School of Health and Rehabilitation Sciences, The University of Queensland, Therapies Annex, 84a Services Rd, St Lucia, Brisbane, QLD, 4067, Australia.
Melbourne School of Psychological Sciences, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.
Curr Oncol Rep. 2024 Nov;26(11):1293-1320. doi: 10.1007/s11912-024-01586-7. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
Gynecological malignancies are prevalent in females, and this population is likely to experience symptoms of pelvic floor disorders and sexual dysfunction. Non-surgical, non-pharmaceutical conservative therapies, namely pelvic floor muscle (PFM) therapies and education-based interventions, could be beneficial for this population. The purpose of this systematic review was to examine the evidence regarding their effectiveness on bladder, bowel, vaginal, sexual, psychological function, quality of life, and PFM function in gynecological cancer populations.
Six databases were searched to identify studies employing any interventional study design, except case studies, to investigate the effect of PFM therapies, education-based interventions, or combined therapies on any outcome of interest. The search yielded 4467 results, from which 20 studies were included. Of these, 11 (55%) were RCTs, two (10%) were non-RCTs with two groups, and seven (35%) were non-RCTs with a single group. Findings suggest that combined (multimodal) therapies, specifically PFM (active > passive) + education therapies, appear more effective for vaginal, overall pelvic floor, sexual, and PFM function. PFM therapies (active and/or electrostimulation) may improve bladder outcomes. Limited evidence suggests PFM (active) + education therapies may improve bowel function. Conservative therapies may improve psychological function, although available data do not appear to favor a particular therapy. Given the conflicting findings regarding quality of life, no clear conclusions can be made. Interpretation of findings highlighted the importance of intervention dosage, adherence, and supervision for optimal effectiveness. Despite the limitations of the included studies, this review provides new and valuable insights for future research and clinical practice.
妇科恶性肿瘤在女性中较为常见,这类人群可能会出现盆底功能障碍和性功能障碍的症状。非手术、非药物的保守治疗方法,即盆底肌肉(PFM)治疗和基于教育的干预措施,可能对这类人群有益。本系统综述的目的是研究这些方法对妇科癌症患者的膀胱、肠道、阴道、性功能、心理功能、生活质量以及 PFM 功能的有效性证据。
检索了 6 个数据库,以确定采用任何干预性研究设计(除病例研究外)的研究,以调查 PFM 治疗、基于教育的干预或联合治疗对任何感兴趣结局的影响。搜索结果产生了 4467 项结果,其中纳入了 20 项研究。其中,11 项(55%)为 RCT,2 项(10%)为无 RCT 的 2 组研究,7 项(35%)为无 RCT 的单组研究。结果表明,联合(多模式)治疗,特别是 PFM(主动>被动)+教育治疗,对阴道、整体盆底、性功能和 PFM 功能更有效。PFM 治疗(主动和/或电刺激)可能改善膀胱结局。有限的证据表明,PFM(主动)+教育治疗可能改善肠道功能。保守治疗可能改善心理功能,但现有数据似乎并不支持特定的治疗方法。鉴于生活质量的结果存在矛盾,无法得出明确的结论。对研究结果的解释强调了干预剂量、依从性和监督对最佳效果的重要性。尽管纳入研究存在局限性,但本综述为未来的研究和临床实践提供了新的有价值的见解。