Department of Prosthetic Dental Sciences, College of Dentistry, Jazan University, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
General Dentists, Jazi Dental Clinics, Jazan, Saudi Arabia.
Med Sci Monit. 2024 Aug 13;30:e945243. doi: 10.12659/MSM.945243.
BACKGROUND This study investigates the effect of artificial aging of direct resin nanohybrid composites on mean bond strength values for veneer ceramic samples. MATERIAL AND METHODS Ninety direct nanohybrid composite resin (Tetric N-Ceram) cylindrical discs were divided into 5 groups (n=18 each) based on aging cycles (thermocycling), as follows: TC=no aging (control), T1=850, T3=2500, T6=5000, and T12=10000 cycles, representing 1, 3, 6, and 12 months of clinical usage, respectively. Lithium disilicate glass ceramic (IPS e.max Press) cylindrical discs were cemented to resin discs using resin cement (Variolink N) after surface treatments (ceramic etching, silaning, composite abrasion). Differences in means between subgroups were calculated using one-way ANOVA, followed by the Tukey honestly significant differences post hoc test. Differences were considered statistically significant with a P value ≤0.05. RESULTS The highest SBS between ceramic and aged composite was observed at 1 month (m=20.35) but did not differ significantly from the control group (m=20.97). For all other subgroups (3, 6, 12 months) SBS was significantly less than that of the control (P≤0.05). At 1 and 3 months, cohesive failures were more common, whereas adhesive failures were more common in 6- and 12-month-old composites. CONCLUSIONS SBS of aged composites was less than that of non-aged composites, with SBS decreasing proportionally as the resin aged. When cementing a ceramic restoration over existing composite restorations, those older than 1 month should be removed and replaced with new ones.
本研究旨在探讨人工老化对直接复合树脂纳米复合材料贴面陶瓷样本平均粘结强度值的影响。
将 90 个直接纳米复合树脂(Tetric N-Ceram)圆柱形圆盘根据老化循环(热循环)分为 5 组(每组 18 个),如下所示:TC-无老化(对照)、T1-850 次、T3-2500 次、T6-5000 次和 T12-10000 次,分别代表 1、3、6 和 12 个月的临床使用。在表面处理(陶瓷蚀刻、硅烷化、复合磨损)后,将锂硅二硅酸盐玻璃陶瓷(IPS e.max Press)圆柱形圆盘用树脂粘结剂(Variolink N)粘结到树脂圆盘上。采用单因素方差分析计算亚组间差异,然后进行 Tukey Honestly Significant Differences 事后检验。当 P 值≤0.05 时,差异被认为具有统计学意义。
陶瓷与老化复合材料之间的最高 SBS 出现在 1 个月时(m=20.35),但与对照组(m=20.97)无显著差异。对于所有其他亚组(3、6、12 个月),SBS 明显低于对照组(P≤0.05)。在 1 个月和 3 个月时,更常见的是内聚性失效,而在 6 个月和 12 个月的复合材料中更常见的是粘结性失效。
老化复合材料的 SBS 低于非老化复合材料,随着树脂老化,SBS 呈比例下降。当在现有的复合修复体上粘结陶瓷修复体时,应将超过 1 个月的修复体去除并更换为新的修复体。