Department of Plant Biology and Ecology, Faculty of Science and Technology, University of the Basque Country (UPV/EHU), Apdo. 644, E-48080, Bilbao, Spain; Plant Ecophysiology and Metabolism Group, Instituto de Tecnologia Química e Biológica António Xavier, Universidade Nova de Lisboa (ITQB NOVA), Oeiras, Portugal.
School of Biology and Environmental Sciences, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
Plant Physiol Biochem. 2024 Oct;215:109060. doi: 10.1016/j.plaphy.2024.109060. Epub 2024 Aug 20.
Climate change will bring the interaction of stresses such as increased temperature and drought under high [CO] conditions. This is likely to impact on crop growth and productivity. This study aimed to (i) determine the response of barley water relations to vegetative and anthesis drought periods under triple interaction conditions, (ii) test the possibility to prime barley plants for drought, and (iii) analyse the involvement of aquaporins in (i) and (ii). The water status of barley was not affected by drought at the vegetative stage, regardless of the environmental conditions. At the anthesis stage, when the water shortage period was more severe, barley plants growing under combined elevated CO and temperature conditions were able to maintain a better water status compared with plants grown under current conditions. Elevated CO and temperature conditions reduced the stomatal conductance and slowed down the plant water flow through a root-leaf hydraulic conductivity coordination. Leaf HvPIP2;1 and HvTIP1;1 aquaporins seemed to play a key role regulating barley's water flow, while leaf and root HvPIP2;5 provided basic level of water flow. At anthesis drought and under future combined conditions, plants showed a reduced cell dehydration and decrease in leaf relative water content compared with plants grown under current conditions. Exposure to a previous drought did not prime the water status of barley plants to a subsequent drought, but instead worsened the response under future conditions. This was due to an imbalance between the roots versus shoot development.
气候变化将带来高温和高[CO]条件下干旱等压力的相互作用。这可能会影响作物的生长和生产力。本研究旨在:(i)确定大麦在三重相互作用条件下对营养期和开花期干旱的水分关系的响应,(ii)测试大麦植物抗旱的可能性,以及(iii)分析水通道蛋白在(i)和(ii)中的参与。无论环境条件如何,干旱期对大麦的水分状况都没有影响。在开花期,当缺水期更为严重时,与在当前条件下生长的植物相比,在 CO 升高和温度升高的组合条件下生长的大麦植物能够更好地维持水分状况。CO 升高和温度条件降低了气孔导度,并通过根-叶水力传导协调减缓了植物的水流。叶片 HvPIP2;1 和 HvTIP1;1 水通道蛋白似乎在调节大麦水流方面发挥了关键作用,而叶片和根 HvPIP2;5 则提供了基本的水流。在开花期干旱和未来的组合条件下,与在当前条件下生长的植物相比,植物表现出细胞脱水减少和叶片相对含水量降低。暴露于先前的干旱并没有使大麦植物的水分状况为随后的干旱做好准备,反而使未来条件下的反应恶化。这是由于根系与地上部分发育之间的不平衡所致。