• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

移动医疗应用程序的传播策略:系统评价。

Dissemination Strategies for mHealth Apps: Systematic Review.

机构信息

Universitat Oberta de Catalunya, Barcelona, Spain.

Higher Institute for Scientific and Medical Research, Yaounde, Cameroon.

出版信息

JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Jan 5;12:e50293. doi: 10.2196/50293.

DOI:10.2196/50293
PMID:38180796
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10799285/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Among the millions of mobile apps in existence, thousands fall under the category of mobile health (mHealth). Although the utility of mHealth apps has been demonstrated for disease diagnosis, treatment data management, and health promotion strategies, to be effective they must reach and be used by their target audience. An appropriate marketing strategy can ensure that apps reach potential users and potentially convert them to actual users. Such a strategy requires definitions of target end users, communication channels, and advertising content, as well as a timeline for effectively reaching and motivating end users to adopt and maintain engagement with the mHealth app.

OBJECTIVE

The aim of this study was to identify strategies and elements that ensure that end users adopt and remain engaged with mHealth apps.

METHODS

A systematic search of the PubMed, PsycINFO, Scopus, and CINAHL databases was conducted for suitable studies published between January 1, 2018, and September 30, 2022. Two researchers independently screened studies for inclusion, extracted data, and assessed the risk of bias. The main outcome was dissemination strategies for mHealth apps.

RESULTS

Of the 648 papers retrieved from the selected databases, only 10 (1.5%) met the inclusion criteria. The marketing strategies used in these studies to inform potential users of the existence of mHealth apps and motivate download included both paid and unpaid strategies and used various channels, including social media, emails, printed posters, and face-to-face communication. Most of the studies reported a combination of marketing concepts used to advertise their mHealth apps. Advertising messages included instructions on where and how to download and install the apps. In most of the studies (6/10, 60%), instructions were oriented toward how to use the apps and maintain engagement with a health intervention. The most frequently used paid marketing platform was Facebook Ads Manager (2/10, 20%). Advertising performance was influenced by many factors, including but not limited to advertising content. In 1 (10%) of the 10 studies, animated graphics generated the greatest number of clicks compared with other image types. The metrics used to assess marketing strategy effectiveness were number of downloads; nonuse rate; dropout rate; adherence rate; duration of app use; and app usability over days, weeks, or months. Additional indicators such as cost per click, cost per install, and clickthrough rate were mainly used to assess the cost-effectiveness of paid marketing campaigns.

CONCLUSIONS

mHealth apps can be disseminated via paid and unpaid marketing strategies using various communication channels. The effects of these strategies are reflected in download numbers and user engagement with mHealth apps. Further research could provide guidance on a framework for disseminating mHealth apps and encouraging their routine use.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d54/10799285/868b46ba7e24/mhealth_v12i1e50293_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d54/10799285/868b46ba7e24/mhealth_v12i1e50293_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9d54/10799285/868b46ba7e24/mhealth_v12i1e50293_fig1.jpg
摘要

背景

在现有的数百万款移动应用中,有数千款属于移动健康 (mHealth) 应用。尽管 mHealth 应用在疾病诊断、治疗数据管理和健康促进策略方面的效用已得到证实,但为了发挥其有效性,它们必须覆盖目标受众并被目标受众使用。一个合适的营销策略可以确保应用程序能够接触到潜在用户,并有可能将他们转化为实际用户。这样的策略需要对目标最终用户、沟通渠道和广告内容进行定义,以及制定一个有效的时间表,以接触和激励最终用户采用并保持对 mHealth 应用的使用。

目的

本研究旨在确定确保最终用户采用和保持使用 mHealth 应用的策略和要素。

方法

对 PubMed、PsycINFO、Scopus 和 CINAHL 数据库进行了系统检索,以获取 2018 年 1 月 1 日至 2022 年 9 月 30 日期间发表的合适研究。两名研究人员独立筛选纳入研究,提取数据并评估偏倚风险。主要结局是 mHealth 应用的传播策略。

结果

从选定的数据库中检索到的 648 篇论文中,只有 10 篇(1.5%)符合纳入标准。这些研究中使用的营销策略用于告知潜在用户 mHealth 应用的存在并激励其下载,包括付费和免费策略,并使用了各种渠道,包括社交媒体、电子邮件、印刷海报和面对面交流。大多数研究报告了用于宣传其 mHealth 应用的营销概念的组合。广告信息包括关于在哪里以及如何下载和安装应用程序的说明。在大多数研究中(6/10,60%),说明侧重于如何使用应用程序并保持对健康干预措施的参与度。使用最广泛的付费营销平台是 Facebook Ads Manager(2/10,20%)。广告表现受到许多因素的影响,包括但不限于广告内容。在 10 项研究中的 1 项(10%)中,与其他图像类型相比,动画图形生成的点击次数最多。用于评估营销策略有效性的指标包括下载次数、未使用率、流失率、参与率、应用使用持续时间以及应用在数天、数周或数月内的可用性。点击成本、每次安装成本和点击率等额外指标主要用于评估付费营销活动的成本效益。

结论

mHealth 应用可以通过使用各种沟通渠道的付费和免费营销策略进行传播。这些策略的效果反映在应用程序的下载数量和用户对 mHealth 应用的参与度上。进一步的研究可以为传播 mHealth 应用程序和鼓励其常规使用提供指导。

相似文献

1
Dissemination Strategies for mHealth Apps: Systematic Review.移动医疗应用程序的传播策略:系统评价。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2024 Jan 5;12:e50293. doi: 10.2196/50293.
2
Use of a Paid Digital Marketing Campaign to Promote a Mobile Health App to Encourage Parent-Engaged Developmental Monitoring: Implementation Study.利用付费数字营销活动推广一款移动健康应用程序以鼓励家长参与发育监测:实施研究。
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2022 Apr 5;5(2):e34425. doi: 10.2196/34425.
3
Factors Influencing Adherence to mHealth Apps for Prevention or Management of Noncommunicable Diseases: Systematic Review.影响移动医疗应用程序用于预防或管理非传染性疾病的依从性的因素:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 May 25;24(5):e35371. doi: 10.2196/35371.
4
Smartphone Users' Persuasion Knowledge in the Context of Consumer mHealth Apps: Qualitative Study.智能手机用户在消费者移动医疗应用背景下的说服知识:定性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Apr 13;9(4):e16518. doi: 10.2196/16518.
5
Persuasive Technology in an mHealth App Designed for Pelvic Floor Muscle Training Among Women: Systematic Review.用于女性盆底肌训练的移动健康应用中的说服技术:系统评价。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Mar 22;10(3):e28751. doi: 10.2196/28751.
6
Tools for Evaluating the Content, Efficacy, and Usability of Mobile Health Apps According to the Consensus-Based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments: Systematic Review.根据基于共识的健康测量仪器选择标准评估移动健康应用程序的内容、疗效和可用性的工具:系统评价。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Dec 1;9(12):e15433. doi: 10.2196/15433.
7
Interventions Aimed at Enhancing Health Care Providers' Behavior Toward the Prescription of Mobile Health Apps: Systematic Review.旨在增强医疗保健提供者针对移动健康应用程序处方行为的干预措施:系统评价。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 Feb 27;11:e43561. doi: 10.2196/43561.
8
Popular Evidence-Based Commercial Mental Health Apps: Analysis of Engagement, Functionality, Aesthetics, and Information Quality.流行的循证商业心理健康应用程序:参与度、功能、美学和信息质量分析。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jul 14;9(7):e29689. doi: 10.2196/29689.
9
Framework for the Design Engineering and Clinical Implementation and Evaluation of mHealth Apps for Sleep Disturbance: Systematic Review.用于睡眠障碍的移动医疗应用程序的设计工程和临床实施及评估的框架:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2021 Feb 17;23(2):e24607. doi: 10.2196/24607.
10
Efficacy, Effectiveness, and Quality of Resilience-Building Mobile Health Apps for Military, Veteran, and Public Safety Personnel Populations: Scoping Literature Review and App Evaluation.提升军人、退伍军人和公共安全人员人群韧性的移动健康应用的疗效、有效性和质量:范围文献综述和应用评估。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2022 Jan 19;10(1):e26453. doi: 10.2196/26453.

引用本文的文献

1
Usability and quality evaluation of the World Health Organization SkinNTDs app among frontline health workers in Cameroon: A mixed methods study.喀麦隆一线卫生工作者对世界卫生组织皮肤性传染病应用程序的可用性和质量评估:一项混合方法研究。
PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2025 Sep 10;19(9):e0013461. doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0013461. eCollection 2025 Sep.
2
Understanding Inequalities in Mobile Health Utilization Across Phases: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.了解移动健康在各阶段使用中的不平等现象:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Med Internet Res. 2025 Aug 14;27:e71349. doi: 10.2196/71349.
3
Beyond the interface: benchmarking pediatric mobile health applications for monitoring child growth using the Mobile App Rating Scale.

本文引用的文献

1
Determination of Markers of Successful Implementation of Mental Health Apps for Young People: Systematic Review.确定年轻人心理健康应用程序成功实施的标志物:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Nov 9;24(11):e40347. doi: 10.2196/40347.
2
Mobile health app for monitoring allergic rhinitis and asthma in real life in Lithuanian MASK-air users.用于立陶宛MASK-air用户在现实生活中监测过敏性鼻炎和哮喘的移动健康应用程序。
Clin Transl Allergy. 2022 Sep;12(9):e12192. doi: 10.1002/clt2.12192.
3
Remotely Conducted App-Based Intervention for Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes Risk Awareness and Prevention: Single-Group Feasibility Trial.
超越界面:使用移动应用评分量表对监测儿童生长的儿科移动健康应用程序进行基准测试。
Front Digit Health. 2025 Jun 18;7:1621293. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2025.1621293. eCollection 2025.
4
mHealth Applications in Saudi Arabia: Current Features and Future Opportunities.沙特阿拉伯的移动健康应用:当前特点与未来机遇
Healthcare (Basel). 2025 Jun 11;13(12):1392. doi: 10.3390/healthcare13121392.
5
Enhancing Mobile App Adoption for Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Medication Adherence and Self-Management: A Grounded Theory Study.提高2型糖尿病药物依从性和自我管理的移动应用采用率:一项扎根理论研究。
J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2025 Jun 21:19322968251349851. doi: 10.1177/19322968251349851.
6
How Mental Health Nurses Perceive the Implementation of Batho Pele Principles in a Selected Mental Health Hospital in Limpopo Province, South Africa.南非林波波省一家选定的精神病医院的精神科护士如何看待《巴索·佩莱原则》的实施情况。
Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Nov 29;12(23):2402. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12232402.
7
eHealth and mHealth in Antimicrobial Stewardship Programs.抗菌药物管理计划中的电子健康与移动健康
Digit Biomark. 2024 Sep 20;8(1):194-206. doi: 10.1159/000541120. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
8
Evolutionary Trends in the Adoption, Adaptation, and Abandonment of Mobile Health Technologies: Viewpoint Based on 25 Years of Research.移动医疗技术的采用、适应和摒弃的演变趋势:基于 25 年研究的观点。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Sep 27;26:e62790. doi: 10.2196/62790.
9
eHealth and mHealth in Antimicrobial Stewardship to Reduce Mortality in Empirical Antimicrobial Therapy and a Systematic Review with a Meta-Analysis of Adequate Therapy.电子健康和移动健康在抗菌药物管理中的应用,以降低经验性抗菌治疗的死亡率及一项关于充分治疗的系统评价与荟萃分析
Infect Dis Rep. 2024 Aug 1;16(4):707-723. doi: 10.3390/idr16040054.
基于应用程序的心血管疾病和糖尿病风险认知与预防远程干预:单组可行性试验。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2022 Jul 1;9(3):e38469. doi: 10.2196/38469.
4
Digital Marketing: A Unique Multidisciplinary Approach towards the Elimination of Viral Hepatitis.数字营销:一种消除病毒性肝炎的独特多学科方法。
Pathogens. 2022 May 29;11(6):626. doi: 10.3390/pathogens11060626.
5
Factors Influencing Adherence to mHealth Apps for Prevention or Management of Noncommunicable Diseases: Systematic Review.影响移动医疗应用程序用于预防或管理非传染性疾病的依从性的因素:系统评价。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 May 25;24(5):e35371. doi: 10.2196/35371.
6
Challenges in Participant Engagement and Retention Using Mobile Health Apps: Literature Review.使用移动健康应用程序在参与者参与度和留存率方面面临的挑战:文献综述
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Apr 26;24(4):e35120. doi: 10.2196/35120.
7
Use of a Paid Digital Marketing Campaign to Promote a Mobile Health App to Encourage Parent-Engaged Developmental Monitoring: Implementation Study.利用付费数字营销活动推广一款移动健康应用程序以鼓励家长参与发育监测:实施研究。
JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2022 Apr 5;5(2):e34425. doi: 10.2196/34425.
8
Physicians' Attitudes Toward Prescribable mHealth Apps and Implications for Adoption in Germany: Mixed Methods Study.医生对可开方的移动医疗应用程序的态度及其在德国采用的影响:混合方法研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Nov 23;9(11):e33012. doi: 10.2196/33012.
9
Marketing research on Mobile apps: past, present and future.移动应用的市场调研:过去、现在与未来
J Acad Mark Sci. 2022;50(2):195-225. doi: 10.1007/s11747-021-00815-w. Epub 2021 Nov 8.
10
Promoting Collaborative Goal Setting for Cancer Prevention Among Primary Care Patients Through mHealth: Mixed Methods Evaluation of a New App.通过移动健康促进初级保健患者癌症预防的协作目标设定:一款新应用程序的混合方法评估
JMIR Form Res. 2021 Jul 14;5(7):e22510. doi: 10.2196/22510.