Centre of Molecular and Environmental Biology (CBMA) and ARNET-Aquatic Research Network Associated Laboratory, Department of Biology, University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057, Braga, Portugal.
Institute of Science and Innovation for Bio-Sustainability (IB-S), University of Minho, Campus de Gualtar, 4710-057, Braga, Portugal.
Sci Rep. 2024 Aug 26;14(1):19772. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69963-7.
Ichthyoplankton monitoring is crucial for stock assessments, offering insights into spawning grounds, stock size, seasons, recruitment, and changes in regional ichthyofauna. This study evaluates the efficiency of multi-marker DNA metabarcoding using mitochondrial cytochrome c oxidase subunit I (COI), 12S rRNA and 16S rRNA gene markers, in comparison to morphology-based methods for fish species identification in ichthyoplankton samples. Two transects with four coastal distance categories were sampled along the southern coast of Portugal, being each sample divided for molecular and morphological analyses. A total of 76 fish species were identified by both approaches, with DNA metabarcoding overperforming morphology-75 versus 11 species-level identifications. Linking species-level DNA identifications with higher taxonomic morphological identifications resolved several uncertainties associated with traditional methods. Multi-marker DNA metabarcoding improved fish species detection by 20-36% compared to using a single marker/amplicon, and identified 38 species in common, reinforcing the validity of our results. PERMANOVA analysis revealed significant differences in species communities based on the primer set employed, transect location, and distance from the coast. Our findings underscore the potential of DNA metabarcoding to assess ichthyoplankton diversity and suggest that its integration into routine surveys could enhance the accuracy and comprehensiveness of fish stock assessments.
浮游鱼类监测对于种群评估至关重要,可提供产卵场、种群规模、季节、补充量以及区域鱼类区系变化等方面的信息。本研究评估了使用线粒体细胞色素 c 氧化酶亚基 I(COI)、12S rRNA 和 16S rRNA 基因标记的多标记 DNA metabarcoding 技术与形态学方法相比,在浮游鱼类样本中进行鱼类物种鉴定的效率。在葡萄牙南部沿海沿两条断面线进行了四个沿海距离类别的采样,每个样本分为分子和形态学分析。两种方法均鉴定出 76 种鱼类,DNA metabarcoding 的表现优于形态学方法-75 种与 11 种种级鉴定。将种级 DNA 鉴定与更高分类学形态鉴定相联系,解决了传统方法的一些不确定性。与使用单一标记/扩增子相比,多标记 DNA metabarcoding 将鱼类物种检测提高了 20-36%,并鉴定出 38 种共同物种,这增强了我们结果的有效性。PERMANOVA 分析表明,基于所使用的引物集、断面位置和距海岸的距离,物种群落存在显著差异。我们的研究结果强调了 DNA metabarcoding 评估浮游鱼类多样性的潜力,并表明将其纳入常规调查可以提高鱼类种群评估的准确性和全面性。