Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Division of Emergency Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
CJEM. 2024 Oct;26(10):732-740. doi: 10.1007/s43678-024-00760-x. Epub 2024 Aug 26.
To examine if an ED interprofessional team ("ED1Team") could safely decrease hospital admissions among older persons.
This single-center, retrospective, propensity score matched study was performed at a single ED during a control (December 2/2018-March 31/2019) and intervention (December 2/2019-March 31/2020) period. The intervention was assessed by the ED1Team, which could include an occupational therapist, physiotherapist, and social worker. We compared admission rates between period in persons age ≥ 70 years. Next, we compared visits attended by the ED1Team to (a) control period visits, and (b) intervention period visits without ED1Team attendance.
ED length-of-stay, 7-day subsequent hospital admission and mortality in discharged patients.
There were 5496 and 4876 eligible ED visits during the control and intervention periods, respectively. In the latter group, 556 (11.4%) received ED1Team assessment. After matching, there was an absolute 2.3% (p = 0.07) reduction in the admission rate between control and intervention periods. After matching the 556 ED1Team attended visits to control period visits, and to intervention period visits without the intervention, admission rates decreased by 10.0% (p = 0.006) and 13.5% (p < 0.001), respectively. For discharged patients, median ED length-of-stay decreased by 1.0 h (p < 0.001) between control and intervention periods and increased by 2.3 h (p < 0.001) compared to intervention period without the intervention. For patients discharged by the ED1Team, subsequent readmissions after 7 days were slightly higher, but mortality was not significantly different.
ED1Team consultation was associated with a decreased hospital admission rate in older ED patients. It was associated with a slightly longer ED length-of-stay and subsequent early hospitalizations. Given that even a small increase in freed hospital beds would release some of the pressure on an overextended healthcare system, these results suggest that upscaling of the intervention might procure systems-wide benefits.
研究 ED 多学科团队(“ED1 团队”)是否可以安全降低老年人的住院率。
这项单中心、回顾性、倾向评分匹配研究在一个 ED 进行,时间为对照期(2018 年 12 月 2 日至 2019 年 3 月 31 日)和干预期(2019 年 12 月 2 日至 2020 年 3 月 31 日)。通过 ED1 团队评估干预措施,ED1 团队可以包括一名作业治疗师、物理治疗师和社会工作者。我们比较了≥70 岁患者在两个时期的入院率。其次,我们比较了 ED1 团队就诊与(a)对照期就诊和(b)无 ED1 团队就诊的干预期就诊。
ED 住院时间、7 天内出院患者的后续住院率和死亡率。
对照期和干预期分别有 5496 次和 4876 次符合条件的 ED 就诊。在后一组中,有 556 次(11.4%)接受了 ED1 团队评估。匹配后,对照组和干预组的入院率绝对下降了 2.3%(p=0.07)。将 556 次 ED1 团队就诊与对照期就诊和无干预的干预期就诊相匹配后,入院率分别降低了 10.0%(p=0.006)和 13.5%(p<0.001)。对于出院患者,与对照期相比,ED1 团队干预后 ED 住院时间中位数减少了 1.0 小时(p<0.001),而与干预期相比则增加了 2.3 小时(p<0.001)。对于由 ED1 团队出院的患者,7 天后的再次入院率略高,但死亡率无显著差异。
ED1 团队咨询与老年 ED 患者的住院率降低相关。它与 ED 住院时间延长和随后的早期住院有关。鉴于增加一个额外的床位就会给过度扩张的医疗系统释放一些压力,这些结果表明,扩大干预措施可能会带来整个系统的效益。