Scholman Merel, Marchal Marian, Demberg Vera
Department of Language Science and Technology, Saarland University, Saarbrücken, Germany.
Utrecht University, Institute for Language Sciences, Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Discourse Process. 2024 Mar 19;61(8):381-403. doi: 10.1080/0163853X.2024.2325262. eCollection 2024.
The comprehension of connectives is crucial for understanding the discourse relations that make up a text. We studied connective comprehension in English to investigate whether adult comprehenders acquire the meaning and intended use of connectives to a similar extent and how connective features and individual differences impact connective comprehension. A coherence judgment study indicated that differences in how well people comprehend connectives depend on the lexical transparency but not on the frequency of the connective. Furthermore, individual variation between participants can be explained by their vocabulary size, nonverbal IQ, and cognitive reasoning style. Print exposure was not found to be relevant. These findings provide further insight into the factors that influence discourse processing and highlight the need to consider individual differences in discourse comprehension research as well as the need to examine a wider range of connectives in empirical studies of discourse markers.
对于理解构成文本的语篇关系而言,连接词的理解至关重要。我们对英语中的连接词理解进行了研究,以调查成年理解者是否在相似程度上掌握了连接词的含义和预期用法,以及连接词特征和个体差异如何影响连接词理解。一项连贯判断研究表明,人们对连接词理解程度的差异取决于词汇透明度,而非连接词的频率。此外,参与者之间的个体差异可以通过他们的词汇量、非言语智商和认知推理风格来解释。未发现印刷品接触与之相关。这些发现为影响语篇处理的因素提供了进一步的见解,并强调在语篇理解研究中需要考虑个体差异,以及在话语标记的实证研究中需要考察更广泛的连接词。