• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

转向污染控制债券,否则碳风险将改变我们:来自美国电力公司的证据。

Switch to pollution control bonds, else carbon risk will switch us: Evidence from the U.S. electric utility firms.

作者信息

Khanchel Imen, Lassoued Naima, Khiari Cyrine

机构信息

Higher School of Business, Manouba University, Manouba, Tunisia.

LARIME LR11ES02, ESSECT, University of Tunis, Tunis, Tunisia.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 Jun 7;10(12):e32487. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32487. eCollection 2024 Jun 30.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32487
PMID:39183863
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11341333/
Abstract

This study explores the implications and effectiveness of pollution control bonds (PCBs) in reducing carbon risk, focusing on a sample of 242 U S. electric utility firms from 2012 to 2022. The research investigates the association of PCB issuances with (i) absolute (unscaled) carbon emissions levels and their three scopes; and (ii) carbon emissions intensity and its three scopes. Using quantile regressions covering the 5th, 25th, 50th, 75th, and 90th quantiles, along with the Propensity Score Matching (PSM) methodology (where the treatment group includes firms using PCBs and the control group comprises firms that do not opt for PCBs), the findings show a significant reduction in carbon emissions due to PCB issuance. Substantial differences were observed between the treatment group and the control group across various quantiles of carbon emissions, particularly for companies with medium to high carbon footprints, both in terms of overall CO2 emissions and scope 2 CO2 emissions. Moreover, disparities between the two groups were notable across all quantiles of scope 1 CO2 emissions. Additionally, among the companies using PCBs, those with lower risk profiles exhibited a smaller carbon footprint, measured by scope 3 CO2 emissions, in comparison to their counterparts. Furthermore, the study highlights a more pronounced impact of PCBs issuance during the second phase of the Kyoto Protocol and the commitment period of the Paris Agreement. The results remain robust when alternative measures of carbon risk are applied. These findings carry significant implications for municipal and financing authorities, as well as investors within the U.S. electric utility industry. This research contributes novel insights to the field of electric utility management.

摘要

本研究探讨了污染控制债券(PCBs)在降低碳风险方面的影响和有效性,重点关注2012年至2022年期间242家美国电力公司的样本。该研究调查了污染控制债券发行与(i)绝对(未缩放)碳排放水平及其三个范围;以及(ii)碳排放强度及其三个范围之间的关联。使用涵盖第5、25、50、75和90百分位数的分位数回归,以及倾向得分匹配(PSM)方法(其中处理组包括使用污染控制债券的公司,对照组包括未选择污染控制债券的公司),研究结果表明,污染控制债券的发行显著降低了碳排放。在碳排放的各个分位数上,处理组和对照组之间存在显著差异,特别是对于碳足迹从中等到高的公司,无论是在总体二氧化碳排放还是范围二二氧化碳排放方面。此外,在范围一二氧化碳排放的所有分位数上,两组之间的差异都很明显。此外,在使用污染控制债券的公司中,风险状况较低的公司与同行相比,其范围三二氧化碳排放量所衡量的碳足迹较小。此外,该研究强调了在《京都议定书》第二阶段和《巴黎协定》承诺期内污染控制债券发行的影响更为显著。当应用替代碳风险衡量指标时,结果仍然稳健。这些发现对美国电力行业的市政当局、融资机构以及投资者具有重大意义。本研究为电力行业管理领域提供了新的见解。

相似文献

1
Switch to pollution control bonds, else carbon risk will switch us: Evidence from the U.S. electric utility firms.转向污染控制债券,否则碳风险将改变我们:来自美国电力公司的证据。
Heliyon. 2024 Jun 7;10(12):e32487. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e32487. eCollection 2024 Jun 30.
2
The impact of digital industry agglomeration on firms' carbon emissions: new micro-evidence from Chinese manufacturing firms.数字产业集聚对企业碳排放的影响:来自中国制造业企业的新微观证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2024 Jul;31(35):48332-48350. doi: 10.1007/s11356-024-34361-z. Epub 2024 Jul 19.
3
The 2023 Latin America report of the Countdown on health and climate change: the imperative for health-centred climate-resilient development.《2023年健康与气候变化倒计时拉丁美洲报告:以健康为中心的气候适应型发展的必要性》
Lancet Reg Health Am. 2024 Apr 23;33:100746. doi: 10.1016/j.lana.2024.100746. eCollection 2024 May.
4
Capital Formation, Green Innovation, Renewable Energy Consumption and Environmental Quality: Do Environmental Regulations Matter?资本形成、绿色创新、可再生能源消费与环境质量:环境规制有作用吗?
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 19;19(20):13562. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192013562.
5
Disaggregated renewable energy sources in mitigating CO emissions: new evidence from the USA using quantile regressions.分拆可再生能源在减少 CO 排放方面的作用:美国使用分位数回归的新证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Nov;28(41):57582-57601. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-13829-2. Epub 2021 Jun 5.
6
Recent scenario and nexus of globalization to CO emissions: Evidence from wavelet and Quantile on Quantile Regression approach.全球化背景下 CO 排放的最新情景与关联:基于小波和分位数-分位数回归方法的证据。
Environ Res. 2022 Sep;212(Pt A):113067. doi: 10.1016/j.envres.2022.113067. Epub 2022 Mar 12.
7
Heterogeneous impacts of renewable energy and environmental patents on CO emission - Evidence from the BRIICS.可再生能源和环境专利对 CO 排放的异质影响——来自“金砖国家”的证据。
Sci Total Environ. 2019 Jun 10;668:1328-1338. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2019.02.063. Epub 2019 Feb 10.
8
The asymmetric effects of renewable energy consumption and trade openness on carbon emissions in Sweden: new evidence from quantile-on-quantile regression approach.可再生能源消费和贸易开放度对瑞典碳排放的非对称影响:分位数-分位数回归方法的新证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2022 Jan;29(2):1875-1886. doi: 10.1007/s11356-021-15706-4. Epub 2021 Aug 6.
9
Quantile causality and dependence between renewable energy consumption, WTI prices, and CO emissions: new evidence from the USA.可再生能源消费、WTI 价格和 CO2 排放之间的分位数因果关系和相关性:来自美国的新证据。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Apr;30(18):52288-52303. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-25899-5. Epub 2023 Feb 24.
10
On the nonlinear effects of energy consumption, economic growth, and tourism on carbon footprints in the USA.论美国能源消耗、经济增长和旅游业对碳足迹的非线性影响。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2021 Apr;28(16):20128-20139. doi: 10.1007/s11356-020-12242-5. Epub 2021 Jan 6.

本文引用的文献

1
What impacts do green bonds have on carbon emissions and how? A dynamic spatial perspective in China.绿色债券对碳排放有哪些影响,又是如何影响的?来自中国的动态空间视角。
Environ Sci Pollut Res Int. 2023 Nov;30(55):117981-117997. doi: 10.1007/s11356-023-30014-9. Epub 2023 Oct 24.
2
Assessing the environmental impacts of renewable energy sources: A case study on air pollution and carbon emissions in China.评估可再生能源的环境影响:以中国的空气污染和碳排放为例。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Nov 1;345:118525. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2023.118525. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
3
A novel measure of corporate carbon emission disclosure, the effect of capital expenditures and corporate governance.
一种新的企业碳排放披露衡量指标,资本支出和公司治理的影响。
J Environ Manage. 2021 Jul 15;290:112581. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.112581. Epub 2021 Apr 15.
4
Intra-Sectoral Differences in Climate Change Strategies: Evidence from the Global Automotive Industry.
Bus Strategy Environ. 2018 Mar;27(3):265-281. doi: 10.1002/bse.1968. Epub 2017 Jun 6.