• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经验性抗生素治疗对急性结石性胆囊炎临床结局的影响。

Impact of empiric antibiotic therapy on the clinical outcome of acute calculous cholecystitis.

机构信息

Department of Surgery, Autonomous University of Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Department of General Surgery, Hospital del Mar, Hospital del Mar Medical Research Institute (IMIM), Barcelona, Spain.

出版信息

Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Aug 29;408(1):345. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03063-4.

DOI:10.1007/s00423-023-03063-4
PMID:37644336
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10465626/
Abstract

PURPOSE

Although mortality and morbidity of severe acute calculous cholecystitis (ACC) are still a matter of concern, the impact of inadequate empirical antibiotic therapy has been poorly studied as a risk factor. The objective was to assess the impact of the adequacy of empirical antibiotic therapy on complication and mortality rates in ACC.

METHODS

This observational retrospective cohort chart-based single-center study was conducted between 2012 and 2016. A total of 963 consecutive patients were included, and pure ACC was selected. General, clinical, postoperative, and microbiological variables were collected, and risk factors and consequences of inadequate treatment were analyzed.

RESULTS

Bile, blood, and/or exudate cultures were obtained in 76.3% of patients, more often in old, male, and severely ill patients (P < 0.001). Patients who were cultured had a higher overall rate of postoperative complications (47.4% vs. 29.7%; P < 0.001), as well as of severe complications (11.6% vs. 4.7%; P = 0.008). Patients with positive cultures had more overall complications (54.8% vs. 39.6%; P = 0.001), more severe complications (16.3% vs. 6.7%; P = 0.001), and higher mortality rates (6% vs. 1.9%; P = 0.012). Patients who received inadequate empirical antibiotic therapy had a fourfold higher mortality rate than those receiving adequate therapy (n = 283; 12.8% vs. 3.4%; P = 0.003). This association was especially marked in severe ACC TG-III patients (n = 132; 18.2 vs. 5.1%; P = 0.018) and remained a predictor of mortality in a binary logistic regression (OR 4.4; 95% CI 1.3-15.3).

CONCLUSION

Patients with positive cultures developed more complications and faced higher mortality. Adequate empirical antibiotic therapy appears to be of paramount importance in ACC, particularly in severely ill patients.

摘要

目的

尽管严重急性胆石性胆囊炎(ACC)的死亡率和发病率仍然是一个令人关注的问题,但经验性抗生素治疗不足作为一个危险因素的影响尚未得到充分研究。本研究旨在评估经验性抗生素治疗的充分性对 ACC 并发症和死亡率的影响。

方法

这是一项观察性回顾性队列图表为基础的单中心研究,于 2012 年至 2016 年进行。共纳入 963 例连续患者,选择单纯 ACC。收集一般、临床、术后和微生物学变量,并分析治疗不足的危险因素和后果。

结果

76.3%的患者获得胆汁、血液和/或渗出液培养,老年、男性和重症患者更常获得培养(P<0.001)。接受培养的患者术后总并发症发生率(47.4%比 29.7%;P<0.001)和严重并发症发生率(11.6%比 4.7%;P=0.008)更高。阳性培养患者总并发症发生率(54.8%比 39.6%;P=0.001)、严重并发症发生率(16.3%比 6.7%;P=0.001)和死亡率(6%比 1.9%;P=0.012)更高。接受经验性抗生素治疗不足的患者死亡率是接受充分治疗患者的四倍(n=283;12.8%比 3.4%;P=0.003)。这种关联在严重 ACC TG-III 患者中更为明显(n=132;18.2%比 5.1%;P=0.018),并且在二元逻辑回归中仍然是死亡率的预测因素(OR 4.4;95%CI 1.3-15.3)。

结论

阳性培养患者发生更多并发症,死亡率更高。经验性抗生素治疗的充分性在 ACC 中似乎至关重要,尤其是在重症患者中。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36f3/10465626/5d89e98dc6d8/423_2023_3063_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36f3/10465626/5d89e98dc6d8/423_2023_3063_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/36f3/10465626/5d89e98dc6d8/423_2023_3063_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Impact of empiric antibiotic therapy on the clinical outcome of acute calculous cholecystitis.经验性抗生素治疗对急性结石性胆囊炎临床结局的影响。
Langenbecks Arch Surg. 2023 Aug 29;408(1):345. doi: 10.1007/s00423-023-03063-4.
2
Microbiological etiology and current resistance patterns in acute calculous cholecystitis.急性结石性胆囊炎的微生物病因学和当前耐药模式。
Cir Esp (Engl Ed). 2024 Jul;102(7):373-380. doi: 10.1016/j.cireng.2024.04.003. Epub 2024 Apr 23.
3
Risk factors for complications in acute calculous cholecystitis. Deconstruction of the Tokyo Guidelines.急性结石性胆囊炎并发症的危险因素。《东京指南》剖析
Cir Esp (Engl Ed). 2023 Mar;101(3):170-179. doi: 10.1016/j.cireng.2022.09.016. Epub 2022 Sep 13.
4
Mortality risk estimation in acute calculous cholecystitis: beyond the Tokyo Guidelines.急性结石性胆囊炎病死率评估:超越东京指南。
World J Emerg Surg. 2021 May 11;16(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s13017-021-00368-x.
5
Index cholecystectomy in grade II and III acute calculous cholecystitis is feasible and safe.二级和三级急性结石性胆囊炎的择期胆囊切除术是可行且安全的。
ANZ J Surg. 2015 Nov;85(11):854-9. doi: 10.1111/ans.12986. Epub 2015 Feb 2.
6
Usefulness of intraoperative bile culture in patients with acute calculous cholecystitis with previous biliary events: does the postoperative management change?术中胆汁培养在既往胆道事件的急性结石性胆囊炎患者中的应用价值:术后处理是否会改变?
Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis. 2024 Jan;43(1):133-138. doi: 10.1007/s10096-023-04713-7. Epub 2023 Nov 20.
7
Effect of postoperative antibiotic administration on postoperative infection following cholecystectomy for acute calculous cholecystitis: a randomized clinical trial.术后抗生素应用对急性结石性胆囊炎行胆囊切除术术后感染的影响:一项随机临床试验。
JAMA. 2014 Jul;312(2):145-54. doi: 10.1001/jama.2014.7586.
8
Comparison of laparoscopic cholecystectomy and delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy in aged acute calculous cholecystitis: a cohort study.老年急性结石性胆囊炎行腹腔镜胆囊切除术与延期腹腔镜胆囊切除术的比较:一项队列研究。
Surg Endosc. 2020 Jul;34(7):2994-3001. doi: 10.1007/s00464-019-07091-4. Epub 2019 Aug 28.
9
Diagnosis and management of acute cholecystitis: a single-centre audit of guideline adherence and patient outcomes.急性胆囊炎的诊断和治疗:一项针对指南遵循情况和患者结局的单中心审计。
Can J Surg. 2020 May 8;63(3):E241-E249. doi: 10.1503/cjs.002719.
10
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy versus antibiotic therapy for acute cholecystitis in patients over 75 years: Randomized clinical trial and retrospective cohort study.腹腔镜胆囊切除术与抗生素治疗对 75 岁以上急性胆囊炎患者的作用:随机临床试验和回顾性队列研究。
Scand J Surg. 2023 Dec;112(4):219-226. doi: 10.1177/14574969231178650. Epub 2023 Aug 12.

引用本文的文献

1
eHealth and mHealth in Antimicrobial Stewardship to Reduce Mortality in Empirical Antimicrobial Therapy and a Systematic Review with a Meta-Analysis of Adequate Therapy.电子健康和移动健康在抗菌药物管理中的应用,以降低经验性抗菌治疗的死亡率及一项关于充分治疗的系统评价与荟萃分析
Infect Dis Rep. 2024 Aug 1;16(4):707-723. doi: 10.3390/idr16040054.
2
Updates on Antibiotic Regimens in Acute Cholecystitis.急性胆囊炎抗生素治疗方案的最新进展。
Medicina (Kaunas). 2024 Jun 25;60(7):1040. doi: 10.3390/medicina60071040.

本文引用的文献

1
Scientific evidence of the duration of antibiotic treatment in intra-abdominal infections with surgical focus control.外科焦点控制下腹腔感染抗生素治疗持续时间的科学证据。
Cir Esp (Engl Ed). 2022 Oct;100(10):608-613. doi: 10.1016/j.cireng.2022.06.042. Epub 2022 Jun 24.
2
Antibiotic prophylaxis for acute cholecystectomy: PEANUTS II multicentre randomized non-inferiority clinical trial.急性胆囊切除术抗生素预防:PEANUTS II 多中心随机非劣效性临床试验。
Br J Surg. 2022 Feb 24;109(3):267-273. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znab441.
3
Mortality risk estimation in acute calculous cholecystitis: beyond the Tokyo Guidelines.
急性结石性胆囊炎病死率评估:超越东京指南。
World J Emerg Surg. 2021 May 11;16(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s13017-021-00368-x.
4
Antibiotic selection based on microbiology and resistance profiles of bile from gallbladder of patients with acute cholecystitis.基于急性胆囊炎患者胆汁的微生物学和耐药谱进行抗生素选择。
Sci Rep. 2021 Feb 3;11(1):2969. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-82603-8.
5
Management of acute cholecystitis in elderly patients: A propensity score-matched analysis of surgical vs. medical treatment.老年患者急性胆囊炎的治疗:手术与药物治疗的倾向评分匹配分析。
Dig Liver Dis. 2021 Dec;53(12):1620-1626. doi: 10.1016/j.dld.2021.01.011. Epub 2021 Jan 23.
6
Association of Frailty With Morbidity and Mortality in Emergency General Surgery by Procedural Risk Level.虚弱与按手术风险水平分层的急诊普通外科患者的发病率和死亡率的相关性。
JAMA Surg. 2021 Jan 1;156(1):68-74. doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2020.5397.
7
[Biliary microbiote in cholecystectomized patients: Review of empirical antibiotherapy].胆囊切除患者的胆道微生物群:经验性抗菌治疗综述
Rev Esp Quimioter. 2019 Oct;32(5):426-431. Epub 2019 Sep 18.
8
Frailty in Older Patients Undergoing Emergency Laparotomy: Results From the UK Observational Emergency Laparotomy and Frailty (ELF) Study.老年急诊剖腹手术患者的脆弱性:来自英国观察性急诊剖腹手术和脆弱性(ELF)研究的结果。
Ann Surg. 2021 Apr 1;273(4):709-718. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000003402.
9
Tokyo Guidelines 2018: antimicrobial therapy for acute cholangitis and cholecystitis.东京指南 2018:急性胆管炎和胆囊炎的抗菌治疗。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018 Jan;25(1):3-16. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.518. Epub 2018 Jan 9.
10
Tokyo Guidelines 2018: flowchart for the management of acute cholecystitis.东京指南 2018:急性胆囊炎管理流程图。
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2018 Jan;25(1):55-72. doi: 10.1002/jhbp.516. Epub 2017 Dec 20.