• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

英国可重复性网络开放透明研究实践调查数据集

UK Reproducibility Network open and transparent research practices survey dataset.

作者信息

Hughes-Noehrer Lukas, Aubert Bonn Noémie, De Maria Marcello, Evans Thomas Rhys, Farran Emily K, Fortunato Laura, Henderson Emma L, Jacobs Neil, Munafò Marcus R, Stewart Suzanne L K, Stewart Andrew J

机构信息

University of Manchester, Department of Computer Science, Manchester, M13 9PL, United Kingdom.

University of Reading, Department of Agri-Food Economics and Marketing, Reading, RG6 6AH, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Sci Data. 2024 Aug 23;11(1):912. doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-03786-z.

DOI:10.1038/s41597-024-03786-z
PMID:39179613
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11343877/
Abstract

Openness and transparency in the research process are a prerequisite to the production of high quality research outputs. Efforts to maximise these features have substantially accelerated in recent years, placing open and transparent research practices at the forefront of funding and related priorities, and encouraging investment in resources and infrastructure to enable such practices. Despite these efforts, there has been no systematic documentation of current practices, infrastructure, or training and resources that support open and transparent research in the UK. To address this gap, we developed and conducted the Open and Transparent Research Practices survey, a large-scale audit study completed by research-active staff in UK research institutions to better understand existing practices, needs, support, and barriers faced when implementing open and transparent research. The data presented here capture responses from over 2,500 research-active staff based at 15 institutions affiliated with the UK Reproducibility Network. The data provide a snapshot of open research practices that can be used to identify barriers, training needs, and areas that require greater investments.

摘要

研究过程中的开放性和透明度是产生高质量研究成果的前提条件。近年来,为使这些特征最大化所做的努力大幅加速,将开放透明的研究实践置于资金及相关优先事项的前沿,并鼓励对资源和基础设施进行投资以实现此类实践。尽管做出了这些努力,但对于英国支持开放透明研究的当前实践、基础设施或培训及资源,尚无系统的记录。为填补这一空白,我们开发并开展了“开放透明研究实践调查”,这是一项大规模审计研究,由英国研究机构中从事研究工作的人员完成,旨在更好地了解实施开放透明研究时的现有实践、需求、支持和面临的障碍。此处呈现的数据收集了来自英国可重复性网络下属15个机构的2500多名从事研究工作的人员的回复。这些数据提供了开放研究实践的概况,可用于识别障碍、培训需求以及需要加大投资的领域。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7351/11343877/ee510352fc26/41597_2024_3786_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7351/11343877/ee510352fc26/41597_2024_3786_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7351/11343877/ee510352fc26/41597_2024_3786_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
UK Reproducibility Network open and transparent research practices survey dataset.英国可重复性网络开放透明研究实践调查数据集
Sci Data. 2024 Aug 23;11(1):912. doi: 10.1038/s41597-024-03786-z.
2
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
3
Improving research quality: the view from the UK Reproducibility Network institutional leads for research improvement.提高研究质量:来自英国可重复性网络研究改进机构负责人的观点。
BMC Res Notes. 2021 Dec 20;14(1):458. doi: 10.1186/s13104-021-05883-3.
4
Primary Care Research Team Assessment (PCRTA): development and evaluation.基层医疗研究团队评估(PCRTA):开发与评估
Occas Pap R Coll Gen Pract. 2002 Feb(81):iii-vi, 1-72.
5
Current experience and future potential of facilitating access to digital NHS primary care services in England: the Di-Facto mixed-methods study.当前在英格兰促进获取数字国民保健服务初级保健服务的经验和未来潜力:Di-Facto 混合方法研究。
Health Soc Care Deliv Res. 2024 Sep;12(32):1-197. doi: 10.3310/JKYT5803.
6
Transparent, Open, and Reproducible Prevention Science.透明、开放、可重现的预防科学。
Prev Sci. 2022 Jul;23(5):701-722. doi: 10.1007/s11121-022-01336-w. Epub 2022 Feb 17.
7
Reforms to improve reproducibility and quality must be coordinated across the research ecosystem: the view from the UKRN Local Network Leads.为了提高可重复性和质量,必须协调整个研究生态系统的改革:来自 UKRN 地方网络负责人的观点。
BMC Res Notes. 2022 Feb 15;15(1):58. doi: 10.1186/s13104-022-05949-w.
8
Feasibility of an Audit and Feedback Intervention to Facilitate Journal Policy Change Towards Greater Promotion of Transparency and Openness in Sports Science Research.审计与反馈干预措施促进体育科学研究期刊政策变革以提高透明度和开放性的可行性
Sports Med Open. 2022 Aug 6;8(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s40798-022-00496-x.
9
Principles of open, transparent and reproducible science in author guidelines of sleep research and chronobiology journals.睡眠研究与生物钟学期刊作者指南中的开放、透明和可重复科学原则。
Wellcome Open Res. 2021 Feb 26;5:172. doi: 10.12688/wellcomeopenres.16111.2. eCollection 2020.
10
Towards the enhancement of quality publication practices in clinical psychological science.朝向临床心理学科学中提升优质出版实践。
Behav Res Ther. 2020 Jan;124:103499. doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2019.103499. Epub 2019 Oct 26.

本文引用的文献

1
A registered report survey of open research practices in psychology departments in the UK and Ireland.英国和爱尔兰心理学系开放研究实践的注册报告调查。
Br J Psychol. 2024 Aug;115(3):497-534. doi: 10.1111/bjop.12700. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
2
A community-sourced glossary of open scholarship terms.一份由社区提供的开放学术术语词汇表。
Nat Hum Behav. 2022 Mar;6(3):312-318. doi: 10.1038/s41562-021-01269-4.
3
From grassroots to global: A blueprint for building a reproducibility network.从基层到全球:构建可重复性网络的蓝图。
PLoS Biol. 2021 Nov 10;19(11):e3001461. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3001461. eCollection 2021 Nov.
4
A manifesto for reproducible science.可重复科学宣言。
Nat Hum Behav. 2017 Jan 10;1(1):0021. doi: 10.1038/s41562-016-0021.
5
Array programming with NumPy.使用 NumPy 进行数组编程。
Nature. 2020 Sep;585(7825):357-362. doi: 10.1038/s41586-020-2649-2. Epub 2020 Sep 16.
6
Research Culture and Reproducibility.研究文化与可重复性。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2020 Feb;24(2):91-93. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2019.12.002. Epub 2019 Dec 28.
7
Measuring the prevalence of questionable research practices with incentives for truth telling.用真话激励法来衡量可疑研究行为的发生率。
Psychol Sci. 2012 May 1;23(5):524-32. doi: 10.1177/0956797611430953. Epub 2012 Apr 16.
8
Avoidable waste in the production and reporting of research evidence.研究证据生产与报告中的可避免浪费。
Lancet. 2009 Jul 4;374(9683):86-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(09)60329-9. Epub 2009 Jun 12.
9
How many scientists fabricate and falsify research? A systematic review and meta-analysis of survey data.有多少科学家伪造和篡改研究数据?对调查数据的系统评价和荟萃分析。
PLoS One. 2009 May 29;4(5):e5738. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0005738.
10
Funding the way to open access.为开放获取铺平资金道路。
PLoS Biol. 2005 Mar;3(3):e97. doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.0030097.