Suppr超能文献

聋人大学生对不公平信息更敏感吗?来自一项ERP研究的证据。

Are Deaf College Students More Sensitive to Unfair Information? Evidence from an ERP Study.

作者信息

Sun Le, Dong Qi, Du Xue, Wei Dongtao

机构信息

College of Educational Science, Chongqing Normal University, Chongqing 401331, China.

Key Laboratory of Cognition and Personality, Ministry of Education, Southwest University, Chongqing 400715, China.

出版信息

Brain Sci. 2024 Aug 2;14(8):788. doi: 10.3390/brainsci14080788.

Abstract

To better understand the individual differences in fairness, we used event-related potentials (ERPs) to explore the fairness characteristics of deaf college students through the ultimatum game task. Behaviorally, the significant main effect of the proposal type was found, which meant both deaf and hearing college students showed a lower acceptance rate for the more unfair proposal. Interestingly, we found a significant interaction between group and proposal type in the early stage (N1). Moreover, in the deaf college group, N1 (induced by moderately and very unfair proposals) was significantly larger than that of fair proposals. However, we found that deaf college students had smaller amplitudes on P2 and P3 than hearing college students. These results suggested that deaf college students might pursue more equity strongly so they are more sensitive to unfair information in the early stage. In a word, we should provide more fair allocations for deaf college students in our harmonious society.

摘要

为了更好地理解公平性方面的个体差异,我们通过最后通牒博弈任务,利用事件相关电位(ERP)来探究聋人大学生的公平性特征。行为学上,发现提议类型存在显著的主效应,这意味着聋人和听力正常的大学生对更不公平的提议接受率都较低。有趣的是,我们在早期阶段(N1)发现了群体和提议类型之间的显著交互作用。此外,在聋人大学生组中,(由中度和非常不公平的提议诱发的)N1波幅显著大于公平提议诱发的N1波幅。然而,我们发现聋人大学生的P2波和P3波幅比听力正常的大学生小。这些结果表明,聋人大学生可能更强烈地追求公平,因此他们在早期阶段对不公平信息更敏感。总之,在我们和谐的社会中,应该为聋人大学生提供更多公平的分配。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/e8ae/11352934/7aea2f2e4e31/brainsci-14-00788-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验