Hawthorn Campus, Department of Interior Architecture & Industrial Design, Centre for Design Innovation; Swinburne University of Technology, John St, Hawthorn, VIC 3122, Australia.
Parkville Campus, Melbourne School of Design, University of Melbourne, Masson Rd, Parkville, VIC 3010, Australia.
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Aug 16;21(8):1080. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21081080.
By identifying a unified aim of Federal, State, and Local government authorities to deliver healthier, more liveable urban spaces and enable walkable neighbourhoods in Melbourne, Australia, questions emerge regarding noise data collection methods and the policies that aim to protect pedestrian areas from potential increases in urban traffic noise. It highlights a missed opportunity to develop strategies that provide explicit guidance for designing more compact urban forms without diminishing pedestrian amenities. This study investigates the governance of traffic-induced noise pollution and its impact on pedestrian amenities in Melbourne, Australia. It aims to identify the government bodies best positioned to protect pedestrians from noise pollution and evaluate the strategic justification for reducing traffic noise to enhance urban walkability. This research employs a semi-systematic policy selection method and a hybrid critique and review method to evaluate the multidisciplinary governance frameworks engaged in the management and mitigation of traffic noise in Melbourne. Key findings reveal that while traffic noise poses significant health risks, current policies overlook its impact on pedestrian amenities in urban areas. This study emphasises the benefits of qualitative and subjective noise data collection to inform policy-makers of the pedestrian aural experience and impacts. Discussion points include noise management strategies and the value of implementing metropolitan-scale noise-mapping to illustrate the impact of noise rather than quantities of sound. The conclusions demonstrate that there is strategic justification for managing traffic-induced noise pollution to protect pedestrian areas within international, federal, and state government policies and implicit rationale at a local level.
通过确定联邦、州和地方政府的统一目标,即提供更健康、更宜居的城市空间,并使澳大利亚墨尔本的社区能够步行,就出现了有关噪声数据收集方法以及旨在保护行人区免受城市交通噪声潜在增加影响的政策的问题。它突显了错失了一个机会,没有制定出明确的战略,为设计更紧凑的城市形态提供指导,而不会减少行人的便利设施。本研究调查了澳大利亚墨尔本交通引起的噪声污染及其对行人便利设施的影响。它旨在确定最有能力保护行人免受噪声污染的政府机构,并评估减少交通噪声以提高城市步行能力的战略合理性。本研究采用半系统的政策选择方法和混合批判与审查方法,评估了参与墨尔本交通噪声管理和缓解的多学科治理框架。主要研究结果表明,尽管交通噪声对健康构成重大风险,但现行政策并未考虑其对城市地区行人便利设施的影响。本研究强调了定性和主观噪声数据收集的好处,以便为决策者提供行人的听觉体验和影响的信息。讨论点包括噪声管理策略和实施城市规模噪声测绘的价值,以说明噪声的影响而不是声音的数量。研究结果表明,在国际、联邦和州政府政策以及地方一级的隐含理由中,有管理交通引起的噪声污染以保护行人区的战略合理性。