Breeding and Genetics, Institute for Bee Research Hohen Neuendorf, Friedrich-Engels-Str. 32, Hohen Neuendorf, 16540, Germany.
Hereditas. 2024 Aug 27;161(1):28. doi: 10.1186/s41065-024-00332-0.
Mating control is a crucial aspect of honeybee breeding. Instrumental insemination of queens gives the breeder maximum control over the genetic origin of the involved drones. However, in addition to the drones' descent, the breeder's control also extends over the number of drones to use for inseminations. Thus far, this aspect has largely been ignored in attempts to optimize honeybee breeding schemes. The literature provides some comparisons between single drone inseminations (SDI) and multi drone inseminations (MDI) but it is unclear whether the number of drones used in MDI is a relevant parameter for the optimization of honeybee breeding programs.
By computer simulations, we investigated the effect of the number of drones per inseminated queen in breeding programs that relied on best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP) breeding values. We covered a range of 1 to 50 drones per queen and observed the developments of genetic gain and inbreeding over a period of 20 years. Hereby, we focused on insemination schemes that take the drones for one queen from a single colony.
SDI strategies led to 5.46% to 14.19% higher genetic gain than MDI at the cost of 6.1% to 30.2% higher inbreeding rates. The number of drones used in MDI settings had only a negligible impact on the results. There was a slight tendency that more drones lead to lower genetic gain and lower inbreeding rates but whenever more than five drones were used for inseminations, no significant differences could be observed.
The opportunities to optimize breeding schemes via the number of drones used in inseminations are very limited. SDI can be a viable strategy in situations where breeders are interested in genetically homogeneous offspring or precise pedigree information. However, such strategies have to account for the fact that the semen from a single drone is insufficient to fill a queen's spermatheca, whence SDI queens will not build full-strength colonies. When deciding for MDI, breeders should focus on collecting enough semen for a succesful insemination, regardless of how many drones they need for this purpose.
交配控制是蜜蜂繁殖的关键方面。对蜂王进行仪器授精使饲养者能够最大程度地控制参与授精的雄蜂的遗传起源。然而,除了雄蜂的血统外,饲养者的控制还扩展到用于授精的雄蜂数量。到目前为止,在尝试优化蜜蜂繁殖方案时,这一方面在很大程度上被忽视了。文献中提供了一些关于单一雄蜂授精(SDI)和多雄蜂授精(MDI)的比较,但尚不清楚 MDI 中使用的雄蜂数量是否是优化蜜蜂繁殖计划的一个相关参数。
通过计算机模拟,我们研究了在依赖最佳线性无偏预测(BLUP)育种值的繁殖计划中,每只授精蜂王的雄蜂数量对繁殖的影响。我们涵盖了每只蜂王 1 到 50 只雄蜂的范围,并在 20 年内观察了遗传增益和近交率的发展。在此,我们专注于从单个蜂群中为一只蜂王授精的授精方案。
SDI 策略比 MDI 策略的遗传增益高 5.46%至 14.19%,而近交率高 6.1%至 30.2%。MDI 设定中使用的雄蜂数量对结果只有微不足道的影响。有一个轻微的趋势是,使用更多的雄蜂会导致遗传增益降低和近交率降低,但只要使用超过五只雄蜂进行授精,就不会观察到显著差异。
通过在授精中使用的雄蜂数量来优化繁殖方案的机会非常有限。在饲养者对遗传上同质的后代或精确的系谱信息感兴趣的情况下,SDI 可以是一种可行的策略。然而,这种策略必须考虑到这样一个事实,即单一雄蜂的精液不足以填满蜂王的受精囊,因此 SDI 蜂王不会建立全强度的蜂群。当决定进行 MDI 时,饲养者应专注于收集足够的精液以进行成功的授精,而无需考虑为此目的需要多少只雄蜂。