• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

线索关联驱动视觉搜索中的早期放弃。

Cue relevance drives early quitting in visual search.

机构信息

Psychology Department, Connecticut College, 270 Mohegan Avenue, New London, CT, 06320, USA.

University of Utah, Salt Lake City, USA.

出版信息

Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 Aug 26;9(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00587-1.

DOI:10.1186/s41235-024-00587-1
PMID:39183257
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11345343/
Abstract

Irrelevant salient distractors can trigger early quitting in visual search, causing observers to miss targets they might otherwise find. Here, we asked whether task-relevant salient cues can produce a similar early quitting effect on the subset of trials where those cues fail to highlight the target. We presented participants with a difficult visual search task and used two cueing conditions. In the high-predictive condition, a salient cue in the form of a red circle highlighted the target most of the time a target was present. In the low-predictive condition, the cue was far less accurate and did not reliably predict the target (i.e., the cue was often a false positive). These were contrasted against a control condition in which no cues were presented. In the high-predictive condition, we found clear evidence of early quitting on trials where the cue was a false positive, as evidenced by both increased miss errors and shorter response times on target absent trials. No such effects were observed with low-predictive cues. Together, these results suggest that salient cues which are false positives can trigger early quitting, though perhaps only when the cues have a high-predictive value. These results have implications for real-world searches, such as medical image screening, where salient cues (referred to as computer-aided detection or CAD) may be used to highlight potentially relevant areas of images but are sometimes inaccurate.

摘要

不相关的显著干扰物会触发视觉搜索中的早期放弃,导致观察者错过他们原本可能找到的目标。在这里,我们想知道在那些线索未能突出目标的部分试验中,任务相关的显著线索是否会产生类似的早期放弃效应。我们向参与者呈现了一项困难的视觉搜索任务,并使用了两种提示条件。在高预测条件下,一个以红色圆圈形式呈现的显著线索在大多数有目标出现的情况下突出显示目标。在低预测条件下,线索的准确性要低得多,并且不能可靠地预测目标(即,线索经常是假阳性)。这些与没有呈现线索的对照条件形成对比。在高预测条件下,我们发现了一个明显的证据,即在线索是假阳性的情况下,会出现早期放弃现象,表现在目标不存在的试验中,错误率增加,反应时间缩短。在低预测性线索中,没有观察到这种效应。总的来说,这些结果表明,虚假的显著线索可能会引发早期放弃,尽管可能只有在线索具有高预测价值的情况下才会如此。这些结果对现实世界的搜索有影响,例如医学图像筛查,在这种情况下,显著线索(称为计算机辅助检测或 CAD)可用于突出图像中可能相关的区域,但有时并不准确。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/376c/11345343/e373e347d792/41235_2024_587_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/376c/11345343/2d11a941cc12/41235_2024_587_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/376c/11345343/0e6e94a768c4/41235_2024_587_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/376c/11345343/e373e347d792/41235_2024_587_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/376c/11345343/2d11a941cc12/41235_2024_587_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/376c/11345343/0e6e94a768c4/41235_2024_587_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/376c/11345343/e373e347d792/41235_2024_587_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Cue relevance drives early quitting in visual search.线索关联驱动视觉搜索中的早期放弃。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2024 Aug 26;9(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s41235-024-00587-1.
2
Distracting Objects Induce Early Quitting in Visual Search.分心物诱使视觉搜索中过早放弃。
Psychol Sci. 2020 Jan;31(1):31-42. doi: 10.1177/0956797619886809. Epub 2019 Nov 20.
3
Surprising depth cue captures attention in visual search.出人意料的深度线索在视觉搜索中吸引注意力。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Aug;25(4):1358-1364. doi: 10.3758/s13423-017-1382-9.
4
The role of top-down spatial attention in contingent attentional capture.自上而下的空间注意在偶然注意捕获中的作用。
Psychophysiology. 2016 May;53(5):650-62. doi: 10.1111/psyp.12615. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
5
The footprints of visual attention during search with 100% valid and 100% invalid cues.在使用100%有效线索和100%无效线索进行搜索时视觉注意力的轨迹。
Vision Res. 2004 Jun;44(12):1193-207. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2003.10.026.
6
History Modulates Early Sensory Processing of Salient Distractors.历史调节显著干扰物的早期感觉处理。
J Neurosci. 2021 Sep 22;41(38):8007-8022. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3099-20.2021. Epub 2021 Jul 30.
7
Feature-based statistical regularities of distractors modulate attentional capture.干扰项基于特征的统计规律调节注意捕获。
J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2019 Mar;45(3):419-433. doi: 10.1037/xhp0000613.
8
Involuntary attentional capture is determined by task set: evidence from event-related brain potentials.非自愿注意捕获由任务集决定:来自事件相关脑电位的证据。
J Cogn Neurosci. 2008 Aug;20(8):1423-33. doi: 10.1162/jocn.2008.20099.
9
Attentional set modulates visual areas: an event-related potential study of attentional capture.注意定势调节视觉区域:一项关于注意捕获的事件相关电位研究。
Brain Res Cogn Brain Res. 2001 Dec;12(3):383-95. doi: 10.1016/s0926-6410(01)00066-0.
10
External cues improve visual working memory encoding in the presence of salient distractors in schizophrenia.外部线索可改善精神分裂症患者在有显著干扰物存在的情况下的视觉工作记忆编码。
Psychol Med. 2024 Jul;54(9):1965-1974. doi: 10.1017/S0033291724000059. Epub 2024 Mar 4.

本文引用的文献

1
The effect of prevalence on distractor speeded search termination.患病率对干扰项加速搜索终止的影响。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2024 Feb;31(1):303-311. doi: 10.3758/s13423-023-02337-8. Epub 2023 Aug 14.
2
Delayed onsets are not necessary for generating distractor quitting thresholds effects in visual search.在视觉搜索中,产生分心物退出阈值效应并不需要延迟发作。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2023 Aug;85(6):1811-1818. doi: 10.3758/s13414-023-02734-0. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
3
Framing the fallibility of Computer-Aided Detection aids cancer detection.
计算机辅助检测的缺陷性分析有助于癌症检测。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2023 May 24;8(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s41235-023-00485-y.
4
The presence of a distractor matching the content of working memory induces delayed quitting in visual search.当工作记忆中的分心物与搜索内容匹配时,会导致视觉搜索中延迟放弃。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Apr;84(3):760-770. doi: 10.3758/s13414-022-02477-4. Epub 2022 Mar 31.
5
The optimal use of computer aided detection to find low prevalence cancers.利用计算机辅助检测寻找低患病率癌症的最佳方法。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2022 Feb 4;7(1):13. doi: 10.1186/s41235-022-00361-1.
6
Salience matters: Distractors may, or may not, speed target-absent searches.显著性很重要:干扰项可能会加快也可能不会加快无目标搜索的速度。
Atten Percept Psychophys. 2022 Jan;84(1):89-100. doi: 10.3758/s13414-021-02406-x. Epub 2021 Dec 14.
7
From "satisfaction of search" to "subsequent search misses": a review of multiple-target search errors across radiology and cognitive science.从“搜索满足”到“后续搜索遗漏”:放射学和认知科学中多目标搜索错误的综述。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021 Aug 28;6(1):59. doi: 10.1186/s41235-021-00318-w.
8
Great expectations: minor differences in initial instructions have a major impact on visual search in the absence of feedback.期望很高:在没有反馈的情况下,初始指令中的细微差异会对视觉搜索产生重大影响。
Cogn Res Princ Implic. 2021 Mar 19;6(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s41235-021-00286-1.
9
Guided Search 6.0: An updated model of visual search.引导式搜索 6.0:一种更新的视觉搜索模型。
Psychon Bull Rev. 2021 Aug;28(4):1060-1092. doi: 10.3758/s13423-020-01859-9. Epub 2021 Feb 5.
10
Artificial Intelligence System Approaching Neuroradiologist-level Differential Diagnosis Accuracy at Brain MRI.人工智能系统在脑部 MRI 中的诊断准确率接近神经放射学家水平。
Radiology. 2020 Jun;295(3):626-637. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2020190283. Epub 2020 Apr 7.