International Centre for Evidence in Disability, Department of Population Health, Faculty of Epidemiology and Population Health, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, WC1E 7HT, UK.
Millennium Nucleus Studies on Disability and Citizenship (DISCA), Santiago, Chile.
Int J Equity Health. 2024 Aug 29;23(1):174. doi: 10.1186/s12939-024-02259-4.
Around 18% of the population in Chile has disabilities. Evidence shows that this population has greater healthcare needs, yet they face barriers to accessing healthcare due to health system failures. This paper aims to assess the inclusion of people with disabilities in health policy documents and to explore the perceptions of key national stakeholders regarding the policy context, policy processes, and actors involved.
A policy content analysis was conducted of 12 health policy documents using the EquiFrame framework, adapted to assess disability inclusion. Documents were reviewed and rated on their quality of commitment against 21 core concepts of human rights in the framework. Key national stakeholders (n = 15) were interviewed, and data were thematically analysed under the Walt and Gilson Policy Analysis Triangle, using NVivo R1.
Core human rights concepts of disability were mentioned at least once in nearly all health policy documents (92%). However, 50% had poor policy commitments for disability. Across policies, Prevention of health conditions was the main human rights concept reflected, while Privacy of information was the least referenced concept. Participants described a fragmented disability movement and health policy, related to a dominant biomedical model of disability. It appeared that disability was not prioritized in the health policy agenda, due to ineffective mainstreaming of disability by the Government and the limited influence and engagement of civil society in policy processes. Moreover, the limited existing policy framework on disability inclusion is not being implemented effectively. This implementation gap was attributed to lack of financing, leadership, and human resources, coupled with low monitoring of disability inclusion.
Improvements are needed in both the development and implementation of disability-inclusive health policies in Chile, to support the achievement of the right to healthcare for people with disabilities and ensuring that the health system truly "leaves no one behind".
智利约有 18%的人口存在残疾。有证据表明,这部分人群有着更大的医疗保健需求,但由于医疗体系的失败,他们在获得医疗保健方面面临障碍。本文旨在评估残疾人士在卫生政策文件中的纳入情况,并探讨主要国家利益攸关方对政策背景、政策过程和所涉行为者的看法。
使用适应残疾纳入评估的 EquiFrame 框架,对 12 份卫生政策文件进行了政策内容分析。根据框架中的 21 个人权核心概念,对文件的承诺质量进行了审查和评分。对 15 名主要国家利益攸关方进行了访谈,并在 Walt 和 Gilson 政策分析三角的框架下,对数据进行了主题分析,使用 NVivo R1。
几乎所有卫生政策文件(92%)都至少提到了一次残疾核心人权概念,但 50%的文件对残疾问题的政策承诺较差。在各项政策中,预防健康状况是反映最多的人权概念,而信息隐私则是最少提及的概念。参与者描述了一个支离破碎的残疾运动和卫生政策,这与残疾的主导生物医学模式有关。似乎由于政府未能有效地将残疾问题纳入主流,以及民间社会在政策进程中的影响力和参与度有限,残疾问题在卫生政策议程中没有得到优先考虑。此外,现有的关于残疾包容的政策框架也没有得到有效执行。这种执行差距归因于缺乏资金、领导力和人力资源,加上对残疾包容的监测不足。
智利需要在制定和执行残疾包容的卫生政策方面进行改进,以支持实现残疾人士的医疗保健权利,并确保卫生系统真正“不落下任何人”。