Suppr超能文献

平衡整脊疗法治疗神经根型颈椎病:一项随机对照试验。

Balance chiropractic therapy for cervical spondylotic radiculopathy: A randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Li Wenxiong, Chang Yaxin, Feng Qi, Cheng Yan, Yin Jichao, Sun Yindi, Yang Feng

机构信息

Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xi'an, 712000, China.

Affiliated Hospital of Shaanxi University of Chinese Medicine, Xi'an, 712083, China.

出版信息

Contemp Clin Trials Commun. 2024 Jul 14;41:101323. doi: 10.1016/j.conctc.2024.101323. eCollection 2024 Oct.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To assess the clinical effectiveness of the balance chiropractic therapy (BCT) compared with traction therapy (TT) for patients with cervical spondylotic radiculopathy.

METHODS

Subjects were enrolled from four hospitals. Eligible patients will be randomized to one of the two arms: the treatment group and the control group. In the treatment group, patients received the BCT for 20 days, while patients in the control group received TT. Patients visited the physician at 1- and 3-month follow-up. The primary outcome was pain severity measured with a Visual Analog Scale (VAS). Secondary outcomes included cervical curvature measured using the Borden method, a composite of functional status measured by the Neck Disability Index (NDI), patient health status (evaluated by the SF-36 health survey) and adverse events (AEs) as reported in the trial.

RESULTS

Of the 240 randomly assigned patients, 120 participants were assigned to the BCT and 120 to the TT. 231 (96.3 %) provided follow-up data at 1 and 3 months. There were no significant differences in baseline data between the two groups (P > 0.05), indicating good comparability. According to the results, after BCT and TT treatment, the pain VAS score, cervical curvature, NDI scores and SF-36 scores of two groups was significantly improved (P < 0.05). Furthermore, at 20 days of treatment and 1 and 3 months of follow-up, the participants in the BCT group showed superior treatment outcomes on both primary and secondary measures.

CONCLUSION

The BCT may be a novel strategy for the treatment of the cervical spondylotic radiculopathy.

TRIAL REGISTRATION

Clinical Trials.gov Identifier: NCT02705131. Registered on March 10, 2016, https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02705131?cond=NCT02705131&rank=1&tab=table.

摘要

目的

评估平衡整脊疗法(BCT)与牵引疗法(TT)治疗神经根型颈椎病患者的临床疗效。

方法

研究对象来自四家医院。符合条件的患者将被随机分为两组:治疗组和对照组。治疗组患者接受20天的BCT治疗,而对照组患者接受TT治疗。患者在1个月和3个月随访时就诊。主要结局指标是使用视觉模拟量表(VAS)测量的疼痛严重程度。次要结局指标包括使用Borden方法测量的颈椎曲度、由颈部功能障碍指数(NDI)测量的功能状态综合指标、患者健康状况(通过SF-36健康调查评估)以及试验中报告的不良事件(AE)。

结果

在240名随机分配的患者中,120名参与者被分配到BCT组,120名被分配到TT组。231名(96.3%)患者在1个月和3个月时提供了随访数据。两组之间的基线数据无显著差异(P>0.05),表明具有良好的可比性。根据结果,BCT和TT治疗后,两组的疼痛VAS评分、颈椎曲度、NDI评分和SF-36评分均显著改善(P<0.05)。此外,在治疗20天时以及1个月和3个月随访时,BCT组参与者在主要和次要指标上均显示出更好的治疗效果。

结论

BCT可能是治疗神经根型颈椎病的一种新策略。

试验注册

ClinicalTrials.gov标识符:NCT02705131。于2016年3月10日注册,https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT02705131?cond=NCT02705131&rank=1&tab=table。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5501/11345501/a34fb455941c/gr1.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验