• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

免疫肿瘤学健康技术评估中治疗效果的衰减:对假设和支持证据的回顾,并提出指导建模的建议。

Treatment Effect Waning in Immuno-oncology Health Technology Assessments: A Review of Assumptions and Supporting Evidence with Proposals to Guide Modelling.

机构信息

Delta Hat Limited, Nottingham, UK.

Sheffield Centre for Health and Related Research, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, UK.

出版信息

Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 Nov;42(11):1181-1196. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01423-6. Epub 2024 Aug 23.

DOI:10.1007/s40273-024-01423-6
PMID:39177877
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11499331/
Abstract

Treatment effect waning (TEW) refers to the attenuation of treatment effects over time. Assumptions of a sustained immuno-oncologic treatment effect have been a source of contention in health technology assessment (HTA). We review how TEW has been addressed in HTA and in the wider scientific literature. We analysed company submissions to English language HTA agencies and summarised methods and assumptions used. We subsequently reviewed TEW-related work in the ISPOR Scientific Presentations Database and conducted a targeted literature review (TLR) for evidence of the maintenance of immuno-oncology (IO) treatment effects post-treatment discontinuation. We found no standardised approach adopted by companies in submissions to HTA agencies, with immediate TEW most used in scenario analyses. Independently fitted survival models do however suggest TEW may often be implicitly modelled. Materials in the ISPOR scientific database suggest gradual TEW is more plausible than immediate TEW. The TLR uncovered evidence of durable survival in patients treated with IOs but no evidence that directly addresses the presence or absence of TEW. Our HTA review shows the need for a consistent and appropriate implementation of TEW in oncology appraisals. However, the TLR highlights the absence of direct evidence on TEW in literature, as TEW is defined in terms of relative treatment effects-not absolute survival. We propose a sequence of steps for analysts to use when assessing whether a TEW scenario is necessary and appropriate to present in appraisals of IOs.

摘要

治疗效果衰减(Treatment Effect Waning,TEW)是指治疗效果随时间的推移而减弱。在健康技术评估(Health Technology Assessment,HTA)中,持续的免疫肿瘤学治疗效果假设一直存在争议。我们回顾了 TEW 在 HTA 中的应用以及更广泛的科学文献中的处理方式。我们分析了向英语 HTA 机构提交的公司报告,并总结了所使用的方法和假设。随后,我们在 ISPOR 科学报告数据库中审查了与 TEW 相关的工作,并进行了有针对性的文献综述(TLR),以寻找治疗后免疫肿瘤学(IO)治疗效果持续存在的证据。我们发现,公司在向 HTA 机构提交报告时并未采用标准化方法,即时 TEW 最常用于情景分析。然而,独立拟合的生存模型表明,TEW 可能经常被隐含建模。ISPOR 科学数据库中的材料表明,逐渐的 TEW 比即时 TEW 更有可能。TLR 发现了接受 IO 治疗的患者中有持久生存的证据,但没有直接证明 TEW 是否存在。我们的 HTA 综述表明,需要在肿瘤评估中一致且适当地实施 TEW。然而,TLR 强调了文献中缺乏关于 TEW 的直接证据,因为 TEW 是根据相对治疗效果来定义的,而不是绝对的生存。我们提出了一个分析师在评估是否需要在 IO 评估中呈现 TEW 情景以及该情景是否合适的步骤序列。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8b4/11499331/bddd8df0d267/40273_2024_1423_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8b4/11499331/6f40228d6d9b/40273_2024_1423_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8b4/11499331/bddd8df0d267/40273_2024_1423_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8b4/11499331/6f40228d6d9b/40273_2024_1423_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f8b4/11499331/bddd8df0d267/40273_2024_1423_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Treatment Effect Waning in Immuno-oncology Health Technology Assessments: A Review of Assumptions and Supporting Evidence with Proposals to Guide Modelling.免疫肿瘤学健康技术评估中治疗效果的衰减:对假设和支持证据的回顾,并提出指导建模的建议。
Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 Nov;42(11):1181-1196. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01423-6. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
2
Treatment Effect Waning Assumptions: A Review of National Institute of Health and Care Excellence Technology Appraisals.治疗效果衰减假设:国家卫生与保健卓越研究所技术评估综述。
Value Health. 2024 Aug;27(8):1003-1011. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.04.016. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
3
Current challenges for assessing the long-term clinical benefit of cancer immunotherapy: a multi-stakeholder perspective.评估癌症免疫疗法长期临床获益的当前挑战:多利益相关者视角。
J Immunother Cancer. 2020 Jul;8(2). doi: 10.1136/jitc-2020-000648.
4
Appraisals by Health Technology Assessment Agencies of Economic Evaluations Submitted as Part of Reimbursement Dossiers for Oncology Treatments: Evidence from Canada, the UK, and Australia.卫生技术评估机构对肿瘤治疗报销文件中提交的经济评估的评价:来自加拿大、英国和澳大利亚的证据。
Curr Oncol. 2022 Oct 13;29(10):7624-7636. doi: 10.3390/curroncol29100602.
5
How Do Pharmaceutical Companies Model Survival of Cancer Patients? A Review of NICE Single Technology Appraisals in 2017.制药公司如何对癌症患者的生存情况进行建模?对 2017 年 NICE 单一技术评估的回顾。
Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2019 Jan;35(2):160-167. doi: 10.1017/S0266462319000175.
6
Avoiding and identifying errors in health technology assessment models: qualitative study and methodological review.避免和识别健康技术评估模型中的错误:定性研究和方法学综述。
Health Technol Assess. 2010 May;14(25):iii-iv, ix-xii, 1-107. doi: 10.3310/hta14250.
7
Informative value of Patient Reported Outcomes (PRO) in Health Technology Assessment (HTA).患者报告结局(PRO)在卫生技术评估(HTA)中的信息价值。
GMS Health Technol Assess. 2011 Feb 2;7:Doc01. doi: 10.3205/hta000092.
8
Justifying the source of external comparators in single-arm oncology health technology submissions: a review of NICE and PBAC assessments. justifies 外部对照在单臂肿瘤学卫生技术提交中的来源:对 NICE 和 PBAC 评估的审查。
J Comp Eff Res. 2024 Feb;13(2):e230140. doi: 10.57264/cer-2023-0140. Epub 2024 Jan 4.
9
ImmunoCAP® ISAC and Microtest for multiplex allergen testing in people with difficult to manage allergic disease: a systematic review and cost analysis.ImmunoCAP® ISAC和微量试验用于难治性过敏性疾病患者的多重过敏原检测:系统评价与成本分析
Health Technol Assess. 2016 Sep;20(67):1-178. doi: 10.3310/hta20670.
10
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.

引用本文的文献

1
An Evaluation of an Algorithm for the Selection of Flexible Survival Models for Cancer Immunotherapies: Pass or Fail?一种用于选择癌症免疫疗法中灵活生存模型的算法评估:通过还是失败?
Pharmacoeconomics. 2024 Dec;42(12):1395-1412. doi: 10.1007/s40273-024-01429-0. Epub 2024 Sep 20.

本文引用的文献

1
Treatment Effect Waning Assumptions: A Review of National Institute of Health and Care Excellence Technology Appraisals.治疗效果衰减假设:国家卫生与保健卓越研究所技术评估综述。
Value Health. 2024 Aug;27(8):1003-1011. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2024.04.016. Epub 2024 Apr 26.
2
Beyond the 5-year milestone: Long-term survivorship of melanoma patients treated off-trial with anti-PD-1.超越 5 年里程碑:接受抗 PD-1 试验外治疗的黑色素瘤患者的长期生存情况。
Pigment Cell Melanoma Res. 2023 May-Jul;36(3-4):314-320. doi: 10.1111/pcmr.13083. Epub 2023 Apr 11.
3
Durability of response to immune checkpoint inhibitors in metastatic Merkel cell carcinoma after treatment cessation.
免疫检查点抑制剂治疗停止后转移性 Merkel 细胞癌对免疫检查点抑制剂反应的持久性。
Eur J Cancer. 2023 Apr;183:109-118. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2023.01.016. Epub 2023 Jan 30.
4
Long-term survival with first-line nivolumab plus ipilimumab in patients with advanced non-small-cell lung cancer: a pooled analysis.一线纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹木单抗治疗晚期非小细胞肺癌患者的长期生存:一项汇总分析。
Ann Oncol. 2023 Feb;34(2):173-185. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2022.11.006. Epub 2022 Nov 19.
5
Checkpoint Inhibitors Immunotherapy in Metastatic Melanoma: When to Stop Treatment?转移性黑色素瘤中的检查点抑制剂免疫疗法:何时停止治疗?
Biomedicines. 2022 Sep 28;10(10):2424. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10102424.
6
Five-Year Survival Outcomes With Nivolumab Plus Ipilimumab Versus Chemotherapy as First-Line Treatment for Metastatic Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer in CheckMate 227.纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹单抗对比化疗作为一线治疗用于 CheckMate 227 研究转移性非小细胞肺癌的 5 年生存结果。
J Clin Oncol. 2023 Feb 20;41(6):1200-1212. doi: 10.1200/JCO.22.01503. Epub 2022 Oct 12.
7
Nivolumab drug holiday in patients treated for metastatic renal cell carcinoma: A real-world, single-centre experience.纳武利尤单抗治疗转移性肾细胞癌患者的药物假期:一项真实世界、单中心经验。
Front Oncol. 2022 Aug 12;12:960751. doi: 10.3389/fonc.2022.960751. eCollection 2022.
8
Discontinuation of pembrolizumab for advanced urothelial carcinoma without disease progression: Nationwide cohort study.帕博利珠单抗治疗晚期尿路上皮癌停药后未发生疾病进展:全国队列研究。
Cancer Med. 2023 Feb;12(3):2325-2332. doi: 10.1002/cam4.5057. Epub 2022 Jul 21.
9
Five-year Follow-up of Patients With Head and Neck Cancer Treated With Nivolumab and Long-term Responders for Over Two Years.头颈部癌症患者接受纳武利尤单抗治疗的 5 年随访结果:2 年以上的长期缓解者。
In Vivo. 2022 Jul-Aug;36(4):1881-1886. doi: 10.21873/invivo.12907.
10
Conditional survival and long-term efficacy with nivolumab plus ipilimumab versus sunitinib in patients with advanced renal cell carcinoma.纳武利尤单抗联合伊匹单抗对比舒尼替尼治疗晚期肾细胞癌患者的条件生存和长期疗效。
Cancer. 2022 Jun 1;128(11):2085-2097. doi: 10.1002/cncr.34180. Epub 2022 Apr 5.