Department of Statistics and Actuarial Science, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON, Canada.
Clin Trials. 2024 Oct;21(5):604-611. doi: 10.1177/17407745241268054. Epub 2024 Aug 24.
Clinical trials with random assignment of treatment provide evidence about causal effects of an experimental treatment compared to standard care. However, when disease processes involve multiple types of possibly semi-competing events, specification of target estimands and causal inferences can be challenging. Intercurrent events such as study withdrawal, the introduction of rescue medication, and death further complicate matters. There has been much discussion about these issues in recent years, but guidance remains ambiguous. Some recommended approaches are formulated in terms of hypothetical settings that have little bearing in the real world. We discuss issues in formulating estimands, beginning with intercurrent events in the context of a linear model and then move on to more complex disease history processes amenable to multistate modeling. We elucidate the meaning of estimands implicit in some recommended approaches for dealing with intercurrent events and highlight the disconnect between estimands formulated in terms of potential outcomes and the real world.
临床试验采用随机分组的方法比较实验性治疗与标准治疗的效果,提供因果效应的证据。然而,当疾病过程涉及多种可能的半竞争事件时,目标估计值的指定和因果推断可能具有挑战性。研究退出、救援药物的引入和死亡等并发事件进一步使问题复杂化。近年来,人们对这些问题进行了大量讨论,但指导意见仍然不够明确。一些推荐的方法是根据与现实世界几乎没有关联的假设情况制定的。我们讨论了在制定估计值时的问题,首先在线性模型的背景下讨论并发事件,然后再讨论更复杂的适用于多状态建模的疾病史过程。我们阐明了一些处理并发事件的推荐方法中隐含的估计值的含义,并强调了基于潜在结果制定的估计值与现实世界之间的脱节。