• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

基于机构、资历和部门的教师高阶思维技能分类及判别分析

Classification of Higher-Order Thinking Skills of the Teachers Based on Institution, Seniority, and Branch with Discriminant Analysis.

作者信息

Ulu-Kalin Özlem, Kumandaş-Öztürk Hatice

机构信息

Faculty of Education, Artvin Coruh University, 08000 Artvin, Türkiye.

出版信息

Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Jul 23;14(8):626. doi: 10.3390/bs14080626.

DOI:10.3390/bs14080626
PMID:39199022
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11351380/
Abstract

The present study aimed to determine the variations between higher-order thinking skills (critical, creative, and empathetic thinking) of the teachers based on institution, branch, and professional seniority. The study data were collected from 345 teachers with the Critical Thinking Tendency Scale, Marmara Creative Thinking Aptitudes Scale, and Basic Empathy Scale, and confirmatory factor analysis was conducted on the data. The data were analyzed with discriminant analysis. The study findings demonstrated that there were significant differences between the critical, creative, and empathetic thinking skills of the teachers based on the institution of employment, their seniority, and their branch. The analysis of the discriminant functions revealed that the most discriminatory variables were empathy based on the institution and creative thinking based on seniority and branch. It was determined that the teachers employed in pre- and primary schools with less than 15 years of seniority scored higher in critical thinking skills, and teachers who were employed in middle schools with 16 years or more seniority scored higher in creative thinking skills. Foreign language teachers scored higher in both thinking skills. Finally, the mean empathy skill scores of the teachers employed in pre- and primary schools with 15 years or less seniority in the common branch were higher.

摘要

本研究旨在确定基于机构、部门和专业资历的教师高阶思维技能(批判性、创造性和共情性思维)之间的差异。研究数据来自345名教师,使用批判性思维倾向量表、马尔马拉创造性思维能力量表和基本共情量表进行收集,并对数据进行验证性因素分析。数据采用判别分析进行分析。研究结果表明,基于就业机构、资历和部门,教师的批判性、创造性和共情性思维技能存在显著差异。判别函数分析显示,最具区分性的变量是基于机构的共情和基于资历及部门的创造性思维。研究确定,资历少于15年的中小学教师在批判性思维技能方面得分较高,资历为16年或以上的中学教师在创造性思维技能方面得分较高。外语教师在两种思维技能方面得分都较高。最后,资历在15年及以下的普通部门中小学教师的平均共情技能得分较高。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9ae/11351380/cb4fba336602/behavsci-14-00626-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9ae/11351380/cb4fba336602/behavsci-14-00626-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e9ae/11351380/cb4fba336602/behavsci-14-00626-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Classification of Higher-Order Thinking Skills of the Teachers Based on Institution, Seniority, and Branch with Discriminant Analysis.基于机构、资历和部门的教师高阶思维技能分类及判别分析
Behav Sci (Basel). 2024 Jul 23;14(8):626. doi: 10.3390/bs14080626.
2
Ethnocultural empathy development of future language teachers through digital multiliteracy resources for low-literacy adult migrants.通过针对低文化水平成年移民的数字多素养资源培养未来语言教师的民族文化同理心。
Front Psychol. 2024 Jun 5;15:1398457. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1398457. eCollection 2024.
3
Primary teachers' attitudes towards using new technology and stimulating higher-order thinking in students: A profile analysis.小学教师对使用新技术及激发学生高阶思维的态度:一项概况分析。
Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2023;28(6):6347-6372. doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11413-w. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
4
Understanding levels of technology integration: A TPACK scale for EFL teachers to promote 21st-century learning.理解技术整合水平:一个供英语外语教师促进21世纪学习的TPACK量表。
Educ Inf Technol (Dordr). 2022;27(7):9935-9952. doi: 10.1007/s10639-022-11033-4. Epub 2022 Apr 7.
5
School-based interventions for reducing disciplinary school exclusion: a systematic review.基于学校的减少校内纪律性开除的干预措施:一项系统综述
Campbell Syst Rev. 2018 Jan 9;14(1):i-216. doi: 10.4073/csr.2018.1. eCollection 2018.
6
Are We on the Way to Successfully Educating Future Citizens?-A Spotlight on Critical Thinking Skills and Beliefs about the Nature of Science among Pre-Service Biology Teachers in Germany.我们正在通往成功培养未来公民的道路上吗?——聚焦德国职前生物教师的批判性思维技能以及对科学本质的信念
Behav Sci (Basel). 2023 Mar 22;13(3):279. doi: 10.3390/bs13030279.
7
Promoting creativity in early childhood education.促进幼儿教育中的创造力。
PLoS One. 2023 Dec 6;18(12):e0294915. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0294915. eCollection 2023.
8
Enhancing innovative delivery in schools using design thinking.利用设计思维增强学校的创新教学。
F1000Res. 2021 Sep 15;10:927. doi: 10.12688/f1000research.72860.3. eCollection 2021.
9
Philosophical dialogue among peers: a study of manifestations of critical thinking in pre-service teachers.
Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. 2001;6(1):49-67. doi: 10.1023/a:1009827102022.
10
The development of learning innovation to enhance higher order thinking skills for students in Thailand junior high schools.泰国初中学生学习创新发展以提升高阶思维能力
Heliyon. 2021 Jun 12;7(6):e07309. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2021.e07309. eCollection 2021 Jun.

本文引用的文献

1
Predicting Everyday Critical Thinking: A Review of Critical Thinking Assessments.预测日常批判性思维:批判性思维评估综述
J Intell. 2024 Feb 1;12(2):16. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence12020016.
2
Empathy-related Responding: Associations with Prosocial Behavior, Aggression, and Intergroup Relations.与同理心相关的反应:与亲社会行为、攻击行为和群体间关系的关联。
Soc Issues Policy Rev. 2010 Dec 1;4(1):143-180. doi: 10.1111/j.1751-2409.2010.01020.x.