Maucourt Ségolène, Rousseau Andrée, Fortin Frédéric, Robert Claude, Giovenazzo Pierre
Department of Biology, Vachon Pavillon, Université Laval, Québec, QC G1V 0A6, Canada.
Centre de Sciences Animales de Deschambault, 120A Chemin du Roy, Deschambault, QC G0A 1S0, Canada.
Insects. 2023 Mar 21;14(3):301. doi: 10.3390/insects14030301.
Controlling mating in the honeybee () is part of one of the greatest challenges for the beekeeping industry's genetic selection programs due to specific characteristics of their reproduction. Several techniques for supervising honeybee mating with relative effective control have been developed over the years to allow honeybee selection. As part of this project, we compared the genetic gains for several colony performance traits, obtained using the BLUP-animal method, according to the selection pressure applied in controlled reproduction (directed fertilization versus instrumental insemination). Our results show similar genetic gains for hygienic behavior and honey production between colonies whether queens were fertilized naturally or via instrumental insemination, as well as similar or lower genetic gains for colonies with queens inseminated for spring development. In addition, we noticed greater fragility in queens following insemination. These findings show that instrumental insemination is an effective tool for reproductive control in genetic selection and for estimating breeding values more precisely. However, this technique does not result in queens of superior genetic quality for commercial purposes.
由于蜜蜂繁殖的特定特性,控制蜜蜂交配是养蜂业遗传选择计划面临的最大挑战之一。多年来,人们开发了几种相对有效控制蜜蜂交配的监督技术,以实现蜜蜂的选择。作为该项目的一部分,我们根据控制繁殖中施加的选择压力(定向受精与器械授精),比较了使用BLUP动物模型方法获得的几个蜂群性能性状的遗传进展。我们的结果表明,无论是自然受精还是通过器械授精的蜂群,其卫生行为和蜂蜜产量的遗传进展相似,对于春季发育授精的蜂群,其遗传进展相似或更低。此外,我们注意到授精后蜂王的脆弱性更大。这些发现表明,器械授精是遗传选择中生殖控制和更精确估计育种值的有效工具。然而,这项技术并不能产生具有卓越遗传品质的商业蜂王。