Lauren Tietje, Michelle Funk, Divya Ramachandran, Andrew Weidemiller, Mehreen Chaudhry, Frances Lendacki, Rachel Bernard, Stephanie Gretsch, Kayla English, and Mary Kate Schroeter are with the Chicago Department of Public Health (CDPH), Chicago, IL. Isaac Ghinai, Antea Cooper, Lindsay Barranco, and Karrie-Ann Toews are with the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, GA. Elizabeth L. Tung is with the Section of General Internal Medicine, University of Chicago, Chicago. Brian Borah, Ben Gerber, Bernice Man, Rebecca Singer, Stockton Mayer, and Suzanne Falck are with University of Illinois at Chicago. Elizabeth Bell, Angela Moss, and Elizabeth Davis are with Rush University Medical Center, Chicago. Thomas D. Huggett, Caroline Cool, and Wayne M. Detmer are with Lawndale Christian Health Center, Chicago. Mary Tornabene is with Heartland Alliance Health, Chicago. Josh Boegner, Erik Elias Glenn, and Gregory Phillips II are with the Department of Medical Social Sciences, Northwestern University, Evanston, IL.
Am J Public Health. 2024 Oct;114(S7):S590-S598. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2024.307801. Epub 2024 Aug 28.
To compare the incidence, case-hospitalization rates, and vaccination rates of COVID-19 between people experiencing sheltered homelessness (PESH) and the broader community in Chicago, Illinois, and describe the impact of a whole community approach to disease mitigation during the public health emergency. Incidence of COVID-19 among PESH was compared with community-wide incidence using case-based surveillance data from March 1, 2020, to May 11, 2023. Seven-day rolling means of COVID-19 incidence were assessed for the overall study period and for each of 6 distinct waves of COVID-19 transmission. A total of 774 009 cases of COVID-19 were detected: 2579 among PESH and 771 430 in the broader community. Incidence and hospitalization rates per 100 000 in PESH were more than 5 times higher (99.84 vs 13.94 and 16.88 vs 2.14) than the community at large in wave 1 (March 1, 2020-October 3, 2020). This difference decreased through wave 3 (March 7, 2021-June 26, 2021), with PESH having a lower incidence rate per 100 000 than the wider community (8.02 vs 13.03). Incidence and hospitalization of PESH rose again to rates higher than the broader community in waves 4 through 6 but never returned to wave 1 levels. Throughout the study period, COVID-19 incidence among PESH was 2.88 times higher than that of the community (70.90 vs 24.65), and hospitalization was 4.56 times higher among PESH (7.51 vs 1.65). Our findings suggest that whole-community approaches can minimize disparities in severe acute respiratory syndrome coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) transmission between vulnerable populations and the broader community, and reinforce the benefits of a shared approach that include multiple partners when addressing public health emergencies in special populations. (. 2024;114(S7):S590-S598. https://doi.org/10.2105/AJPH.2024.307801).
为了比较在伊利诺伊州芝加哥,经历庇护性无家可归的人与更广泛社区的 COVID-19 发病率、病例住院率和疫苗接种率,并描述在公共卫生紧急情况下,针对疾病缓解采取的整体社区方法的影响。使用 2020 年 3 月 1 日至 2023 年 5 月 11 日的基于病例的监测数据,比较经历庇护性无家可归的人与更广泛社区的 COVID-19 发病率。评估了整个研究期间和 COVID-19 传播的 6 个不同波次的 COVID-19 发病率的 7 天滚动平均值。共检测到 774009 例 COVID-19:2579 例发生在经历庇护性无家可归的人身上,771430 例发生在更广泛的社区。在第 1 波(2020 年 3 月 1 日至 2020 年 10 月 3 日)中,经历庇护性无家可归的人的发病率和住院率每 10 万人中超过 5 倍(99.84 比 13.94 和 16.88 比 2.14)比整个社区高。这一差异在第 3 波(2021 年 3 月 7 日至 2021 年 6 月 26 日)期间有所下降,经历庇护性无家可归的人的发病率每 10 万人中低于更广泛的社区(8.02 比 13.03)。在第 4 波至第 6 波期间,经历庇护性无家可归的人的发病率和住院率再次上升至高于整个社区的水平,但从未恢复到第 1 波的水平。在整个研究期间,经历庇护性无家可归的人的 COVID-19 发病率是社区的 2.88 倍(70.90 比 24.65),住院率是社区的 4.56 倍(7.51 比 1.65)。我们的研究结果表明,整体社区方法可以最大限度地减少弱势群体与整个社区之间严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒 2(SARS-CoV-2)传播的差异,并在特殊人群中应对公共卫生紧急情况时加强共享方法的益处,该方法包括多个合作伙伴。