Koca David Sinan, Dietrich-Ntoukas Tina
Department of Ophthalmology, Charité-University Medicine Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin, Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, and Berlin Institute of Health, Augustenburger Platz 1, 13353 Berlin, Germany.
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 12;13(16):4728. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164728.
The purpose of the study was to evaluate the frequency of topical immunomodulatory and immunosuppressive therapies in patients with ocular chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) in consideration of inflammatory activity and systemic immunosuppressive therapies in a tertiary care university hospital setting. We included 95 adult patients (48 male, 47 female) with ocular chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) after alloHSCT (median age 49.5 years). Clinical ophthalmological findings and the grade of ocular cGVHD according to the NIH eye score and the German-Austrian-Swiss Consensus (GAS) Grading were analyzed. Systemic GVHD manifestations as well as the prevalence of topical and systemic (immunomodulatory) therapies were assessed. A total of 74 of 95 patients (77.8%) had manifestations of systemic chronic graft-versus-host disease other than ocular GVHD. 68.42% (65/95) of patients were under systemic immunosuppressive therapy with at least one immunosuppressive medication. All patients (95/95) received lid-margin hygiene and phosphate- and preservative-free lubricating eye drops. Twenty-five percent of the cohort (24/95) were treated with autologous serum eye drops (ASEDs). In total, 80% (76/95) of patients required topical steroid therapy to treat acute exacerbation of inflammation at least once; continuous topical steroid therapy was only necessary for a minor part (12%) with refractory chronic inflammation. A total of 92.63% (88/95) were primarily treated with ciclosporin A 0.1% as Ikervis, of whom at least one third did not continue the therapy because of intolerable side effects during follow-up and received alternative topical formulations. Our data show that patients with ocular cGVHD mostly need topical therapy including anti-inflammatory agents despite systemic immunosuppressive therapy. In our cohort, 80% of patients received topical steroids, and more than 90% received topical ciclosporin A eye drops, which were tolerated by only two thirds of patients due to side effects.
本研究的目的是在一所三级大学医院环境中,考虑炎症活动和全身免疫抑制治疗,评估眼部慢性移植物抗宿主病(cGVHD)患者局部免疫调节和免疫抑制治疗的频率。我们纳入了95例异基因造血干细胞移植(alloHSCT)后患有眼部慢性移植物抗宿主病(cGVHD)的成年患者(48例男性,47例女性)(中位年龄49.5岁)。分析了临床眼科检查结果以及根据美国国立卫生研究院(NIH)眼部评分和德-奥-瑞共识(GAS)分级的眼部cGVHD分级。评估了全身GVHD表现以及局部和全身(免疫调节)治疗的患病率。95例患者中有74例(77.8%)除眼部GVHD外还存在全身慢性移植物抗宿主病表现。68.42%(65/95)的患者正在接受至少一种免疫抑制药物的全身免疫抑制治疗。所有患者(95/95)均接受睑缘清洁以及不含磷酸盐和防腐剂的润滑眼药水治疗。25%(24/95)的队列患者接受了自体血清眼药水(ASED)治疗。总体而言,80%(76/95)的患者至少需要一次局部类固醇治疗以治疗炎症急性加重;仅一小部分(12%)难治性慢性炎症患者需要持续局部类固醇治疗。共有92.63%(88/95)的患者最初接受0.1%环孢素A作为Ikervis治疗,其中至少三分之一的患者在随访期间因无法耐受的副作用而未继续治疗,并接受了替代局部制剂。我们的数据表明,尽管进行了全身免疫抑制治疗,但眼部cGVHD患者大多需要包括抗炎药在内的局部治疗。在我们的队列中,80%的患者接受了局部类固醇治疗,超过90%的患者接受了局部环孢素A眼药水治疗,由于副作用,只有三分之二的患者能够耐受。