Suppr超能文献

电子健康和移动健康在抗菌药物管理中的应用,以降低经验性抗菌治疗的死亡率及一项关于充分治疗的系统评价与荟萃分析

eHealth and mHealth in Antimicrobial Stewardship to Reduce Mortality in Empirical Antimicrobial Therapy and a Systematic Review with a Meta-Analysis of Adequate Therapy.

作者信息

Tuon Felipe Francisco, Zequinao Tiago, da Silva Marcelo Silva, Silva Kleber Oliveira

机构信息

Laboratory of Emerging Infectious Diseases, Pontifícia Universidade Católica do Paraná, Curitiba 80215-901, Brazil.

出版信息

Infect Dis Rep. 2024 Aug 1;16(4):707-723. doi: 10.3390/idr16040054.

Abstract

The urgent requirement for swift diagnostic methods in pathogen identification and antimicrobial susceptibility testing is emphasized by rising bacterial resistance and limited treatment options, which are particularly critical in sepsis management. The shift from traditional phenotype-based methods to rapid molecular and mass spectrometry techniques has significantly reduced result turnaround times, enhancing patient outcomes. In this systematic review with meta-analysis, the aspects of correct empirical antimicrobial therapy are evaluated to determine their impact on mortality. We performed a systematic review and meta-analysis on EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, Web of Science, and MEDLINE. Studies evaluating mortality associated with empirical adequate and inadequate therapy in different sites of infection were included. Outcomes included clinical cures in microbiologically evaluable patients. Among the sites of infection, the most studied were bloodstream infections ( = 9), followed by respiratory tract infections ( = 5), intra-abdominal infections ( = 5), and urinary tract infections (evaluated by 3 studies). Inadequate therapy was associated with an increase in mortality between 11 and 68%. Technologies to speed up pathogen identification are extremely necessary to reduce mortality.

摘要

细菌耐药性的不断上升以及治疗选择的有限,凸显了在病原体鉴定和抗菌药物敏感性测试中对快速诊断方法的迫切需求,这在脓毒症管理中尤为关键。从传统的基于表型的方法向快速分子和质谱技术的转变显著缩短了结果周转时间,改善了患者预后。在这项带有荟萃分析的系统评价中,对正确的经验性抗菌治疗的各个方面进行了评估,以确定其对死亡率的影响。我们在EMBASE、Cochrane图书馆、科学网和MEDLINE上进行了系统评价和荟萃分析。纳入了评估不同感染部位经验性充分和不充分治疗与死亡率相关的研究。结局包括微生物学可评估患者的临床治愈情况。在感染部位中,研究最多的是血流感染(n = 9),其次是呼吸道感染(n = 5)、腹腔内感染(n = 5)和尿路感染(3项研究进行了评估)。不充分治疗与死亡率增加11%至68%相关。加快病原体鉴定的技术对于降低死亡率极其必要。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2dae/11353792/a031bee8ebd6/idr-16-00054-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验