Oganov Anthony C, Chou Timothy Y, Hanson Paris M, Abazari Azin, Kung Preston, Weissbart Sarah B, Lenoci Jacqueline N, Honkanen Robert A
Department of Ophthalmology, Renaissance School of Medicine, Stony Brook University, Stony Brook, NY, 11974, USA.
Clin Ophthalmol. 2024 Aug 23;18:2369-2380. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S460454. eCollection 2024.
The aim of the research was to evaluate the use of teleophthalmology at a university practice during the COVID-19 pandemic, specifically examining precision, effectiveness, and patient satisfaction.
Telemedicine visits were offered to new and established patients requesting appointments with the Stony Brook University Department of Ophthalmology between March 30 and June 2, 2020. Records from these visits were reviewed for chief complaint, past medical and ocular history, diagnoses, treatment/management, and providers' sub-specialty. Precision was determined by comparing agreement between diagnoses of the telemedicine visit with those of the subsequent in-person visit. The decision to follow up in person was made by the physician and patient. Diagnostic precision as well as progression, improvement, or stability of patients' symptoms were determined by the physician's assessment at follow-up visits. Post-telemedicine visit satisfaction surveys were sent to all patients.
Telemedicine visits were offered to 783 patients, 520 (66.4%) of whom accepted. Of these 520 patients, 409 (78.7%) were established and 105 (20.2%) had in-person, follow-up visits. Overall, the diagnostic precision of the follow-up visits was 89.5%. Precision differed significantly across ophthalmologic subspecialties. Of the patients who had in-person follow-up visits, 56.8% remained stable, 32.4% improved, and 10.8% worsened. Established patients presented with more extensive ocular histories/procedures and experienced a higher percentage of worsening symptoms/disease stage compared to new patients. Oculoplastics/orbit was the most prevalent diagnostic subspecialty that worsened. Surveys were sent to all patients completing telemedicine visits, 15.0% of whom responded. Overall satisfaction was 91.9%, although only 23.0% of respondents preferred telemedicine to an in-office visit.
Telehealth provides high levels of precision and patient satisfaction for a wide range of ophthalmologic visits, although most patients still prefer in-office examinations. Employing teleophthalmology for follow-up and emergency care may provide patients with an effective alternative during pandemic situations and beyond.
本研究旨在评估在2019冠状病毒病大流行期间一所大学医疗机构中远程眼科的应用情况,具体考察其准确性、有效性和患者满意度。
在2020年3月30日至6月2日期间,为新患者和复诊患者提供了与石溪大学眼科系预约的远程医疗服务。对这些就诊记录进行回顾,内容包括主诉、既往病史和眼部病史、诊断、治疗/管理以及医生的亚专业。通过比较远程医疗就诊诊断与随后面对面就诊诊断之间的一致性来确定准确性。是否进行面对面随访由医生和患者共同决定。在随访就诊时,由医生评估诊断准确性以及患者症状的进展、改善或稳定情况。在远程医疗就诊后,向所有患者发送满意度调查问卷。
共向783名患者提供了远程医疗服务,其中520名(66.4%)接受了服务。在这520名患者中,409名(78.7%)为复诊患者,105名(20.2%)进行了面对面的随访就诊。总体而言,随访就诊的诊断准确性为89.5%。不同眼科亚专业的准确性差异显著。在进行面对面随访的患者中,56.8%病情稳定,32.4%病情改善,10.8%病情恶化。与新患者相比,复诊患者有更广泛的眼部病史/诊疗过程,且症状/疾病阶段恶化的比例更高。眼整形/眼眶科是病情恶化最常见的诊断亚专业。调查问卷发送给了所有完成远程医疗就诊的患者,其中15.0%进行了回复。总体满意度为91.9%,不过只有23.0%的受访者更喜欢远程医疗而非门诊就诊。
远程医疗在广泛的眼科就诊中提供了较高的准确性和患者满意度,尽管大多数患者仍然更喜欢门诊检查。在大流行期间及之后,采用远程眼科进行随访和急诊护理可能为患者提供一种有效的替代方案。