• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

优化糖尿病性黄斑水肿治疗:阈下微脉冲激光与抗血管内皮生长因子联合治疗的Meta分析

Optimizing Diabetic Macular Edema Treatment: A Meta-Analysis of Subthreshold Micropulse Laser and Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Combination Therapy.

作者信息

Ma Ching-Chih, Chen Po-Huang, Hsieh Yun-Hsiu

机构信息

Department of Ophthalmology, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan.

Department of Internal Medicine, Tri-Service General Hospital, National Defense Medical Center, Taipei 114, Taiwan.

出版信息

J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 14;13(16):4782. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164782.

DOI:10.3390/jcm13164782
PMID:39200924
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11355810/
Abstract

Diabetic macular edema (DME) is the primary cause of visual impairment in individuals with diabetes. Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) is the current first-line treatment for DME owing to its effectiveness. However, frequent anti-VEGF injections may be inconvenient for patients. Therefore, this study aimed to investigate whether the addition of subthreshold micropulse laser (SML) to anti-VEGF therapy could reduce the requirement for anti-VEGF injections while maintaining the treatment efficacy for DME. Clinical trials retrieved from the databases of PubMed, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Library were evaluated to determine the effectiveness of combination treatment with SML and anti-VEGF medication compared with that of anti-VEGF treatment alone. The primary outcome measures were the changes in CMT, best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA), and the total number of intravitreal injections (IVIs). The IVI + SML group revealed a substantial increase in the logarithm of the minimum angle of the resolution BCVA and a reduction in CMT at the 12-month follow-up (BCVA: random-effects; mean difference [MD], -0.05; 95% confidence interval [CI]: -0.10 to -0.01; -value = 0.28, and CMT: random-effects; MD, -18.27; 95% confidence interval, -27.36 to -9.18; -value = 0.20). The number of required IVIs in the IVI + SML group was lower than that in the IVI only group (random-effects; MD, -2.22; 95% CI: -3.13 to -1.31; -value < 0.01). Combining SML therapy with anti-VEGF injections may reduce the total number of injections required, improve VA, and reduce CMT at the 12-month follow-up. Although the included studies used different SML regimens and anti-VEGF agents, this review indicates that the application of additional SML therapy results in positive clinical outcomes.

摘要

糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)是糖尿病患者视力损害的主要原因。抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)因其有效性,是目前DME的一线治疗方法。然而,频繁注射抗VEGF对患者来说可能不方便。因此,本研究旨在探讨在抗VEGF治疗中添加阈下微脉冲激光(SML)是否能减少抗VEGF注射的需求,同时维持DME的治疗效果。对从PubMed、EMBASE和Cochrane图书馆数据库检索到的临床试验进行评估,以确定与单独抗VEGF治疗相比,SML与抗VEGF药物联合治疗的有效性。主要结局指标是中心凹视网膜厚度(CMT)、最佳矫正视力(BCVA)的变化以及玻璃体内注射(IVI)的总数。IVI+SML组在12个月随访时最佳矫正视力最小分辨角对数有显著增加,CMT降低(BCVA:随机效应;平均差[MD],-0.05;95%置信区间[CI]:-0.10至-0.01;P值=0.28,CMT:随机效应;MD,-18.27;95%置信区间-27.36至-9.18;P值=0.20)。IVI+SML组所需的IVI次数低于仅接受IVI组(随机效应;MD,-2.22;95%CI:-3.13至-1.31;P值<0.01)。在12个月随访时,SML治疗与抗VEGF注射联合使用可能会减少所需的注射总数,改善视力,并降低CMT。尽管纳入的研究使用了不同的SML方案和抗VEGF药物,但本综述表明,额外应用SML治疗可产生积极的临床结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f47c/11355810/aff2f44824d6/jcm-13-04782-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f47c/11355810/aff2f44824d6/jcm-13-04782-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f47c/11355810/aff2f44824d6/jcm-13-04782-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Optimizing Diabetic Macular Edema Treatment: A Meta-Analysis of Subthreshold Micropulse Laser and Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Combination Therapy.优化糖尿病性黄斑水肿治疗:阈下微脉冲激光与抗血管内皮生长因子联合治疗的Meta分析
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 14;13(16):4782. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164782.
2
Efficacy of anti-VEGF monotherapy versus anti-VEGF therapy with subthreshold micropulse laser (SML) in the management of diabetic macular oedema (DMO): a systematic review and meta-analysis.抗血管内皮生长因子单药治疗与亚阈值微脉冲激光(SML)联合抗血管内皮生长因子治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿(DMO)的疗效:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2024 Sep;262(9):2733-2749. doi: 10.1007/s00417-024-06405-0. Epub 2024 Feb 29.
3
Subthreshold micropulse laser combined with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for diabetic macular edema: a systematic review and meta-analysis.亚阈值微脉冲激光联合抗血管内皮生长因子治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2024 Oct;262(10):3073-3083. doi: 10.1007/s00417-024-06460-7. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
4
Subthreshold micropulse laser versus intravitreal anti-VEGF for diabetic macular edema patients with relatively better visual acuity.阈下微脉冲激光与玻璃体内注射抗血管内皮生长因子治疗视力相对较好的糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者的比较
Int J Ophthalmol. 2020 Oct 18;13(10):1606-1611. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2020.10.15. eCollection 2020.
5
Clinical efficacy of subthreshold micropulse laser combined with anti-VEGF drugs in the treatment of diabetic macular edema: A meta-analysis.亚阈值微脉冲激光联合抗 VEGF 药物治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿的临床疗效:一项荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Feb 2;103(5):e34583. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034583.
6
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of anti-VEGF monotherapy versus anti-VEGF therapy combined with subthreshold micropulse laser therapy for diabetic macular edema.抗 VEGF 单药治疗与抗 VEGF 治疗联合亚阈微脉冲激光治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿的疗效和安全性比较。
Lasers Med Sci. 2021 Sep;36(7):1545-1553. doi: 10.1007/s10103-021-03306-0. Epub 2021 Apr 4.
7
Diabetic Macular Edema and Diode Subthreshold Micropulse Laser: A Randomized Double-Masked Noninferiority Clinical Trial.糖尿病性黄斑水肿与二极管阈下微脉冲激光:一项随机双盲非劣效性临床试验。
Ophthalmology. 2023 Jan;130(1):14-27. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2022.08.012. Epub 2022 Aug 13.
8
Standard threshold laser versus subthreshold micropulse laser for adults with diabetic macular oedema: the DIAMONDS non-inferiority RCT.标准阈值激光与亚阈值微脉冲激光治疗成人糖尿病性黄斑水肿:DIAMONDS 非劣效性 RCT。
Health Technol Assess. 2022 Dec;26(50):1-86. doi: 10.3310/SZKI2484.
9
Anti-vascular endothelial growth factor combined with intravitreal steroids for diabetic macular oedema.抗血管内皮生长因子联合玻璃体内注射类固醇治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 18;4(4):CD011599. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011599.pub2.
10
The efficacy of micropulse laser combined with ranibizumab in diabetic macular edema treatment: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.微脉冲激光联合雷珠单抗治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿的疗效:一项随机对照试验的研究方案。
Trials. 2022 Sep 2;23(1):736. doi: 10.1186/s13063-022-06593-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Subthreshold Micropulse Laser for Diabetic Macular Edema: A Review.阈下微脉冲激光治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿:综述
J Clin Med. 2022 Dec 29;12(1):274. doi: 10.3390/jcm12010274.
2
Efficacy of subthreshold micropulse laser combined with ranibizumab in the treatment of diabetic macular edema.亚阈值微脉冲激光联合雷珠单抗治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿的疗效。
Int Ophthalmol. 2022 Dec;42(12):3829-3836. doi: 10.1007/s10792-022-02403-5. Epub 2022 Jul 25.
3
Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema with Aflibercept and Micropulse Laser (DAM Study).阿柏西普与微脉冲激光治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DAM研究)
Clin Ophthalmol. 2022 Apr 8;16:1109-1115. doi: 10.2147/OPTH.S360869. eCollection 2022.
4
Subthreshold micropulse laser adjuvant to bevacizumab versus bevacizumab monotherapy in treating diabetic macular edema: one- year- follow-up.亚阈值微脉冲激光辅助贝伐单抗与贝伐单抗单药治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的一年随访
Ther Adv Ophthalmol. 2021 Sep 2;13:25158414211040887. doi: 10.1177/25158414211040887. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.
5
Subthreshold Micropulse Laser Modulates Retinal Neuroinflammatory Biomarkers in Diabetic Macular Edema.阈下微脉冲激光调节糖尿病性黄斑水肿中的视网膜神经炎症生物标志物。
J Clin Med. 2021 Jul 15;10(14):3134. doi: 10.3390/jcm10143134.
6
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of anti-VEGF monotherapy versus anti-VEGF therapy combined with subthreshold micropulse laser therapy for diabetic macular edema.抗 VEGF 单药治疗与抗 VEGF 治疗联合亚阈微脉冲激光治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿的疗效和安全性比较。
Lasers Med Sci. 2021 Sep;36(7):1545-1553. doi: 10.1007/s10103-021-03306-0. Epub 2021 Apr 4.
7
Subthreshold Diode Micropulse Laser Combined with Intravitreal Therapy for Macular Edema-A Systematized Review and Critical Approach.阈下二极管微脉冲激光联合玻璃体内注射治疗黄斑水肿——一项系统评价与批判性分析
J Clin Med. 2021 Mar 31;10(7):1394. doi: 10.3390/jcm10071394.
8
Comparison of Subthreshold 577 and 810 nm Micropulse Laser Effects on Heat-Shock Protein Activation Kinetics: Implications for Treatment Efficacy and Safety.亚阈值577纳米和810纳米微脉冲激光对热休克蛋白激活动力学的影响比较:对治疗效果和安全性的启示
Transl Vis Sci Technol. 2020 Apr 28;9(5):23. doi: 10.1167/tvst.9.5.23. eCollection 2020 Apr.
9
Efficacy of combining intravitreal injections of ranibizumab with micropulse diode laser versus intravitreal injections of ranibizumab alone in diabetic macular edema (ReCaLL): a single center, randomised, controlled, non-inferiority clinical trial.联合玻璃体内注射雷珠单抗与微脉冲二极管激光与单纯玻璃体内注射雷珠单抗治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿(ReCaLL)的疗效:一项单中心、随机、对照、非劣效性临床试验。
BMC Ophthalmol. 2020 Jul 29;20(1):308. doi: 10.1186/s12886-020-01576-w.
10
Management of diabetic macular edema: experts' consensus in Taiwan.糖尿病性黄斑水肿的管理:台湾专家共识。
Jpn J Ophthalmol. 2020 May;64(3):235-242. doi: 10.1007/s10384-020-00741-4. Epub 2020 Apr 28.