Brown University Center for Alcohol and Addiction Studies, Providence, RI, USA.
Rhode Island Hospital, Providence, RI, USA.
J Interpers Violence. 2024 May;39(9-10):1976-1998. doi: 10.1177/08862605231213399. Epub 2023 Dec 4.
Bisexual+ (bisexual, pansexual, queer, attraction to more than one gender) people are at elevated risk for sexual victimization relative to their heterosexual counterparts. Disclosure of sexual victimization and social reactions received upon disclosure can play a major role in recovery following an assault. Using an online survey, the current study examined whether bisexual+ and heterosexual survivors of sexual victimization ( = 657) varied in disclosure of victimization, the type of disclosure (in-person vs. online via #MeToo), and receipt of various social reactions to disclosure in person and online. A chi-square test examined differences in disclosure and differences in types of disclosure (in-person only vs. MeToo across sexual identity). MANOVAS were used to examine whether in-person and online reactions varied across sexual identity. Bisexual+ survivors were more likely to disclose sexual victimization relative to heterosexual survivors. Among those who disclosed, bisexual+ survivors were more likely to disclose whereas heterosexual survivors were more likely to disclose Whereas we did not find any significant differences for in-person reactions, we did find significant differences for online social reactions using #MeToo. Heterosexual survivors received higher turning against reactions (e.g., avoided talking to you or spending time with you) and more unsupportive acknowledgment relative to bisexual+ participants. Whereas bisexual+ participants received less turning against reactions and unsupportive acknowledgment during #MeToo/online disclosure, they were also less likely to disclose using #MeToo. Findings suggest that bisexual+ and heterosexual people vary in the way they disclose sexual victimization, and in how they are responded to when disclosing in person and online.
双性恋者(包括双性恋、泛性恋、酷儿,对多种性别产生吸引力)与异性恋者相比,性受害的风险更高。性受害的披露以及披露后所得到的社会反应,在性侵犯后的康复过程中起着重要作用。本研究通过在线调查,检验了性受害的双性恋和异性恋幸存者( = 657)在受害披露、披露类型(面对面或通过#MeToo 在线)以及面对面和在线披露时收到的各种社会反应方面是否存在差异。卡方检验用于检验披露差异和披露类型差异(仅面对面或在性身份上通过#MeToo)。MANOVAs 用于检验面对面和在线反应是否因性身份而有所不同。与异性恋幸存者相比,双性恋幸存者更有可能披露性受害。在那些披露的人中,双性恋幸存者更有可能披露 ,而异性恋幸存者更有可能披露 。虽然我们没有发现面对面反应有任何显著差异,但我们确实发现了通过#MeToo 进行在线社会反应的显著差异。异性恋幸存者收到了更多的背叛反应(例如,避免与你交谈或与你共度时光)和不支持的承认,而不是双性恋者。虽然双性恋者在通过#MeToo/在线披露时收到的背叛反应和不支持的承认较少,但他们也不太可能通过#MeToo 披露。研究结果表明,双性恋者和异性恋者在披露性受害的方式以及在面对面和在线披露时的反应方式上存在差异。