Tran An H, Tremblay Kathryn A, Binder Katherine S
Department of Psychology and Education, Mount Holyoke College, 50 College St, South Hadley, MA, 01075, USA.
J Psycholinguist Res. 2020 Apr;49(2):335-350. doi: 10.1007/s10936-020-09694-8.
The purpose of this study was to examine the factor structure of vocabulary. We believe that not only is vocabulary multidimensional, but depth of vocabulary knowledge should also be assessed with multiple measures since it too, is composed of multiple aspects. Furthermore, to explore the predictive validity of the different aspects of vocabulary knowledge, we assessed the relationship between vocabulary breadth, vocabulary depth, and reading comprehension in adults with low literacy skills. The participants were 103 adults. They completed 12 tasks that have been used in past studies to measure vocabulary breadth, depth, and reading comprehension. We had several important findings. First, we confirmed that all of the assessments were highly reliable for adults with low literacy skills. Second, the results of the factor analysis indicated two distinct vocabulary factors. Finally, both breadth and depth contribute independently to explaining variance in reading comprehension. Implications for vocabulary measurement are suggested.
本研究的目的是检验词汇的因素结构。我们认为,词汇不仅是多维度的,而且词汇知识的深度也应该通过多种测量方法来评估,因为它同样由多个方面组成。此外,为了探究词汇知识不同方面的预测效度,我们评估了低读写能力成年人的词汇广度、词汇深度和阅读理解之间的关系。参与者为103名成年人。他们完成了过去研究中用于测量词汇广度、深度和阅读理解的12项任务。我们有几个重要发现。首先,我们证实所有评估对低读写能力的成年人来说都是高度可靠的。其次,因素分析结果表明存在两个不同的词汇因素。最后,广度和深度都独立地有助于解释阅读理解中的方差。文中还提出了对词汇测量的启示。