Chiou Shyh-Shin, Weng Te-Fu, Wang Jiaan-Der
Graduate Institute of Clinical Medicine, College of Medicine, Kaohsiung Medical University, Kaohsiung, Taiwan; Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Pediatrics, Kaohsiung Medical University Hospital, Kaohsiung, Taiwan.
Department of Pediatrics, Chung Shan Medical University Hospital, Taichung City, Taiwan.
Value Health Reg Issues. 2025 Jan;45:101035. doi: 10.1016/j.vhri.2024.101035. Epub 2024 Aug 27.
This study evaluated the treatment preferences among patients and caregivers for moderate or severe hemophilia A in Taiwan.
This cross-sectional study used a discrete choice experiment approach to assess treatment preferences among patients with hemophilia A and their caregivers. Respondents chose between 2 hypothetical treatments defined by 7 attributes including no bleeding episode, treated events of joint bleeding, long-term safety, type of treatment and risk of thromboembolic events, administration frequency, consumption route, and monitoring dosing options. Preference weights and relative importance (RI) of attributes were estimated using a hierarchical Bayesian logistic regression model.
A total of 51 eligible respondents completed the discrete choice experiment (patients, 76.5%; caregivers, 23.5%). Most patients (70.6%) had severe hemophilia and 43.1% received prophylactic treatment for >10 years. Respondents valued "type of treatment and risk of thromboembolic events" as the most important factor (RI 26.2%; 95% CI 20.9-31.5) followed by "consumption route" (RI 25.8%; 95% CI 20.7-30.9) and "administration frequency" (RI 15.2%; 95% CI 12.0-18.4). "Monitoring dosing options" was the least important attribute (RI 6.3%; 95% CI 5.2-7.4). Respondents had 63% possibility to choose a treatment profile that has factor VIII product compared with nonfactor product.
Patients and caregivers valued "type of treatment and risk of thromboembolic events" as the most important driver in choosing a treatment for moderate or severe hemophilia A. This study provides important insights into patients' preferences and informs clinicians to consider patients' choices when prescribing a treatment.
本研究评估了台湾地区中重度甲型血友病患者及其照护者的治疗偏好。
本横断面研究采用离散选择实验方法,评估甲型血友病患者及其照护者的治疗偏好。受访者需在两种由7个属性定义的假设治疗方案中进行选择,这些属性包括无出血发作、关节出血治疗事件、长期安全性、治疗类型和血栓栓塞事件风险、给药频率、用药途径以及监测剂量选项。使用分层贝叶斯逻辑回归模型估计属性的偏好权重和相对重要性(RI)。
共有51名符合条件的受访者完成了离散选择实验(患者占76.5%;照护者占23.5%)。大多数患者(70.6%)患有重度血友病,43.1%接受预防治疗超过10年。受访者将“治疗类型和血栓栓塞事件风险”视为最重要的因素(RI为26.2%;95%置信区间为20.9 - 31.5),其次是“用药途径”(RI为25.8%;95%置信区间为20.7 - 30.9)和“给药频率”(RI为15.2%;95%置信区间为12.0 - 18.4)。“监测剂量选项”是最不重要的属性(RI为6.3%;95%置信区间为5.2 - 7.4)。与非因子产品相比,受访者选择含有凝血因子VIII产品治疗方案的可能性为63%。
患者及其照护者将“治疗类型和血栓栓塞事件风险”视为选择中重度甲型血友病治疗方案时最重要的驱动因素。本研究为患者偏好提供了重要见解,并告知临床医生在开处方时考虑患者的选择。