The Prevalence of Blepharitis in US Eye Care Clinic Patients as Determined by Collarettes: A Pathognomonic Sign.

PURPOSE

To evaluate the prevalence of blepharitis by its pathognomonic sign, collarettes, in patients presenting for any reason to eye care clinics in the United States.

PATIENTS AND METHODS

In this retrospective study by 7 investigators at 6 eye care clinics, case records of consecutive patients who underwent a slit-lamp examination, regardless of chief complaint, were reviewed for blepharitis, as identified by the presence of collarettes. Patient characteristics, including age, gender, race, relevant ocular and systemic diagnoses, ocular medications, lid hygiene practices and contact lens wear, were also recorded.

RESULTS

Of 1032 patients (mean age: 60.2 ± 17.8 years), 57.7% had blepharitis. While the prevalence of blepharitis in patients with dry eye disease (DED) (58.9%) and cataract (55.7%) was similar to the overall prevalence of blepharitis, it was higher in patients with blepharitis (69.1%) and glaucoma (64.8%). Among patients with collarettes, 44.0% had never been diagnosed with blepharitis. Among those on anti-inflammatory DED treatment, 60.0% had blepharitis. blepharitis prevalence was significantly higher among those using topical tea tree oil versus those who were not (74.5% versus 56.7% p = 0.014); prevalence was comparable among those using/not using lid wipes (56.9% versus 55.5%).

CONCLUSION

blepharitis, based on the pathognomonic finding of collarettes, is common and likely underdiagnosed among patients seeking eye care. These collarettes are still found in patients using over-the-counter treatments for blepharitis. The present study highlights the importance of screening patients for collarettes and blepharitis as part of every slit-lamp examination.