health departments were notified whenever we identified a HA case by active surveillance. Active surveillance was associated with a 2.8-fold increase in reported HA cases compared to passive surveillance. The estimated benefit: cost ratio active/passive surveillance was 2.5:1.

摘要

我们识别出了两个各有216名初级保健医生的随机样本。在其中一个样本中,我们每周进行电话联系以开展甲型肝炎(HA)主动监测;在另一个样本中,我们不进行此类联系(被动监测)。每当我们通过主动监测识别出HA病例时,都会通知相应的县卫生部门。与被动监测相比,主动监测使报告的HA病例增加了2.8倍。主动监测与被动监测的估计效益成本比为2.5:1。

相似文献

7
Postcard from New Zealand.来自新西兰的明信片。
Perspect Public Health. 2012 Sep;132(5):204. doi: 10.1177/1757913912457306.

引用本文的文献

3
Evaluation of a national surveillance unit.一个国家监测单位的评估。
Arch Dis Child. 1999 Jan;80(1):21-7. doi: 10.1136/adc.80.1.21.

本文引用的文献

7
The reporting of communicable diseases.传染病报告
Am J Epidemiol. 1977 Jun;105(6):587-90. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a112424.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验