Lassmann Łukasz, Calamita Marcelo A, Manfredini Danielle
Independent Researcher, One & Only Institute, Gdánski, Poland.
Department of Restorative Dental Sciences, University of Florida, Gainesville, Florida, USA.
J Esthet Restor Dent. 2025 Jan;37(1):94-105. doi: 10.1111/jerd.13303. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
This scoping review aims to clarify the concept of vertical dimension of occlusion (VDO) in prosthetic dentistry, addressing prevalent myths, and controversies regarding its clinical management and impact on the stomatognathic system.
This paper critically examines common beliefs about VDO alteration and its effects on temporomandibular disorders (TMD) through an extensive literature review and an international survey. The survey included 862 general dentists and prosthodontists and explored their approaches to altering VDO and their perceptions of the clinical implications. The literature review provided a thorough analysis of existing research on VDO modification techniques, the adaptability of the stomatognathic system, and the relationship between VDO changes and TMD.
The survey revealed insights into dentists' perspectives on VDO, showing that while many practitioners test a new VDO due to concerns about patient adaptation, a significant majority observed that patients typically adjust well to a new VDO regardless of the technique used. The survey highlighted differing beliefs about the need for a gradual process and trial phase for VDO alteration, as well as the stability of modified VDO. Literature review suggests the stability and adaptability of VDO changes due to muscle adaptability and indicates no direct causal or curative link between VDO changes and TMD. Traditional methods for determining VDO in complete dentures may not be suitable for worn dentition, underscoring the need for tailored approaches.
This paper suggests that the traditional belief in the need for a prolonged trial phase for VDO alterations may be reconsidered in light of evidence supporting the adaptability of the stomatognathic system. Moreover, it emphasizes the importance of distinguishing between methods suitable for complete dentures and those for managing cases of worn dentition. The purported link between VDO alterations and TMD is also found to lack scientific evidence, highlighting the need for individualized patient care based on current evidence and clinical judgment.
本范围综述旨在阐明口腔修复学中咬合垂直距离(VDO)的概念,解决有关其临床管理以及对口颌系统影响的普遍误解和争议。
本文通过广泛的文献综述和一项国际调查,批判性地审视了关于VDO改变及其对颞下颌关节紊乱病(TMD)影响的常见观点。该调查涵盖了862名普通牙医和口腔修复医生,探讨了他们改变VDO的方法以及对临床意义的看法。文献综述对VDO修改技术、口颌系统的适应性以及VDO变化与TMD之间的关系的现有研究进行了全面分析。
调查揭示了牙医对VDO的看法,表明虽然许多从业者因担心患者适应问题而测试新的VDO,但绝大多数人观察到,无论使用何种技术,患者通常都能很好地适应新的VDO。调查突出了关于VDO改变是否需要逐步过程和试验阶段以及修改后VDO稳定性的不同观点。文献综述表明,由于肌肉适应性,VDO变化具有稳定性和适应性,并且VDO变化与TMD之间没有直接的因果或治疗联系。传统的全口义齿VDO确定方法可能不适用于磨损的牙列,这凸显了采用定制方法的必要性。
本文表明,鉴于有证据支持口颌系统的适应性,可能需要重新考虑关于VDO改变需要长时间试验阶段的传统观念。此外,它强调了区分适用于全口义齿的方法和适用于处理磨损牙列病例的方法的重要性。VDO改变与TMD之间所谓的联系也被发现缺乏科学证据,这凸显了基于当前证据和临床判断进行个性化患者护理的必要性。