• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于腰椎 CT 的皮质骨螺钉置钉参数的 3D-CT 研究。

A 3D-CT Study of the Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw Placement Parameters Based on Lumbar CT.

机构信息

Department of Spinal Surgery, Zhujiang Hospital of Southern Medical University, Guangzhou, China.

Department of Orthopedic, Affiliated Hospital of Jiujiang University, Jiujiang, China.

出版信息

Orthop Surg. 2024 Nov;16(11):2771-2780. doi: 10.1111/os.14202. Epub 2024 Aug 26.

DOI:10.1111/os.14202
PMID:39187426
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11541135/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The cortical bone trajectory (CBT) technology is an effective substitute for traditional pedicle screw (PS) technology. However, there is still controversy about the CBT screw technology placement strategy. The objective of this study was to simulate cortical screw placement with the help of three-dimensional (3D) software, to discuss the differences in screws between genders and vertebral segments, and to explore a safer and more efficient strategy for cortical screw placement.

METHODS

Mimics Medical software was used to construct a 3D model of the lumbar spine, and the placement of CBT screws was simulated. The volume of each vertebral body from L1 to L5, the pedicle isthmus height (IH), the pedicle isthmus width (IW), and the sagittal vertebral distance (SAVD) were measured. The transverse distance (TD) and the longitudinal distance (LD) between the ideal starting point (SP) and the clinical SP (the intersection Q of the midline of the superior articular process and the horizontal line 1 mm below the transverse process) were measured. The cephalad angle (CA), lateral angle (LA), maximum screw diameter (MSD), maximum screw length (MSL) of each trajectory of the L1 to L5 vertebral bodies, and the percentage of the screw insertion depth (PSID) into the vertebral body were measured. Data were statistically analyzed using Student's t-test, one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA), and Tukey's test.

RESULTS

Vertebral anatomical parameters and CBT screw parameters differed between males and females. Female patients had lower IH, IW, SAVD, CA, LA, MSD, and MSL than males. IH was greatest in L1 (male, 17.81 mm; female, 16.12 mm) and the smallest in L5 (male, 14.11 mm; female, 13.05 mm). IW was smallest in L1 (male, 8.89 mm; female, 7.37 mm) and greatest in L5 (male, 16.59 mm; female, 15.43 mm). The MSD of males was smallest in L1 (6.05 mm) and greatest in L3 (7.06 mm); the MSD of females was smallest in L1 (5.13 mm) and greatest in L4 (6.64 mm). MSL was greatest at L3 (male, 33.63 mm; female, 32.28 mm) and smallest at L5 (male, 31.25 mm; female, 29.97 mm). CA was smallest in L1 (male, 22.80°; female, 21.92°) and greatest in L3 (male, 25.29°; female, 24.33°). LA was smallest in L1 (male 12.37°, female 11.27°) and greatest in L5 (male 13.56°, female 12.96°). Among the males, TD was smallest at L1 (-0.51 mm) and greatest at L5 (1.37 mm), while LD was greatest at L2 (3.46 mm) and smallest at L5 (2.40 mm). In females, TD was greatest at L1 (0.12 mm) and smallest at L3 (-0.51 mm), while LD was greatest at L1 (3.69 mm) and smallest at L5 (2.08 mm). In the overall sample, the incidence of SAVD and PSID gradually increased from L1 to L5.

CONCLUSION

The optimal screw placement strategy for CBT screws varies significantly according to sex and vertebral body segments, particularly noting the specificity of screw placement at L5. The optimal screw placement strategy should be selected based on the patient's sex and segment characteristics before surgery to maximize the safety and accuracy of CBT screw placement.

摘要

目的

皮质骨轨迹(CBT)技术是传统椎弓根螺钉(PS)技术的有效替代方法。然而,关于 CBT 螺钉技术的放置策略仍存在争议。本研究的目的是通过三维(3D)软件模拟皮质螺钉的放置,讨论男女和椎体节段之间螺钉的差异,并探讨更安全、更有效的皮质螺钉放置策略。

方法

使用 Mimics Medical 软件构建腰椎的 3D 模型,并模拟 CBT 螺钉的放置。测量每个椎体从 L1 到 L5 的体积、椎弓根峡部高度(IH)、椎弓根峡部宽度(IW)和矢状椎体距离(SAVD)。测量理想起始点(SP)和临床 SP(上关节突中点与横突下 1mm 水平线的交点 Q)之间的横向距离(TD)和纵向距离(LD)。测量每个 L1 到 L5 椎体的轨迹的头侧角(CA)、外侧角(LA)、最大螺钉直径(MSD)、最大螺钉长度(MSL)以及螺钉插入椎体的深度百分比(PSID)。使用学生 t 检验、单因素方差分析(ANOVA)和 Tukey 检验对数据进行统计分析。

结果

男女患者的椎体解剖参数和 CBT 螺钉参数存在差异。女性患者的 IH、IW、SAVD、CA、LA、MSD 和 MSL 均低于男性。IH 在 L1 最大(男性,17.81mm;女性,16.12mm),在 L5 最小(男性,14.11mm;女性,13.05mm)。IW 在 L1 最小(男性,8.89mm;女性,7.37mm),在 L5 最大(男性,16.59mm;女性,15.43mm)。男性的 MSD 在 L1 最小(6.05mm),在 L3 最大(7.06mm);女性的 MSD 在 L1 最小(5.13mm),在 L4 最大(6.64mm)。MSL 在 L3 最大(男性,33.63mm;女性,32.28mm),在 L5 最小(男性,31.25mm;女性,29.97mm)。CA 在 L1 最小(男性,22.80°;女性,21.92°),在 L3 最大(男性,25.29°;女性,24.33°)。LA 在 L1 最小(男性 12.37°,女性 11.27°),在 L5 最大(男性 13.56°,女性 12.96°)。在男性中,TD 在 L1 最小(-0.51mm),在 L5 最大(1.37mm),而 LD 在 L2 最大(3.46mm),在 L5 最小(2.40mm)。在女性中,TD 在 L1 最大(0.12mm),在 L3 最小(-0.51mm),而 LD 在 L1 最大(3.69mm),在 L5 最小(2.08mm)。在总样本中,SAVD 和 PSID 从 L1 到 L5 逐渐增加。

结论

CBT 螺钉的最佳放置策略因性别和椎体节段而异,特别是要注意 L5 处螺钉放置的特异性。在手术前应根据患者的性别和节段特征选择最佳的螺钉放置策略,以最大程度地提高 CBT 螺钉放置的安全性和准确性。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fced/11541135/798ef9a7887a/OS-16-2771-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fced/11541135/b6d66e9a49d5/OS-16-2771-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fced/11541135/f1e6500e4952/OS-16-2771-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fced/11541135/2bc860f2916b/OS-16-2771-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fced/11541135/d1d289714fb3/OS-16-2771-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fced/11541135/fb7eb818d845/OS-16-2771-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fced/11541135/326a2ffd648f/OS-16-2771-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fced/11541135/7d849a561095/OS-16-2771-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fced/11541135/ea21c0b3372c/OS-16-2771-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fced/11541135/798ef9a7887a/OS-16-2771-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fced/11541135/b6d66e9a49d5/OS-16-2771-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fced/11541135/f1e6500e4952/OS-16-2771-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fced/11541135/2bc860f2916b/OS-16-2771-g009.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fced/11541135/d1d289714fb3/OS-16-2771-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fced/11541135/fb7eb818d845/OS-16-2771-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fced/11541135/326a2ffd648f/OS-16-2771-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fced/11541135/7d849a561095/OS-16-2771-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fced/11541135/ea21c0b3372c/OS-16-2771-g010.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fced/11541135/798ef9a7887a/OS-16-2771-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
A 3D-CT Study of the Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw Placement Parameters Based on Lumbar CT.基于腰椎 CT 的皮质骨螺钉置钉参数的 3D-CT 研究。
Orthop Surg. 2024 Nov;16(11):2771-2780. doi: 10.1111/os.14202. Epub 2024 Aug 26.
2
Novel Placement of Cortical Bone Trajectory Screws in the Lumbar Spine: A Radiographic and Cadaveric Study.腰椎皮质骨轨迹螺钉的新型置入:一项影像学和尸体研究。
Clin Spine Surg. 2018 Jul;31(6):E329-E336. doi: 10.1097/BSD.0000000000000651.
3
Design and radiological confirmation of 3-column cortical bone trajectory in the lumbar spine.腰椎 3 柱皮质骨轨道的设计与放射学确认。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2024 May 24;41(2):199-208. doi: 10.3171/2024.2.SPINE231208. Print 2024 Aug 1.
4
Anatomical study of the ideal cortical bone trajectory in the lumbar spine.腰椎理想皮质骨轨道的解剖学研究。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Jan 15;100(2):e24099. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000024099.
5
[Application of three-dimensional reconstruction simulation to define the starting point of lumbar cortical bone trajectory].[应用三维重建模拟确定腰椎皮质骨轨迹的起始点]
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2020 Feb 15;34(2):162-167. doi: 10.7507/1002-1892.201908087.
6
Computer analysis of the safety of using three different pedicular screw insertion points in the lumbar spine in the Chinese population.中国人群腰椎中三种不同椎弓根螺钉置入点使用安全性的计算机分析
Eur Spine J. 2007 May;16(5):619-23. doi: 10.1007/s00586-006-0243-4. Epub 2006 Oct 13.
7
Morphometric study of the lumbar pedicle in the Indian population as related to pedicular screw fixation.印度人群中与椎弓根螺钉固定相关的腰椎椎弓根形态学研究。
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2002 Mar 1;27(5):453-9. doi: 10.1097/00007632-200203010-00004.
8
Risk of pedicle and spinous process violation during cortical bone trajectory screw placement in the lumbar spine.腰椎皮质骨轨道螺钉置入时椎弓根和棘突损伤的风险。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Aug 11;21(1):536. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03535-4.
9
Cortical Bone Trajectory Screw for Lumbar Fixation: A Quantitative Anatomic and Morphometric Evaluation.用于腰椎固定的皮质骨轨迹螺钉:定量解剖学和形态学评估
World Neurosurg. 2017 Jul;103:694-701. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.03.137. Epub 2017 May 3.
10
Feasibility of cortical bone trajectory screws for bridging fixation in revision surgery for lumbar adjacent segment degeneration.皮质骨轨迹螺钉用于腰椎相邻节段退变翻修手术桥接固定的可行性
Medicine (Baltimore). 2021 Jul 16;100(28):e26666. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000026666.

本文引用的文献

1
Robotic and navigated pedicle screws are safer and more accurate than fluoroscopic freehand screws: a systematic review and meta-analysis.机器人辅助和导航椎弓根螺钉比透视下徒手置入螺钉更安全、更精确:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
Spine J. 2023 Feb;23(2):197-208. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2022.10.006. Epub 2022 Oct 21.
2
Depth of vertebral screw insertion using a cortical bone trajectory technique in lumbar spinal fusion: radiological significance of a long cortical bone trajectory.腰椎融合术中使用皮质骨轨迹技术进行椎弓根螺钉置入的深度:长皮质骨轨迹的放射学意义
J Neurosurg Spine. 2021 Aug 13;35(5):601-606. doi: 10.3171/2021.2.SPINE202229. Print 2021 Nov 1.
3
An optimal cortical bone trajectory technique to prevent early surgical complications.
一种优化的皮质骨轨迹技术,以预防早期手术并发症。
Br J Neurosurg. 2024 Apr;38(2):208-214. doi: 10.1080/02688697.2020.1821172. Epub 2020 Sep 29.
4
Risk of pedicle and spinous process violation during cortical bone trajectory screw placement in the lumbar spine.腰椎皮质骨轨道螺钉置入时椎弓根和棘突损伤的风险。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Aug 11;21(1):536. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03535-4.
5
Cortical bone trajectory instrumentation provides favorable perioperative outcomes compared to pedicle screws for single-level lumbar spinal stenosis and degenerative spondylolisthesis.与椎弓根螺钉相比,皮质骨轨迹内固定术在单节段腰椎管狭窄症和退变性腰椎滑脱症的手术中具有更好的围手术期效果。
J Orthop. 2020 Apr 26;22:146-150. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2020.04.001. eCollection 2020 Nov-Dec.
6
Cortical bone trajectory technique's outcomes and procedures for posterior lumbar fusion: A retrospective study.皮质骨轨迹技术在后路腰椎融合术中的结果和操作:一项回顾性研究。
J Clin Neurosci. 2020 Jun;76:25-30. doi: 10.1016/j.jocn.2020.04.070. Epub 2020 Apr 21.
7
The Era of Cortical Bone Trajectory Screws in Spine Surgery: A Qualitative Review with Rating of Evidence.皮质骨轨迹螺钉在脊柱手术中的时代:一项定性评价与证据分级的综述。
World Neurosurg. 2020 Feb;134:14-24. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2019.10.079. Epub 2019 Oct 19.
8
Lumbar pedicle screw fixation with cortical bone trajectory: A review from anatomical and biomechanical standpoints.基于皮质骨轨迹的腰椎椎弓根螺钉固定:解剖学和生物力学视角的综述
Spine Surg Relat Res. 2017 Nov 27;1(4):164-173. doi: 10.22603/ssrr.1.2017-0006. eCollection 2017.
9
Accuracy of cortical bone trajectory screw placement using patient-specific template guide system.使用患者特异性模板引导系统的皮质骨轨迹螺钉置钉准确性。
Neurosurg Rev. 2020 Aug;43(4):1135-1142. doi: 10.1007/s10143-019-01140-1. Epub 2019 Jul 3.
10
Cortical bone trajectory screws used to save failed traditional trajectory screws in the osteoporotic lumbar spine and vice versa: a human cadaveric biomechanical study.皮质骨轨迹螺钉用于挽救骨质疏松性腰椎中失败的传统轨迹螺钉,反之亦然:一项人体尸体生物力学研究。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2019 Mar 8;30(6):759-766. doi: 10.3171/2018.12.SPINE18970. Print 2019 Jun 1.