Zhao Chen, Wu Wei, Zhang Haoyi, Zhang Ruiyan, Zheng Xinyue, Kong Xiangzeng
IEEE J Biomed Health Inform. 2024 Dec;28(12):7068-7077. doi: 10.1109/JBHI.2024.3432633. Epub 2024 Dec 5.
Self-supervised learning (SSL) is a challenging task in sleep stage classification (SSC) that is capable of mining valuable representations from unlabeled data. However, traditional SSL methods typically focus on single-view learning and do not fully exploit the interactions among information across multiple views. In this study, we focused on a multi-domain view of the same EEG signal and developed a self-supervised multi-view representation learning framework via time series and time-frequency contrasting (MV-TTFC). In the MV-TTFC framework, we built-in a cross-domain view contrastive learning prediction task to establish connections between the temporal view and time-frequency (TF) view, thereby enhancing the information exchange between multiple views. In addition, to improve the quality of the TF view inputs, we introduced an enhanced multisynchrosqueezing transform, which can create high energy concentration TF image views to compensate for the inaccurate representations in traditional TF processing techniques. Finally, integrating temporal, TF, and fusion space contrastive learning effectively captured the latent features in EEG signals. We evaluated MV-TTFC based on two real-world SSC datasets (SleepEDF-78 and SHHS) and compared it with baseline methods in downstream tasks. Our method exhibited state-of-the-art performance, achieving accuracies of 78.64% and 81.45% with SleepEDF-78 and SHHS, respectively, and macro F1-scores of 70.39% with SleepEDF-78 and 70.47% with SHHS.
自监督学习(SSL)在睡眠阶段分类(SSC)中是一项具有挑战性的任务,它能够从未标记数据中挖掘有价值的表示。然而,传统的SSL方法通常侧重于单视图学习,并未充分利用多视图信息之间的相互作用。在本研究中,我们聚焦于同一脑电图(EEG)信号的多域视图,并通过时间序列和时频对比(MV-TTFC)开发了一种自监督多视图表示学习框架。在MV-TTFC框架中,我们内置了一个跨域视图对比学习预测任务,以建立时间视图和时频(TF)视图之间的联系,从而增强多视图之间的信息交换。此外,为了提高TF视图输入的质量,我们引入了一种增强型多同步挤压变换,它可以创建高能量集中的TF图像视图,以弥补传统TF处理技术中不准确的表示。最后,整合时间、TF和融合空间对比学习有效地捕捉了EEG信号中的潜在特征。我们基于两个真实世界的SSC数据集(SleepEDF-78和SHHS)对MV-TTFC进行了评估,并在下游任务中将其与基线方法进行了比较。我们的方法展现出了最优性能,在SleepEDF-78和SHHS数据集上分别达到了78.64%和81.45%的准确率,以及在SleepEDF-78和SHHS数据集上分别达到了70.39%和70.47%的宏F1分数。