Malvasi Antonio, Malgieri Lorenzo E, Cicinelli Ettore, Vimercati Antonella, Achiron Reuven, Sparić Radmila, D'Amato Antonio, Baldini Giorgio Maria, Dellino Miriam, Trojano Giuseppe, Beck Renata, Difonzo Tommaso, Tinelli Andrea
Department of Interdisciplinary Medicine (DIM), Unit of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Bari "Aldo Moro", Policlinico of Bari, Piazza Giulio Cesare 11, 70124 Bari, Italy.
Chief Innovation Officer in CLE, 70126 Bari, Italy.
J Imaging. 2024 Aug 9;10(8):194. doi: 10.3390/jimaging10080194.
Asynclitism, a misalignment of the fetal head with respect to the plane of passage through the birth canal, represents a significant obstetric challenge. High degrees of asynclitism are associated with labor dystocia, difficult operative delivery, and cesarean delivery. Despite its clinical relevance, the diagnosis of asynclitism and its influence on the outcome of labor remain matters of debate. This study analyzes the role of the degree of asynclitism (AD) in assessing labor progress and predicting labor outcome, focusing on its ability to predict intrapartum cesarean delivery (ICD) versus non-cesarean delivery. The study also aims to assess the performance of the AIDA (Artificial Intelligence Dystocia Algorithm) algorithm in integrating AD with other ultrasound parameters for predicting labor outcome. This retrospective study involved 135 full-term nulliparous patients with singleton fetuses in cephalic presentation undergoing neuraxial analgesia. Data were collected at three Italian hospitals between January 2014 and December 2020. In addition to routine digital vaginal examination, all patients underwent intrapartum ultrasound (IU) during protracted second stage of labor (greater than three hours). Four geometric parameters were measured using standard 3.5 MHz transabdominal ultrasound probes: head-to-symphysis distance (HSD), degree of asynclitism (AD), angle of progression (AoP), and midline angle (MLA). The AIDA algorithm, a machine learning-based decision support system, was used to classify patients into five classes (from 0 to 4) based on the values of the four geometric parameters and to predict labor outcome (ICD or non-ICD). Six machine learning algorithms were used: MLP (multi-layer perceptron), RF (random forest), SVM (support vector machine), XGBoost, LR (logistic regression), and DT (decision tree). Pearson's correlation was used to investigate the relationship between AD and the other parameters. A degree of asynclitism greater than 70 mm was found to be significantly associated with an increased rate of cesarean deliveries. Pearson's correlation analysis showed a weak to very weak correlation between AD and AoP (PC = 0.36, < 0.001), AD and HSD (PC = 0.18, < 0.05), and AD and MLA (PC = 0.14). The AIDA algorithm demonstrated high accuracy in predicting labor outcome, particularly for AIDA classes 0 and 4, with 100% agreement with physician-practiced labor outcome in two cases (RF and SVM algorithms) and slightly lower agreement with MLP. For AIDA class 3, the RF algorithm performed best, with an accuracy of 92%. AD, in combination with HSD, MLA, and AoP, plays a significant role in predicting labor dystocia and labor outcome. The AIDA algorithm, based on these four geometric parameters, has proven to be a promising decision support tool for predicting labor outcome and may help reduce the need for unnecessary cesarean deliveries, while improving maternal-fetal outcomes. Future studies with larger cohorts are needed to further validate these findings and refine the cut-off thresholds for AD and other parameters in the AIDA algorithm.
胎头倾势不均是指胎儿头部与通过产道的平面不一致,这是一个重大的产科挑战。高度的胎头倾势不均与产程延长、难产和剖宫产有关。尽管其具有临床相关性,但胎头倾势不均的诊断及其对分娩结局的影响仍存在争议。本研究分析了胎头倾势不均程度(AD)在评估产程进展和预测分娩结局中的作用,重点关注其预测产时剖宫产(ICD)与非剖宫产的能力。该研究还旨在评估AIDA(人工智能难产算法)算法在将AD与其他超声参数整合以预测分娩结局方面的性能。这项回顾性研究纳入了135例足月单胎头先露的初产妇,她们接受了椎管内镇痛。2014年1月至2020年12月期间在三家意大利医院收集数据。除了常规的阴道指诊外,所有患者在第二产程延长(超过三小时)期间均接受了产时超声检查(IU)。使用标准的3.5MHz经腹超声探头测量四个几何参数:头-耻骨联合距离(HSD)、胎头倾势不均程度(AD)、进展角度(AoP)和中线角度(MLA)。AIDA算法是一种基于机器学习的决策支持系统,根据四个几何参数的值将患者分为五类(从0到4),并预测分娩结局(ICD或非ICD)。使用了六种机器学习算法:多层感知器(MLP)、随机森林(RF)、支持向量机(SVM)、XGBoost、逻辑回归(LR)和决策树(DT)。采用Pearson相关性分析来研究AD与其他参数之间的关系。发现胎头倾势不均程度大于70mm与剖宫产率增加显著相关。Pearson相关性分析显示AD与AoP之间的相关性较弱至极弱(PC = 0.36,<0.001),AD与HSD之间的相关性较弱(PC = 0.18,<0.05),AD与MLA之间的相关性较弱(PC = 0.14)。AIDA算法在预测分娩结局方面表现出较高的准确性,特别是对于AIDA分类0和4,在两种情况下(RF和SVM算法)与医生判断的分娩结局一致性为100%,与MLP的一致性略低。对于AIDA分类3,RF算法表现最佳,准确率为92%。AD与HSD、MLA和AoP相结合,在预测产程延长和分娩结局方面发挥着重要作用。基于这四个几何参数的AIDA算法已被证明是一种有前景的预测分娩结局的决策支持工具,可能有助于减少不必要的剖宫产需求,同时改善母婴结局。需要进行更大样本量的未来研究,以进一步验证这些发现,并完善AIDA算法中AD和其他参数的截断阈值。