Zhou Fan, Bu Weichao, Fan Hongjie, Guo Shuirong, Qi Ming, Yao Gaohua, Bei Yijiang, Huang Yuanfei, Zhu Shicheng, Ding Xueyan, Xiang Xingwei
Zhejiang Fisheries Technical Extension Center, Hangzhou 310012, China.
College of Food Science and Technology, Zhejiang University of Technology, Hangzhou 310014, China.
Metabolites. 2024 Aug 9;14(8):443. doi: 10.3390/metabo14080443.
To investigate difference in the quality of the different parts (back, tail muscles, and fish skin) of from pond and rice field cultures, a comparative study was conducted in terms of nutritional composition, volatile flavor profiles and gut microbiota. In detail, the texture, free amino acids, fatty acids were further assessed. The results suggested that the moisture content, crude protein and crude fat content in the skin of are higher than those in the back and tail muscles, regardless of breeding modes. The fish cultured in the rice field had a higher protein content than those from the pond culture, while the fat content of the rice field-cultured fish was significantly low compared to the fish from the pond culture, especially in the back and tail parts. A total of 43 volatile components were detected by Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry (GC-MS), with a maximum of 18 types of aldehydes and the highest concentration being nonanal. Compared to pond cultures, the fish from the rice field cultures showed more abundant flavor composition and odor-active compounds. The total content of DHA (Docosahexaenoic Acid) and EPA (Eicosapentaenoic Acid) in the rice field-cultured fish was higher than that of the pond group, while no significant disparity in amino acid composition was observed ( > 0.05). Comparative and clustering analyses of gut microbiota revealed notable discrepancies in the gut microbiota of from two aquaculture systems. However, an inherent correlation between the gut microbiome and meat quality would be further emphasized in further studies. This study can offer a theoretical reference for the development of high-quality aquatic products by selecting the appropriate aquaculture models.
为了研究池塘养殖和稻田养殖的[鱼名]不同部位(背部、尾部肌肉和鱼皮)的品质差异,从营养成分、挥发性风味特征和肠道微生物群方面进行了一项比较研究。具体而言,进一步评估了质地、游离氨基酸和脂肪酸。结果表明,无论养殖模式如何,[鱼名]鱼皮中的水分、粗蛋白和粗脂肪含量均高于背部和尾部肌肉。稻田养殖的鱼蛋白质含量高于池塘养殖的鱼,而稻田养殖鱼的脂肪含量与池塘养殖的鱼相比显著较低,尤其是在背部和尾部。通过气相色谱-质谱联用仪(GC-MS)共检测到43种挥发性成分,其中醛类最多有18种,含量最高的是壬醛。与池塘养殖相比,稻田养殖的鱼风味成分和气味活性化合物更为丰富。稻田养殖鱼中DHA(二十二碳六烯酸)和EPA(二十碳五烯酸)的总含量高于池塘组,而氨基酸组成没有显著差异(P>0.05)。肠道微生物群的比较和聚类分析显示,来自两种养殖系统的[鱼名]肠道微生物群存在显著差异。然而,肠道微生物组与肉质之间的内在相关性将在进一步研究中得到进一步强调。本研究可为通过选择合适的养殖模式开发高品质水产品提供理论参考。