Suppr超能文献

[双模式人工耳蜗使用者随时间及不同影响因素的听力学结果]

[Audiological outcome of bimodal CI users over time and depending on different influencing factors].

作者信息

Schlegel Hanna, Hartmann S, Kreikemeier S, Dalhoff E, Löwenheim H, Tropitzsch A

机构信息

Universitätsklinik für Hals‑, Nasen- und Ohrenheilkunde, Eberhard Karls Universität Tübingen, Elfriede-Aulhorn-Straße 5, 72076, Tübingen, Deutschland.

Fachbereich Akustik und Audiologie, Hochschule Aalen, Aalen, Deutschland.

出版信息

HNO. 2024 Oct;72(10):729-741. doi: 10.1007/s00106-024-01508-w. Epub 2024 Aug 27.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Hearing-impaired persons with asymmetric hearing loss and a unilateral indication for a cochlear implant (CI) generally benefit from a bimodal hearing solution. The influence of bimodal fitting on speech comprehension (SC) over time has not yet been sufficiently investigated. The present study examines the influence of bimodal fitting on SC in bimodally fitted CI users with postlingual deafness at least 36 months after implantation and analyzes possible influencing factors.

METHODS

Included in this retrospective longitudinal study were 54 bimodally fitted speech-competent CI users with at least 36 months of CI experience. Audiometric data of these CI users at predefined timepoints were compared.

RESULTS

The change in the results of the Freiburg monosyllabic test (FT) over 36 months was significant (p < 5%) for the deafness group at <10 years for both the 65 dB sound pressure level (SPL) and at 80 dB SPL and also significant for the deafness group ≥10 years for 65 dB SPL. In the Oldenburg sentence test (OlSa) there was a highly significant change (p < 0.1%) for S, SN, and SN configurations and a very significant change (p < 1%) for SN (HA: hearing aid). Age at implantation as a possible influencing factor could not be confirmed in the FT. In contrast, the duration of deafness was a negative influencing factor for SC with CI in the FT, whereas a longer duration of deafness was associated with worse results in the FT. The degree of hearing loss in the ear fitted with an HA did not influence SC. The median bimodal benefit (here: difference in SC with bimodal fitting compared to unilateral HA fitting for FT at 65 dB SPL) was 10% over the total study period. For a median of 79% of the test subjects, the bimodal benefit was found over the entire period of 36 months.

CONCLUSION

Over time, SC improves significantly with a CI for the bimodal test subjects. The investigated influencing factors (age, duration of deafness, and degree of hearing loss in the contralateral ear) support the indication for bimodal provision in accordance with the guideline in Germany for cochlear implantation-regardless of age, duration of deafness, and hearing ability of the contralateral ear.

摘要

背景

患有不对称听力损失且有单侧人工耳蜗植入(CI)指征的听力障碍者通常能从双耳混合听力解决方案中获益。双耳混合验配对言语理解(SC)随时间的影响尚未得到充分研究。本研究考察双耳混合验配对植入后至少36个月的语后聋双耳混合验配CI使用者的言语理解的影响,并分析可能的影响因素。

方法

这项回顾性纵向研究纳入了54名双耳混合验配且具备言语能力、有至少36个月CI使用经验的CI使用者。比较了这些CI使用者在预定义时间点的听力数据。

结果

对于<10岁的耳聋组,在65分贝声压级(SPL)和80分贝SPL时,弗莱堡单音节测试(FT)结果在36个月内的变化具有显著性(p<5%);对于≥10岁的耳聋组,在65分贝SPL时变化也具有显著性。在奥尔登堡句子测试(OlSa)中,对于S、SN和SN配置有高度显著性变化(p<0.1%),对于SN(HA:助听器)有非常显著性变化(p<1%)。植入时的年龄作为一个可能的影响因素在FT中未得到证实。相比之下,耳聋持续时间是FT中CI言语理解的一个负性影响因素,而耳聋持续时间越长,FT结果越差。佩戴HA耳的听力损失程度不影响言语理解。在整个研究期间,双耳混合获益中位数(此处:65分贝SPL时FT双耳混合验配与单侧HA验配相比的言语理解差异)为10%。对于中位数为79%的测试对象,在36个月的整个期间都发现了双耳混合获益。

结论

随着时间推移,双耳混合测试对象通过CI言语理解有显著改善。所研究的影响因素(年龄、耳聋持续时间和对侧耳听力损失程度)支持按照德国人工耳蜗植入指南进行双耳混合验配的指征,而不论年龄、耳聋持续时间和对侧耳听力能力如何。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/aba8/11422442/d600971813f1/106_2024_1508_Fig1_HTML.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验