• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

成人腹股沟疝住院费用分析:基于分位数回归模型。

Analysis of hospitalization costs in adult inguinal hernia: based on quantile regression model.

机构信息

Department of Hernia and Abdominal Wall Surgery, Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Number 5 Jingyuan Road, Shijingshan District, Beijing, 100043, China.

Beijing Chaoyang Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.

出版信息

Hernia. 2024 Oct;28(5):1969-1978. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03138-1. Epub 2024 Aug 23.

DOI:10.1007/s10029-024-03138-1
PMID:39177913
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Inguinal hernia repair is a common surgical procedure with significant variability in hospitalization costs. Traditional cost analysis methods often overlook the distribution of costs across patient demographics and clinical factors. This study employs a quantile regression model to explore the determinants of hospitalization costs for adult inguinal hernia surgery, providing a detailed understanding of cost variations across different quantiles.

METHODS

We analyzed data from adult patients who underwent inguinal hernia surgery at Beijing Chaoyang Hospital from January 2015 to June 2023. The study included patient demographics, hernia-related information, surgery-related details, and cost-related data. A quantile regression model was used to assess the impact of various factors on hospitalization costs at different quantiles (10%, 20%, 30%, 40%, 50%, 60%, 70%, 80%, 90%). Data were processed using StataSE 15.0 software.

RESULTS

Our study included 16,602 patients, predominantly male (91.86%) and Han Chinese (96.48%), with the 51-64 years age group being the largest (26.80%). The quantile regression analysis revealed significant cost variations across different quantiles. Younger patients incurred higher costs, with age coefficients ranging from -40.541 at the 90th quantile to -3.082 at the 10th quantile. Uninsured patients faced higher costs, with coefficients from 214.747 at the 80th quantile to 501.78 at the 10th quantile. Longer hospital stays correlated with increased costs, with coefficients from 342.15 at the 80th quantile to 405.613 at the 90th quantile. Patients hospitalized multiple times (≥3) had lower costs, with coefficients from -767.353 at the 40th quantile to -311.575 at the 80th quantile. Comorbidities significantly raised costs, with coefficients for three or more comorbidities ranging from 806.122 at the 80th quantile to 1,456.02 at the 40th quantile. Laparoscopic surgery was more expensive than open surgery, with coefficients from 1,834.206 at the 80th quantile to 2,805.281 at the 10th quantile. Bilateral surgeries and the use of biological mesh also resulted in higher costs, with coefficients for bilateral surgeries ranging from 1,067.708 at the 10th quantile to 2,871.126 at the 90th quantile and for biological mesh from 3,221.216 at the 40th quantile to 6,117.598 at the 90th quantile.

CONCLUSIONS

Hospitalization costs for inguinal hernia surgery are influenced by multiple factors, with significant variations across different patient groups. Strategies to control costs should be tailored to address the specific needs of patients, optimize surgical methods, and improve perioperative care. Future research should extend these findings across different healthcare settings and consider the latest advancements in medical technology and policy changes.

摘要

背景

腹股沟疝修补术是一种常见的外科手术,其住院费用存在显著差异。传统的成本分析方法往往忽略了成本在患者人口统计学和临床因素中的分布。本研究采用分位数回归模型探讨成人腹股沟疝手术住院费用的决定因素,详细了解不同分位数的成本变化。

方法

我们分析了 2015 年 1 月至 2023 年 6 月在北京朝阳医院接受腹股沟疝手术的成年患者数据。研究包括患者人口统计学、疝相关信息、手术相关细节和成本相关数据。使用分位数回归模型评估各种因素对不同分位数(10%、20%、30%、40%、50%、60%、70%、80%、90%)住院费用的影响。使用 StataSE 15.0 软件处理数据。

结果

我们的研究纳入了 16602 名患者,主要为男性(91.86%)和汉族(96.48%),年龄最大的是 51-64 岁(26.80%)。分位数回归分析显示,不同分位数之间存在显著的成本差异。年轻患者的成本更高,年龄系数范围从第 90 分位数的-40.541 到第 10 分位数的-3.082。未参保患者的成本更高,系数范围从第 80 分位数的 214.747 到第 10 分位数的 501.78。住院时间延长与成本增加相关,系数范围从第 80 分位数的 342.15 到第 90 分位数的 405.613。多次住院(≥3 次)的患者成本较低,系数范围从第 40 分位数的-767.353 到第 80 分位数的-311.575。合并症显著增加了成本,三例及以上合并症的系数范围从第 80 分位数的 806.122 到第 40 分位数的 1456.02。腹腔镜手术比开放手术更昂贵,系数范围从第 80 分位数的 1834.206 到第 10 分位数的 2805.281。双侧手术和使用生物网片也导致成本增加,双侧手术的系数范围从第 10 分位数的 1067.708 到第 90 分位数的 2871.126,生物网片的系数范围从第 40 分位数的 3221.216 到第 90 分位数的 6117.598。

结论

腹股沟疝手术的住院费用受多种因素影响,不同患者群体之间存在显著差异。控制成本的策略应根据患者的具体需求进行定制,优化手术方法,并改善围手术期护理。未来的研究应在不同的医疗保健环境中扩展这些发现,并考虑医疗技术的最新进展和政策变化。

相似文献

1
Analysis of hospitalization costs in adult inguinal hernia: based on quantile regression model.成人腹股沟疝住院费用分析:基于分位数回归模型。
Hernia. 2024 Oct;28(5):1969-1978. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03138-1. Epub 2024 Aug 23.
2
Comparison of hospital costs and length of stay associated with open-mesh, totally extraperitoneal inguinal hernia repair, and transabdominal preperitoneal inguinal hernia repair: an analysis of observational data using propensity score matching.比较开放式网片全腹膜外腹股沟疝修补术与经腹腹膜前腹股沟疝修补术的住院费用和住院时间:基于倾向性评分匹配的观察性数据分析。
Surg Endosc. 2013 Apr;27(4):1326-33. doi: 10.1007/s00464-012-2608-6. Epub 2012 Oct 24.
3
International guidelines for groin hernia management.腹股沟疝治疗的国际指南。
Hernia. 2018 Feb;22(1):1-165. doi: 10.1007/s10029-017-1668-x. Epub 2018 Jan 12.
4
Impact Of Comorbidities On Outcomes And Healthcare Costs Of Open Inguinal Hernia Repair In Patients With Diabetes Mellitus.糖尿病患者开放性腹股沟疝修补术的合并症对结局和医疗保健费用的影响。
Chirurgia (Bucur). 2024 Apr;119(2):227-234. doi: 10.21614/chirurgia.2024.v.119.i.2.p.227.
5
Economic analysis of the robotic approach to inguinal hernia versus laparoscopic: is it sustainable for the healthcare system?机器人腹股沟疝手术与腹腔镜手术的经济学分析:对医疗保健系统来说是否可持续?
Hernia. 2024 Aug;28(4):1205-1214. doi: 10.1007/s10029-024-03006-y. Epub 2024 Mar 20.
6
Hospital costs associated with laparoscopic and open inguinal herniorrhaphy.与腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术和开放腹股沟疝修补术相关的医院费用。
JSLS. 2014 Oct-Dec;18(4). doi: 10.4293/JSLS.2014.00217.
7
Educating surgeons may allow for reduced intraoperative costs for inguinal herniorrhaphy.对外科医生进行培训可能会降低腹股沟疝修补术的术中成本。
J Am Coll Surg. 2015 Jun;220(6):1107-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2015.02.030. Epub 2015 Mar 14.
8
Healthcare Resource Utilization in Inguinal Hernia Repair: A Three-Year Cost Evaluation of Truven Health Marketscan Research Databases.腹股沟疝修补术中的医疗资源利用:特鲁文健康市场扫描研究数据库的三年成本评估。
J Surg Res. 2021 Aug;264:408-417. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2021.02.041. Epub 2021 Apr 10.
9
Nationwide Analysis of Inpatient Laparoscopic Versus Open Inguinal Hernia Repair.全国范围内腹腔镜与开放腹股沟疝修补术的住院患者分析。
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2020 Mar;30(3):292-298. doi: 10.1089/lap.2019.0656. Epub 2020 Jan 14.
10
Surgical management of inguinal hernias at Bugando Medical Centre in northwestern Tanzania: our experiences in a resource-limited setting.坦桑尼亚西北部布甘多医疗中心腹股沟疝的外科治疗:我们在资源有限环境中的经验
BMC Res Notes. 2012 Oct 25;5:585. doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-5-585.

引用本文的文献

1
System dynamics modeling to predict hospitalization costs in adults with inguinal hernia: a single-centre study.系统动力学建模预测成人腹股沟疝患者的住院费用:一项单中心研究。
Hernia. 2025 May 3;29(1):157. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03348-1.
2
Burden of inguinal, femoral, and abdominal hernias in India: A systematic analysis of prevalence, incidence, mortality, and DALYs from global burden of disease study 1990-2021 with projections to 2031.印度腹股沟疝、股疝和腹疝的负担:对1990 - 2021年全球疾病负担研究中的患病率、发病率、死亡率和伤残调整生命年进行系统分析,并预测至2031年。
Hernia. 2025 May 3;29(1):158. doi: 10.1007/s10029-025-03343-6.

本文引用的文献

1
A systematic review and meta-analysis of hernia sac management in laparoscopic groin hernia mesh repair: reduction or transection?腹腔镜腹股沟疝补片修补术中疝囊处理的系统评价和荟萃分析:还纳还是切断?
BMC Surg. 2023 Aug 23;23(1):249. doi: 10.1186/s12893-023-02147-8.
2
Effectiveness of 3-Day Prophylactic Negative Pressure Wound Therapy on Closed Abdominal Incisions in the Prevention of Wound Complications: A Randomized Controlled Trial.3 天预防性负压伤口治疗对预防闭合性腹部切口并发症的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
J Gastrointest Surg. 2023 Aug;27(8):1702-1709. doi: 10.1007/s11605-023-05752-3. Epub 2023 Jul 5.
3
The effect of polypharmacy on healthcare services utilization in older adults with comorbidities: a retrospective cohort study.
多药治疗对共病老年患者医疗服务利用的影响:一项回顾性队列研究。
BMC Prim Care. 2023 May 26;24(1):120. doi: 10.1186/s12875-023-02070-0.
4
The global, regional, and national burden and its trends of inguinal, femoral, and abdominal hernia from 1990 to 2019: findings from the 2019 Global Burden of Disease Study - a cross-sectional study.全球、地区和国家腹股沟疝、股疝和腹疝的负担及其趋势:2019 年全球疾病负担研究的结果——一项横断面研究。
Int J Surg. 2023 Mar 1;109(3):333-342. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000217.
5
Costs and recurrence of inguinal hernia repair in premature infants during neonatal admission.新生儿期行腹股沟疝修补术治疗早产儿的成本和复发率。
J Pediatr Surg. 2023 Mar;58(3):445-452. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2022.10.006. Epub 2022 Oct 22.
6
Major complications and mortality after ventral hernia repair: an eleven-year Swedish nationwide cohort study.腹外疝修补术后的主要并发症和死亡率:一项十一年的瑞典全国队列研究。
BMC Surg. 2022 Dec 13;22(1):426. doi: 10.1186/s12893-022-01873-9.
7
Analysis of temporal trends in robotic surgery costs using the outpatient inguinal hernia repair model.分析使用门诊腹股沟疝修补模型的机器人手术成本的时间趋势。
Surgery. 2023 Mar;173(3):718-723. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2022.06.051. Epub 2022 Oct 20.
8
Recent Technical Developments in the Field of Laparoscopic Surgery: A Literature Review.腹腔镜手术领域的近期技术进展:文献综述
Cureus. 2022 Feb 15;14(2):e22246. doi: 10.7759/cureus.22246. eCollection 2022 Feb.
9
Postoperative complications: an observational study of trends in the United States from 2012 to 2018.术后并发症:2012 年至 2018 年美国的趋势观察研究。
BMC Surg. 2021 Nov 6;21(1):393. doi: 10.1186/s12893-021-01392-z.
10
Robotic versus laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: an updated systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人与腹腔镜腹股沟疝修补术比较:更新的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Robot Surg. 2022 Aug;16(4):775-781. doi: 10.1007/s11701-021-01312-6. Epub 2021 Oct 5.