• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在性别中立的献血风险评估中,接受对性史问题的询问。

Acceptability of sexual history questions in a gender-neutral risk assessment for blood donation.

机构信息

The Kirby Institute, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

School of Population Health, University of New South Wales, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.

出版信息

Transfusion. 2024 Oct;64(10):1940-1948. doi: 10.1111/trf.17993. Epub 2024 Aug 27.

DOI:10.1111/trf.17993
PMID:39189045
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Currently in Australia, men are deferred from donating blood if they have had sex with another man within the past 3  months. However, a proposed gender-neutral assessment (GNA) process will ask all donors questions about sex with new or multiple recent partners, with deferral based on responses to a question about anal sex. Understanding the acceptability of such questions among existing and potential blood donors is paramount for successful implementation of GNA.

STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS

We used data from a nationally representative survey to estimate the levels of comfort with the proposed GNA questions among the Australian population and subgroups, defined by self-reported ethnicity and religion. Respondents were aged over 18 and living in Australia. Results were weighted to represent the population.

RESULTS

Most of the 5178 respondents described themselves as comfortable with answering questions about new partners (73.1%) or anal sex (64.0%) to donate blood. However, 2.2% and 4.5% indicated that questions about new sex partners and anal sex, respectively, would stop them from donating, and 4.4% and 7.7% respectively, said they were "completely uncomfortable." By religion, the least comfortable were Muslim or Eastern Orthodox respondents, and by country of birth, the least comfortable were those born in the Middle East, followed by those born in Southern Europe and Asia.

DISCUSSION

GNA appears to be broadly acceptable in the Australian context, but our findings suggest that key GNA questions are less acceptable in some population subgroups, indicating a need for targeted campaigns that consider cultural sensitivities.

摘要

背景

目前在澳大利亚,如果男性在过去 3 个月内与另一名男性发生过性行为,他们将被推迟献血。然而,拟议的性别中立评估 (GNA) 程序将要求所有献血者询问与新伴侣或多个近期伴侣发生性行为的问题,并根据对肛交问题的回答来推迟献血。了解现有和潜在献血者对这些问题的接受程度对于成功实施 GNA 至关重要。

研究设计和方法

我们使用来自全国代表性调查的数据来估计澳大利亚人口和亚群对拟议 GNA 问题的舒适度水平,这些亚群按自我报告的种族和宗教定义。受访者年龄在 18 岁以上,居住在澳大利亚。结果经过加权以代表人口。

结果

大多数 5178 名受访者表示,他们愿意回答有关新伴侣(73.1%)或肛交(64.0%)的问题来献血。然而,2.2%和 4.5%的人分别表示,关于新性伴侣和肛交的问题会阻止他们献血,分别有 4.4%和 7.7%的人表示他们“完全不舒服”。按宗教划分,最不舒服的是穆斯林或东正教的受访者,按出生地划分,最不舒服的是出生在中东的人,其次是出生在南欧和亚洲的人。

讨论

GNA 在澳大利亚背景下似乎得到了广泛的认可,但我们的研究结果表明,一些人群亚组对关键的 GNA 问题的接受程度较低,这表明需要开展有针对性的宣传活动,考虑到文化敏感性。

相似文献

1
Acceptability of sexual history questions in a gender-neutral risk assessment for blood donation.在性别中立的献血风险评估中,接受对性史问题的询问。
Transfusion. 2024 Oct;64(10):1940-1948. doi: 10.1111/trf.17993. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
2
Donor screening question alternatives to men who have sex with men time deferral: Potential impact on donor deferral and discomfort.供者筛选问题替代方案对男男性行为者的时间延迟:对供者延迟和不适的潜在影响。
Transfusion. 2021 Jan;61(1):94-101. doi: 10.1111/trf.16165. Epub 2020 Dec 2.
3
The impact of blood donation deferral strategies on the eligibility of men who have sex with men and other sexual risk behavior in Australia.澳大利亚献血延期策略对男男性行为者及其他性风险行为者献血资格的影响。
Transfusion. 2024 Mar;64(3):493-500. doi: 10.1111/trf.17732. Epub 2024 Feb 13.
4
Attitudes and willingness to donate blood among gay and bisexual men in Australia.澳大利亚男同性恋和双性恋男性的献血态度和意愿。
Transfusion. 2020 May;60(5):965-973. doi: 10.1111/trf.15768. Epub 2020 May 2.
5
Balancing non-discriminatory donor selection and blood safety in the Netherlands: Evaluation of an individual risk assessment of sexual behavior.荷兰非歧视性献血者选择与血液安全的平衡:性行为个体风险评估的评价
Transfusion. 2022 Jun;62(6):1241-1250. doi: 10.1111/trf.16896. Epub 2022 May 2.
6
Behaviour based screening questions and potential donation loss using the "for the assessment of individualised risk" screening criteria: A Canadian perspective.基于行为的筛查问题以及使用“个性化风险评估”筛查标准导致的潜在献血损失:加拿大视角
Transfus Med. 2022 Oct;32(5):422-427. doi: 10.1111/tme.12888. Epub 2022 Jun 20.
7
HIV risk behavior profiles among men who have sex with men interested in donating blood: Findings from the Assessing Donor Variability and New Concepts in Eligibility study.男男性行为者的 HIV 风险行为特征研究:来自“评估供者多样性和资格认定新概念”研究的发现。
Transfusion. 2023 Oct;63(10):1872-1884. doi: 10.1111/trf.17515. Epub 2023 Aug 29.
8
Perceived risk of HIV transmission by blood transfusion among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men (gbMSM) in Australia.澳大利亚男同性恋、双性恋和其他男男性行为者(gbMSM)对输血传播 HIV 风险的认知。
Transfusion. 2023 Aug;63(8):1528-1537. doi: 10.1111/trf.17456. Epub 2023 Jun 10.
9
Donor understanding and attitudes about current and potential deferral criteria for high-risk sexual behavior.供者对当前和潜在的高风险性行为延迟标准的理解和态度。
Transfusion. 2011 Aug;51(8):1829-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1537-2995.2011.03078.x. Epub 2011 Mar 7.
10
A mixed methods investigation of the relationship between blood donor policy, interest in donation, and willingness to donate among gay, bisexual, and other men who have sex with men in Ontario, Canada.一项混合方法研究,旨在调查加拿大安大略省男同性恋、双性恋和其他与男性发生性关系的男性(MSM)中,献血政策、献血兴趣和献血意愿之间的关系。
BMC Public Health. 2022 Apr 28;22(1):849. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13229-2.