• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

商业和雇主赞助计划的站点中立支付的影响。

Impact of Site-Neutral Payments for Commercial and Employer-Sponsored Plans.

机构信息

University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.

出版信息

Inquiry. 2024 Jan-Dec;61:469580241275758. doi: 10.1177/00469580241275758.

DOI:10.1177/00469580241275758
PMID:39188172
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11348360/
Abstract

Site-neutral payment is a policy created by federal rule making and implemented by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) that aims to reduce healthcare costs by aligning payment rates for certain services provided in multiple care settings. Site-neutral payments are intended to eliminate the incentive for providers to acquire facilities, such as physician offices or ambulatory surgical centers (ASCs), that Medicare reimburses at the lower non-facility rate and convert those settings into hospital outpatient departments (HOPDs), where Medicare reimburses at the higher facility rate. Although initiated by Congress to address payment disparities in Medicare, similar payment discrepancies can be seen in the commercial market where individual and employer-sponsored health plans often pay more for certain outpatient services depending on their location. This analysis presents a simulation of the impact of applying site-neutral payments to the commercial market with respect to overall potential savings for consumers, health plans and the federal government. To conduct the analysis, we use an all-payer claims data base generalizable to the United States. The analysis focused on a select group of outpatient services identified by the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MedPAC). We mapped the MedPAC identified 68 Ambulatory Payment Classifications (APCs), the codes Medicare uses to reimburse facilities for outpatient services, to the relevant CPT4/HCPCS codes, which the commercial market uses for billing. The potential cost savings of applying the site-neutral payment policy to the commercial insurance market to be $58 billion for year 2022. We estimate the 10-year total (2024-2033) employer market premium reduction ranges from 5.35% to 5.0% and found that those premium reductions would result in employer-sponsored insurance (ESI) tax subsidy savings of $140 billion to the federal government over a 10-year period (2024-2033).

摘要

按项目付费是联邦规则制定的一项政策,并由医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)实施,旨在通过调整在多种护理环境中提供的某些服务的支付率来降低医疗成本。按项目付费旨在消除提供者收购设施(例如,医疗保险按较低的非设施费率报销的医生办公室或门诊手术中心(ASC))并将这些设施转换为医疗保险按较高的设施费率报销的医院门诊部门(HOPD)的激励。尽管这一政策是由国会发起的,旨在解决医疗保险中的支付差异,但在商业市场中也可以看到类似的支付差异,在商业市场中,个人和雇主赞助的健康计划通常根据服务地点支付更高的某些门诊服务费用。本分析针对将按项目付费应用于商业市场对消费者、健康计划和联邦政府的总体潜在节省进行了模拟。为了进行分析,我们使用了一个可推广到美国的所有付款人索赔数据库。该分析侧重于医疗保险支付咨询委员会(MedPAC)确定的一组选定的门诊服务。我们将 MedPAC 确定的 68 个门诊支付分类(APC),即医疗保险用于为门诊服务报销设施的代码,映射到商业市场用于计费的相关 CPT4/HCPCS 代码。在 2022 年,将按项目付费政策应用于商业保险市场的潜在成本节约预计为 580 亿美元。我们估计,在未来十年(2024-2033 年),雇主市场保费降低幅度在 5.35%至 5.0%之间,发现这些保费降低将使联邦政府在未来十年(2024-2033 年)的雇主赞助保险(ESI)税收补贴节省 1400 亿美元。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/063f/11348360/2fefd59d5b98/10.1177_00469580241275758-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/063f/11348360/b9a68a649c5b/10.1177_00469580241275758-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/063f/11348360/a1bd3d297faf/10.1177_00469580241275758-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/063f/11348360/2fefd59d5b98/10.1177_00469580241275758-fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/063f/11348360/b9a68a649c5b/10.1177_00469580241275758-fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/063f/11348360/a1bd3d297faf/10.1177_00469580241275758-fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/063f/11348360/2fefd59d5b98/10.1177_00469580241275758-fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of Site-Neutral Payments for Commercial and Employer-Sponsored Plans.商业和雇主赞助计划的站点中立支付的影响。
Inquiry. 2024 Jan-Dec;61:469580241275758. doi: 10.1177/00469580241275758.
2
Recommendations of the Medicare Payment Advisory Commission (MEDPAC) on the Health Care Delivery System: the impact on interventional pain management in 2014 and beyond.医疗保险咨询委员会(MEDPAC)对医疗服务提供系统的建议:2014 年及以后对介入性疼痛管理的影响。
Pain Physician. 2013 Sep-Oct;16(5):419-40.
3
Proposed Medicare Physician Payment Schedule for 2017: Impact on Interventional Pain Management Practices.2017年拟议的医疗保险医师支付计划:对介入性疼痛管理实践的影响。
Pain Physician. 2016 Sep-Oct;19(7):E935-55.
4
Reframing Medicare Physician Payment Policy for 2019: A Look at Proposed Policy.重新构建 2019 年医疗保险医师支付政策:政策建议观察
Pain Physician. 2018 Sep;21(5):415-432.
5
Costs of shoulder and elbow procedures are significantly reduced in ambulatory surgery centers compared to hospital outpatient departments.在日间手术中心进行肩部和肘部手术的成本明显低于医院门诊部门。
J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2023 Oct;32(10):2123-2131. doi: 10.1016/j.jse.2023.05.039. Epub 2023 Jul 6.
6
Saga of payment systems of ambulatory surgery centers for interventional techniques: an update.门诊手术中心介入技术支付系统的传奇:最新进展。
Pain Physician. 2012 Mar-Apr;15(2):109-30.
7
Facility Payments for Interventional Pain Management Procedures: Impact of Proposed Rules.介入性疼痛管理程序的机构支付:拟议规则的影响。
Pain Physician. 2016 Sep-Oct;19(7):E957-84.
8
Physician payment 2008 for interventionalists: current state of health care policy.2008年介入治疗医生的薪酬:医疗保健政策现状
Pain Physician. 2007 Sep;10(5):607-26.
9
Trends in Medicare Payment Rates for Noninvasive Cardiac Tests and Association With Testing Location.无创心脏检查的医疗保险支付率趋势及其与检查地点的关联。
JAMA Intern Med. 2019 Dec 1;179(12):1699-1706. doi: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.4269.
10
Physician payment outlook for 2012: déjà vu.2012 年医生薪酬展望:似曾相识。
Pain Physician. 2012 Jan-Feb;15(1):E27-52.

引用本文的文献

1
Physician Practice Affiliation Drives Site of Care Cost Differentials: An Opportunity to Reduce Healthcare Expenditures.医师执业附属关系驱动医疗服务地点的成本差异:降低医疗保健支出的一个机会。
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2025 Jul 24;13(3):36. doi: 10.3390/jmahp13030036. eCollection 2025 Sep.

本文引用的文献

1
Commercial Negotiated Prices for CMS-specified Shoppable Radiology Services in U.S. Hospitals.美国医院中医疗保险和医疗补助服务中心(CMS)指定的可选购放射科服务的商业协商价格
Radiology. 2022 Mar;302(3):622-624. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2021211948. Epub 2021 Nov 30.
2
THE PRICE AIN'T RIGHT? HOSPITAL PRICES AND HEALTH SPENDING ON THE PRIVATELY INSURED.价格不合理?医院价格与私人保险人群的医疗支出
Q J Econ. 2019 Feb;134(1):51-107. doi: 10.1093/qje/qjy020. Epub 2018 Sep 4.
3
Health Care Market Concentration Trends In The United States: Evidence And Policy Responses.
美国医疗保健市场集中趋势:证据与政策应对。
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Sep 1;36(9):1530-1538. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2017.0556.