• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Compare efficacy and safety of autologous blood clot injection with C-clamp vascular closure device in treatment of iatrogenic pseudoaneurysm after femoral artery puncture.

作者信息

Mansouri Mohammad Hadi, Mansouri Pejman, Hashemi Mohammad, Hashemi Seyedeh Melika, Mirshafiee Shayan, Amirpour Afshin

机构信息

Cardiac Rehabilitation Research Center, Cardiovascular Research Institute, Isfahan University of Medical Sciences, Isfahan, Iran.

Tehran Heart Center, Tehran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

J Vasc Access. 2025 Jul;26(4):1303-1309. doi: 10.1177/11297298241273641. Epub 2024 Aug 24.

DOI:10.1177/11297298241273641
PMID:39180356
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Iatrogenic femoral artery pseudoaneurysm (FAP) is a complication following femoral artery puncture, with an incidence rate of 0.2%-5.5% post-cardiac catheterization procedures. Management typically involves observation or interventional treatments such as ultrasound-guided compression (UGC) or ultrasound-guided thrombin injections. This study compares the efficacy and safety of ultrasound-guided autologous blood clot injection (UGCI) with C-clamp vascular closure device-assisted UGC in treating FAP.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Conducted at a high-volume training and research center, this prospective study enrolled patients with iatrogenic FAP post-femoral artery puncture. Patients were randomized into two treatments: UGC with a C-clamp device or UGCI. Primary endpoints were thrombosis induction within 24 h, average procedure time, and length of hospital stay (LOS).

RESULTS

The study included 105 patients with 51 undergoing UGCI and 54 undergoing UGC. UGCI achieved a primary success rate of 96% versus 63% for UGC. The mean procedure duration for UGCI was significantly shorter (22 min) compared with UGC (49 min,  ⩽ 0.0001). LOS was also reduced in the UGCI group (1.5 days) compared to the UGC group (4.5 days). Complication rates were low for both procedures, with one deep vein thrombosis and one infection observed in the UGC group.

CONCLUSION

UGCI demonstrated to be a safe, efficient, and faster alternative for treating iatrogenic FAPs with a higher success rate, reduced LOS, and similar low complication rates compared to UGC. This study suggests that UGCI could be considered a preferred method for the management of FAP post-femoral artery catheterization.

摘要

相似文献

1
Compare efficacy and safety of autologous blood clot injection with C-clamp vascular closure device in treatment of iatrogenic pseudoaneurysm after femoral artery puncture.
J Vasc Access. 2025 Jul;26(4):1303-1309. doi: 10.1177/11297298241273641. Epub 2024 Aug 24.
2
Treatment for femoral pseudoaneurysms.股动脉假性动脉瘤的治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Nov 29;2013(11):CD004981. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004981.pub4.
3
Treatment for femoral pseudoaneurysms.股动脉假性动脉瘤的治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2009 Apr 15(2):CD004981. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD004981.pub3.
4
Vascular closure devices for femoral arterial puncture site haemostasis.用于股动脉穿刺部位止血的血管闭合装置。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Mar 7;3(3):CD009541. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009541.pub2.
5
The Frontier V Study: Evaluating the Safety and Clinical Performance of a Large-Bore Vascular Closure Device After Femoral Arterial Access.
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Jul;106(1):521-526. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31574. Epub 2025 May 7.
6
Ultrasonography-guided endovascular management of femoral artery pseudoaneurysm after unintended dialysis catheterization with suture-mediated vascular closure devices.超声引导下应用缝合器介导的血管闭合装置治疗意外行血液透析导管置管后股动脉假性动脉瘤
J Vasc Access. 2024 Nov;25(6):2031-2035. doi: 10.1177/11297298221130895. Epub 2022 Oct 19.
7
Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials Comparing Manual Compression to Vascular Closure Devices for Diagnostic and Therapeutic Arterial Procedures.比较手动压迫与血管闭合装置用于诊断和治疗性动脉手术的随机对照试验的系统评价
Surg Technol Int. 2015 Nov;27:32-44.
8
Vascular Closure Devices For Axillary Artery Access: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.血管闭合装置在腋动脉入路中的应用:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Endovasc Ther. 2024 Oct;31(5):763-771. doi: 10.1177/15266028221147451. Epub 2023 Jan 10.
9
Safety and Efficacy of a Plug-Based Vascular Closure Device After Percutaneous Microaxial Flow Pump in the Treatment of Complex and High-Risk Indicated Patients.经皮微轴流泵治疗复杂高危适应症患者后,基于封堵器的血管闭合装置的安全性和有效性。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2025 Jul;106(1):189-195. doi: 10.1002/ccd.31528. Epub 2025 Apr 10.
10
Ultrasound-guided versus anatomic landmark-guided percutaneous femoral artery access.超声引导与解剖标志引导下经皮股动脉穿刺入路
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Mar 28;3(3):CD014594. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014594.pub2.