Department of Urology, School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Lubbock, Texas.
Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, School of Medicine, Texas Tech University Health Sciences Center, Odessa, Texas.
Urol Pract. 2024 Nov;11(6):906-914. doi: 10.1097/UPJ.0000000000000660. Epub 2024 Jun 28.
Patient satisfaction surveys, used as a quality indicator, play a role in determining reimbursement. Quality-based payments have been used by Medicare for physician reimbursement since 2015. Numerous papers report a scoring bias associated with nonmodifiable patient demographics, such as age or gender. Our systematic review across multiple specialties determines if patient age influences patient satisfaction scores.
A focused literature search using Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses guidelines was performed using the PubMed database. Odds ratios (ORs), fixed-effects modeling, and presence of publication bias were calculated for an overall summary.
Out of 387 reviewed papers, 12 articles were selected for this systematic review resulting in a total of 174,558 patients. Selected studies included hospital level and surgical specialty data of patient satisfaction scores of their physician providers only. Overall, our analysis revealed an OR of 1.36 (95% CI 1.23-1.50; I = 99.4%; < .0001). The inpatient setting showed an OR of 1.18 (1.07-1.30; I = 99.1%; < .001). The outpatient setting showed an OR of 1.38 (1.24-1.55; I = 99.5%; < .001). Funnel plot and bias test did not show publication bias in both the inpatient and outpatient settings ( = .242, and .139, respectively).
A positive and statistically significant relationship exists between patient age and satisfaction scores with their physicians, meaning that older patients are more satisfied with their physician providers. This relationship was more pronounced in the outpatient setting.
患者满意度调查作为一种质量指标,在确定报销方面发挥着作用。自 2015 年以来,医疗保险一直将基于质量的支付用于医生报销。许多论文报告了与不可改变的患者人口统计学特征(如年龄或性别)相关的评分偏差。我们的多专科系统评价确定患者年龄是否会影响患者满意度评分。
使用系统评价和荟萃分析的首选报告项目(Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses,PRISMA)指南,在 PubMed 数据库中进行了重点文献搜索。计算了总体汇总的比值比(odds ratio,OR)、固定效应模型和发表偏倚的存在。
在 387 篇综述文章中,有 12 篇文章被选入本系统综述,共纳入 174558 名患者。入选的研究仅包括医院级别和外科专业的患者对其医生提供者的满意度评分数据。总体而言,我们的分析显示 OR 为 1.36(95%置信区间 1.23-1.50;I = 99.4%;<.0001)。住院患者的 OR 为 1.18(1.07-1.30;I = 99.1%;<.001)。门诊患者的 OR 为 1.38(1.24-1.55;I = 99.5%;<.001)。漏斗图和偏倚检验显示,住院和门诊环境均无发表偏倚(分别为 =.242 和.139)。
患者年龄与对医生的满意度之间存在正相关且具有统计学意义,这意味着年龄较大的患者对医生提供者的满意度更高。这种关系在门诊环境中更为明显。