Centre for Health Management and Policy Research, School of Public Health,Cheeloo College of Medicine, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
NHC Key Laboratory of Health Economics and Policy Research, Shandong University, Jinan, China.
JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2023 Jul 26;9:e45747. doi: 10.2196/45747.
Hemophilia A is a chronic condition that requires meticulous treatment and management. Patient preferences for prophylactic treatment can substantially influence adherence, outcomes, and quality of life, yet these preferences remain underexplored, particularly in China.
This study aimed to investigate the preferences for prophylactic treatment among Chinese adult patients with hemophilia A without inhibitors, considering clinical effectiveness, side effects, dosing mode, and dosing frequency.
A discrete choice experiment was used to elicit patient preferences for prophylactic treatment of hemophilia. The study was conducted across 7 provinces in China with socioeconomic and geographical diversity. Subgroup analysis was performed according to education level, geographic location, and treatment type, alongside the exploration of benefit-risk trade-offs.
A total of 113 patients completed the discrete choice experiment questionnaire, and we included 102 responses for analysis based on predetermined exclusion criteria. The study found that patients prioritized reducing annual bleeding times and avoiding the risk of developing inhibitors over treatment process attributes. Subgroup analysis revealed that lower-educated patients and those from rural areas attached more importance to the dosing mode, likely due to barriers to self-administration. Patients demonstrated a clear understanding of benefit-risk trade-offs, exhibiting a willingness to accept an increased risk of developing inhibitors for improved clinical outcomes.
This study provides valuable insights into the preferences of patients with hemophilia A for prophylactic treatment in China. Understanding these preferences can enhance shared decision-making between patients and clinicians, fostering personalized prophylactic treatment plans that may optimize adherence and improve clinical outcomes.
血友病 A 是一种慢性疾病,需要精心治疗和管理。患者对预防性治疗的偏好可以极大地影响依从性、结局和生活质量,但这些偏好仍未得到充分探索,尤其是在中国。
本研究旨在调查中国无抑制剂的成年血友病 A 患者对预防性治疗的偏好,考虑临床疗效、副作用、给药方式和给药频率。
采用离散选择实验来引出患者对血友病预防性治疗的偏好。该研究在中国 7 个具有社会经济和地理多样性的省份进行。根据教育水平、地理位置和治疗类型进行亚组分析,并探讨了获益-风险权衡。
共有 113 名患者完成了离散选择实验问卷,我们根据预定的排除标准纳入了 102 份分析响应。研究发现,患者优先考虑减少年出血次数和避免产生抑制剂的风险,而不是治疗过程的属性。亚组分析显示,受教育程度较低的患者和来自农村地区的患者更重视给药方式,这可能是由于自我给药的障碍。患者对获益-风险权衡有清晰的认识,表现出愿意接受增加产生抑制剂的风险,以换取改善的临床结果。
本研究提供了中国血友病 A 患者对预防性治疗偏好的有价值的见解。了解这些偏好可以增强患者和临床医生之间的共同决策,制定个性化的预防性治疗计划,从而可能提高依从性并改善临床结局。