• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过#MeToo披露网络受害经历的成年人中社交反应在线问卷的验证

Validation of the Social Reactions-Online Questionnaire Among Adults Who Disclosed Online Victimization Via #MeToo.

作者信息

Bhuptani Prachi H, Peterson Roselyn, Orchowski Lindsay M, Ullman Sarah E

机构信息

Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, USA.

Brown University, Orlando, FL, USA.

出版信息

J Interpers Violence. 2024 Aug 24:8862605241271339. doi: 10.1177/08862605241271339.

DOI:10.1177/08862605241271339
PMID:39180359
Abstract

The #MeToo movement of 2017 ushered in a wave of online disclosure of sexual victimization. The ways in which people respond to the disclosure of sexual victimization can play an important role in a survivor's recovery process. This study conducted an exploratory structural equation model (ESEM) of a questionnaire aimed at characterizing the ways in which others respond to the disclosure of sexual victimization in online spaces. Participants ( = 767) were recruited via social media to participate in a study of disclosure of unwanted sexual experiences, with 25.4% ( = 195) endorsing disclosing an unwanted sexual experience online using the hashtag #MeToo and were included in analyses. Participants completed the Online Social Reactions Questionnaire (OSRQ). The questionnaire included all 16 original items from the Short Version of the Social Reactions Questionnaire (SRQ). An additional 8 items specific to online disclosure, not covered by the SRQ were added at the end, bringing the proposed OSRQ to a total of 24 items. The updated measure included the 16 original items of the Short Version of the SRQ as well as 8 additional items, for a total of 24 items. ESEM confirmed the OSRQ as a 23-item measure with a four-factor structure: (a) Turning Against+, (b) Unsupportive Acknowledgment, (c) Positive Support+, and (d) Online Sharing; model fit: χ(186) = 387.125,  < .001, CFI = 0.976, RMSEA = 0.074 (90% CI [0.064, 0.085]), SRMR = 0.034. The OSRQ revealed excellent Cronbach's alpha (α = .93) and McDonald's Omega (ω = .93). The OSRQ represents a new measure that can be used to characterize the way in which others respond to online disclosure of sexual victimization.

摘要

2017年的#MeToo运动引发了一波在线披露性侵害经历的浪潮。人们对性侵害披露的反应方式在幸存者的恢复过程中可能起着重要作用。本研究针对一份旨在描述他人对在线空间中性侵害披露的反应方式的问卷进行了探索性结构方程模型(ESEM)分析。通过社交媒体招募了参与者(n = 767)参与一项关于 unwanted性经历披露的研究,其中25.4%(n = 195)认可使用#MeToo标签在网上披露 unwanted性经历,并被纳入分析。参与者完成了在线社交反应问卷(OSRQ)。该问卷包括社会反应问卷简版(SRQ)的所有16个原始项目。最后添加了另外8个SRQ未涵盖的与在线披露特定相关的项目,使提议的OSRQ共有24个项目。更新后的测量方法包括SRQ简版的16个原始项目以及另外8个项目,总共24个项目。ESEM证实OSRQ是一个具有四因素结构的23个项目的测量方法:(a)转向反对+,(b)不支持的认可,(c)积极支持+,以及(d)在线分享;模型拟合度:χ(186) = 387.125,p <.001,CFI = 0.976,RMSEA = 0.074(90%置信区间[0.064, 0.085]),SRMR = 0.034。OSRQ显示出出色的克朗巴哈系数(α =.93)和麦克唐纳欧米伽系数(ω =.93)。OSRQ代表了一种新的测量方法,可用于描述他人对性侵害在线披露的反应方式。

相似文献

1
Validation of the Social Reactions-Online Questionnaire Among Adults Who Disclosed Online Victimization Via #MeToo.通过#MeToo披露网络受害经历的成年人中社交反应在线问卷的验证
J Interpers Violence. 2024 Aug 24:8862605241271339. doi: 10.1177/08862605241271339.
2
Online Social Reactions to Disclosure of Sexual Victimization via #MeToo and Symptoms of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder.#MeToo 运动下性受害披露的网络社会反应与创伤后应激障碍症状
J Interpers Violence. 2023 Oct;38(19-20):10900-10919. doi: 10.1177/08862605231176792. Epub 2023 Jun 4.
3
Disclosing Sexual Victimization Online and In-Person: An Examination of Bisexual+ and Heterosexual Survivors.在线和当面披露性受害经历:双性恋和异性恋幸存者的研究
J Interpers Violence. 2024 May;39(9-10):1976-1998. doi: 10.1177/08862605231213399. Epub 2023 Dec 4.
4
Associations Among Online Social Reactions to Disclosure of Sexual Victimization, Coping and Social Isolation.性受害披露后网络社交反应、应对方式与社交孤立的关系。
J Child Sex Abus. 2024 Feb;33(2):146-168. doi: 10.1080/10538712.2024.2314287. Epub 2024 Feb 10.
5
Cross-sectional examination of correlates of sexual victimization disclosure via #MeToo.通过#MeToo 对性受害披露的相关性进行横断面检查。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2024;15(1):2291932. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2023.2291932. Epub 2024 Jan 3.
6
#MeToo: Disclosure and Response to Sexual Victimization on Twitter.#MeToo:推特上性侵犯的披露与回应。
J Interpers Violence. 2021 Sep;36(17-18):8257-8288. doi: 10.1177/0886260519851211. Epub 2019 May 22.
7
Sexual Victimization Among Men: A Qualitative Analysis of the Twitter Hashtag #UsToo.男性中的性侵害:对推特话题标签#MeToo的定性分析
J Interpers Violence. 2022 May;37(9-10):NP7825-NP7849. doi: 10.1177/0886260520967167. Epub 2020 Nov 4.
8
Reactions to and Impact of Survivor Online Disclosures: A Qualitative Analysis.幸存者在线披露的反应与影响:一项定性分析
J Child Sex Abus. 2024 Nov;33(8):951-969. doi: 10.1080/10538712.2024.2428287. Epub 2024 Nov 12.
9
It's Just a Distance Thing: Affordances and Decisions in Online Disclosure of Sexual Violence Victimization.仅是距离问题:性暴力受害在线披露中的可供使用性和决策。
J Interpers Violence. 2024 Dec;39(23-24):4976-5006. doi: 10.1177/08862605241246800. Epub 2024 Apr 16.
10
"I never told anyone until the #metoo movement": What can we learn from sexual abuse and sexual assault disclosures made through social media?“直到 #metoo 运动我才告诉任何人”:我们能从社交媒体上披露的性虐待和性侵犯中吸取什么教训?
Child Abuse Negl. 2020 May;103:104312. doi: 10.1016/j.chiabu.2019.104312. Epub 2020 Mar 19.