• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

中国四川血透患者在 COVID-19 期间的灾害准备相关因素:一项横断面研究。

Factors related to the disaster preparedness of patients on haemodialysis from Sichuan, China, during COVID-19: A cross-sectional study.

机构信息

Department of Nephrology, Institute of Kidney Diseases, West China Hospital of Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

West China School of Nursing, Sichuan University, Chengdu, China.

出版信息

Nurs Open. 2024 Aug;11(8):e70005. doi: 10.1002/nop2.70005.

DOI:10.1002/nop2.70005
PMID:39180141
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11343723/
Abstract

AIM

This study aimed to investigate personal preparedness among patients on haemodialysis (HD) and to examine the relationship among sociodemographic characteristics, attitudes toward disaster preparedness and personal preparedness behaviours during natural disaster incidents.

DESIGN

A cross-sectional survey was conducted.

METHODS

A convenience sampling method was used. A total of 446 participants from six areas of Sichuan province completed the online questionnaire study from February 27 to March 13, 2022. Sociodemographic characteristics, attitudes toward disaster preparedness and personal preparedness behaviours were measured. Descriptive statistics were used to analyse sociodemographic characteristics and attitudes toward disaster preparedness. The relationship among sociodemographic characteristics, attitudes toward disaster preparedness and personal preparedness behaviours were assessed using ordinal regression. Statistical significance was defined as p < 0.05.

RESULTS

A total of 446 participants completed the survey. Of these, 42.15% (N = 188) were poorly prepared, 26.23% (N = 117) were moderately prepared and 31.61% (N = 141) were highly prepared. Ordinal regression showed that knowing about disaster preparedness (Odds Ratio (OR) = 1.691, 95% Confidence Interval (CI) = 1.081-2.644, p = 0.021), participating in disaster evacuation exercises (OR = 2.519, 95% CI = 1.595-3.977, p < 0.001) and learning about disaster preparedness (OR = 2.421, 95% CI = 1.542-3.802, p < 0.001) were associated with high preparedness. Compared to patients with a university degree or higher, patients with a junior high school education or lower (OR = 3.491, 95% CI = 1.760-6.925, p < 0.001) and senior high school degree (OR = 2.052, 95% CI = 1.038-4.057, p = 0.039) were associated with high preparedness. Patients who felt very confident and could deal with all their needs (OR = 3.878, 95% CI = 2.904-7.181, p < 0.001) or patients who felt confident and could meet some of their needs (OR = 1.949, 95% CI = 1.124-3.379, p = 0.017) had higher preparedness than those who felt less confident and were not well prepared to take care of their needs.

PATIENT OR PUBLIC CONTRIBUTION

After obtaining each participant's consent, they filled out the online questionnaire using their own or a relative's cell phone while undergoing HD.

IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE

It is essential that patients should be educated not only on medical specialty topics, but also on general disaster preparedness. Medical institutions should improve and reinforce preparation training among targeted populations. The low level of preparedness is partly due to the lack of participation of patients in disaster preparedness programs. Dialysis center managers should be urged to implement such programs at their centers.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dfc/11343723/723731635a30/NOP2-11-e70005-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dfc/11343723/723731635a30/NOP2-11-e70005-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6dfc/11343723/723731635a30/NOP2-11-e70005-g001.jpg
摘要

目的

本研究旨在调查血液透析(HD)患者的个人准备情况,并探讨社会人口特征、对灾难准备的态度与自然灾害事件中个人准备行为之间的关系。

设计

这是一项横断面调查。

方法

采用便利抽样法,于 2022 年 2 月 27 日至 3 月 13 日,对四川省 6 个地区的 446 名参与者进行了在线问卷调查。调查内容包括社会人口特征、对灾难准备的态度和个人准备行为。采用描述性统计分析社会人口特征和对灾难准备的态度。采用有序回归评估社会人口特征、对灾难准备的态度与个人准备行为之间的关系。以 p<0.05 为差异有统计学意义。

结果

共 446 名参与者完成了调查。其中,42.15%(N=188)准备较差,26.23%(N=117)准备中等,31.61%(N=141)准备较好。有序回归显示,了解灾难准备(优势比(OR)=1.691,95%置信区间(CI)=1.081-2.644,p=0.021)、参加灾难疏散演习(OR=2.519,95%CI=1.595-3.977,p<0.001)和学习灾难准备(OR=2.421,95%CI=1.542-3.802,p<0.001)与准备良好相关。与具有大学学历或以上的患者相比,具有初中或以下学历(OR=3.491,95%CI=1.760-6.925,p<0.001)和高中学历(OR=2.052,95%CI=1.038-4.057,p=0.039)的患者与准备良好相关。感觉非常有信心并能够满足所有需求的患者(OR=3.878,95%CI=2.904-7.181,p<0.001)或感觉有信心并能够满足部分需求的患者(OR=1.949,95%CI=1.124-3.379,p=0.017)比那些感觉不太自信且准备不足以满足其需求的患者准备得更好。

患者或公众的贡献

在获得每位参与者的同意后,他们在接受 HD 治疗的同时,使用自己或亲属的手机填写了在线问卷。

临床意义

不仅要教育患者医学专业知识,还要教育他们一般的灾难准备知识。医疗机构应针对目标人群改善和加强准备培训。低准备水平部分归因于患者参与灾难准备计划的不足。透析中心管理人员应被敦促在其中心实施此类计划。

相似文献

1
Factors related to the disaster preparedness of patients on haemodialysis from Sichuan, China, during COVID-19: A cross-sectional study.中国四川血透患者在 COVID-19 期间的灾害准备相关因素:一项横断面研究。
Nurs Open. 2024 Aug;11(8):e70005. doi: 10.1002/nop2.70005.
2
Personal disaster preparedness of dialysis patients in North Carolina.北卡罗来纳州透析患者的个人灾难准备情况。
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2011 Oct;6(10):2478-84. doi: 10.2215/CJN.03590411. Epub 2011 Aug 18.
3
[Disaster Literacy Status and the Influencing Factors: A National Survey of 107997 Chinese Nurses].[灾害素养现状及影响因素:对107997名中国护士的全国性调查]
Sichuan Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2023 Jul;54(4):824-830. doi: 10.12182/20230760101.
4
Level of disaster preparedness in patients visiting the emergency department: results of the civilian assessment of readiness for disaster (CARD) survey.急诊患者的灾难准备水平:平民灾难准备情况评估(CARD)调查结果。
Prehosp Disaster Med. 2013 Apr;28(2):127-31. doi: 10.1017/S1049023X12001811. Epub 2013 Jan 14.
5
Anesthesiologists and Disaster Medicine: A Needs Assessment for Education and Training and Reported Willingness to Respond.麻醉医师与灾难医学:教育与培训需求评估及报告的响应意愿
Anesth Analg. 2017 May;124(5):1662-1669. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000002002.
6
Assessment of disaster preparedness and related impact factors among emergency nurses in tertiary hospitals: descriptive cross-sectional study from Henan Province of China.三级医院急诊护士灾害准备情况及相关影响因素评估:来自中国河南省的描述性横断面研究。
Front Public Health. 2023 May 4;11:1093959. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1093959. eCollection 2023.
7
Perceived Knowledge, Skills, and Preparedness for Disaster Management Among Military Health Care Personnel.军事医护人员对灾害管理的认知知识、技能及准备情况
Mil Med. 2019 Oct 1;184(9-10):e548-e554. doi: 10.1093/milmed/usz038.
8
Indonesian nurses' perception of disaster management preparedness.印度尼西亚护士对灾害管理准备工作的认知
Chin J Traumatol. 2019 Feb;22(1):41-46. doi: 10.1016/j.cjtee.2018.09.002. Epub 2018 Dec 11.
9
[Status of household disaster preparedness and affecting factors among the general public of four counties in Shaanxi].[陕西省四县公众家庭灾害准备状况及影响因素]
Zhonghua Yu Fang Yi Xue Za Zhi. 2013 Apr;47(4):347-51.
10
Disaster Preparedness and Awareness of Patients on Hemodialysis after Hurricane Sandy.飓风桑迪过后血液透析患者的灾难准备与认知
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Aug 7;10(8):1389-96. doi: 10.2215/CJN.10181014. Epub 2015 Jul 28.

引用本文的文献

1
Scoping Review of Kidney Patients and Providers Perspectives on Disaster Management.肾脏疾病患者及医疗服务提供者对灾难管理看法的范围综述
Kidney Int Rep. 2025 Mar 3;10(5):1346-1359. doi: 10.1016/j.ekir.2025.02.030. eCollection 2025 May.

本文引用的文献

1
Prevalence of Chronic Kidney Disease in China: Results From the Sixth China Chronic Disease and Risk Factor Surveillance.中国慢性肾脏病患病率:来自第六次中国慢性病及其危险因素监测的结果。
JAMA Intern Med. 2023 Apr 1;183(4):298-310. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2022.6817.
2
Temporal trends in prevalence and mortality for chronic kidney disease in China from 1990 to 2019: an analysis of the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.1990年至2019年中国慢性肾脏病患病率和死亡率的时间趋势:全球疾病负担研究2019分析
Clin Kidney J. 2022 Oct 10;16(2):312-321. doi: 10.1093/ckj/sfac218. eCollection 2023 Feb.
3
The current status and factors related to the preparation of home first-aid kits in China.
中国家庭急救包准备现状及相关因素。
Front Public Health. 2022 Nov 28;10:1036299. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2022.1036299. eCollection 2022.
4
Factors related to preparedness for emergency hemodialysis in the event of a natural disaster.与自然灾害发生时急诊血液透析准备相关的因素。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2022 Jun 17;101(24):e29288. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000029288.
5
Evaluation of Drug-Related Problems in Chronic Kidney Disease Patients.慢性肾脏病患者药物相关问题的评估
Cureus. 2022 Apr 10;14(4):e24019. doi: 10.7759/cureus.24019. eCollection 2022 Apr.
6
Disaster Preparedness Among Populations in Shenzhen, China, With and Without Chronic Disease.中国深圳有慢性病和无慢性病人群的灾难准备情况。
Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2022 Feb 18;17:e82. doi: 10.1017/dmp.2021.354.
7
Preparation of hemodialysis centers in fighting against the novel coronavirus disease during the 2019-2020 epidemic: the experience in Sichuan province, China.在 2019-2020 年疫情期间抗击新型冠状病毒病的血液透析中心准备工作:中国四川省的经验。
Ann Palliat Med. 2021 Dec;10(12):12498-12506. doi: 10.21037/apm-21-3337.
8
Maintaining Quality of Care among Dialysis Patients in Affected Areas after Typhoon Morakot.莫拉克台风后受灾地区透析患者的护理质量保持。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Jul 11;18(14):7400. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18147400.
9
Kidney problems in disaster situations.灾难情况下的肾脏问题。
Nephrol Ther. 2021 Apr;17S:S27-S36. doi: 10.1016/j.nephro.2020.02.009.
10
[Trend in medical expenditures for patients with kidney diseases: An analysis from a tertiary hospital in Beijing].[北京市某三级医院肾脏病患者医疗费用趋势分析]
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban. 2020 Nov 4;53(1):215-219. doi: 10.19723/j.issn.1671-167X.2021.01.033.