Tong Michelle W, Yu Hon J, Sjaastad Andreassen Maren M, Loubrie Stephane, Rodríguez-Soto Ana E, Seibert Tyler M, Rakow-Penner Rebecca, Dale Anders M
Department of Bioengineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA; Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Department of Radiology, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.
Magn Reson Imaging. 2024 Nov;113:110222. doi: 10.1016/j.mri.2024.110222. Epub 2024 Aug 22.
MRI is commonly used to aid breast cancer diagnosis and treatment evaluation. For patients with breast cancer, neoadjuvant chemotherapy aims to reduce the tumor size and extent of surgery necessary. The current clinical standard to measure breast tumor response on MRI uses the longest tumor diameter. Radiologists also account for other tissue properties including tumor contrast or pharmacokinetics in their assessment. Accurate longitudinal image registration of breast tissue is critical to properly compare response to treatment at different timepoints.
In this study, a deformable Fast Longitudinal Image Registration (FLIRE) algorithm was optimized for breast tissue. FLIRE was then compared to the publicly available software packages with high accuracy (DRAMMS) and fast runtime (Elastix). Patients included in the study received longitudinal Tweighted MRI without fat saturation at two to six timepoints as part of asymptomatic screening (n = 27) or throughout neoadjuvant chemotherapy treatment (n = 32). Tweighted images were registered to the first timepoint with each algorithm.
Alignment and runtime performance were compared using two-way repeated measure ANOVAs (P < 0.05). Across all patients, Pearson's correlation coefficient across the entire image volume was slightly higher with statistical significance and had less variance for FLIRE (0.98 ± 0.01 stdev) compared to DRAMMS (0.97 ± 0.03 stdev) and Elastix (0.95 ± 0.03 stdev). Additionally, FLIRE runtime (10.0 mins) was 9.0 times faster than DRAMMS (89.6 mins) and 1.5 times faster than Elastix (14.5 mins) on a Linux workstation.
FLIRE demonstrates promise for time-sensitive clinical applications due to its accuracy, robustness across patients and timepoints, and speed.
磁共振成像(MRI)常用于辅助乳腺癌的诊断和治疗评估。对于乳腺癌患者,新辅助化疗旨在缩小肿瘤大小并减少所需手术范围。目前在MRI上测量乳腺肿瘤反应的临床标准是使用肿瘤最长直径。放射科医生在评估时也会考虑其他组织特性,包括肿瘤对比度或药代动力学。乳腺组织的准确纵向图像配准对于在不同时间点正确比较治疗反应至关重要。
在本研究中,针对乳腺组织优化了一种可变形快速纵向图像配准(FLIRE)算法。然后将FLIRE与具有高精度(DRAMMS)和快速运行时间(Elastix)的公开可用软件包进行比较。作为无症状筛查(n = 27)的一部分或在整个新辅助化疗治疗过程中(n = 32),纳入研究的患者在两到六个时间点接受了无脂肪饱和的纵向T加权MRI检查。使用每种算法将T加权图像配准到第一个时间点。
使用双向重复测量方差分析(P < 0.05)比较对齐和运行时间性能。在所有患者中,与DRAMMS(0.97±0.03标准差)和Elastix(0.95±0.03标准差)相比,FLIRE在整个图像体积上的Pearson相关系数略高,具有统计学意义且方差较小(0.98±0.01标准差)。此外,在Linux工作站上,FLIRE的运行时间(10.0分钟)比DRAMMS(89.6分钟)快9.0倍,比Elastix(14.5分钟)快1.5倍。
由于其准确性、在患者和时间点上的稳健性以及速度,FLIRE在对时间敏感的临床应用中显示出前景。