• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

阈下微脉冲激光与玻璃体内注射抗血管内皮生长因子治疗视力相对较好的糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者的比较

Subthreshold micropulse laser versus intravitreal anti-VEGF for diabetic macular edema patients with relatively better visual acuity.

作者信息

Akkaya Sezen, Açıkalın Banu, Doğan Yusuf Emre, Çoban Fatih

机构信息

Departmant of Ophthalmology, Sağlık Bilimleri University, FSM Training and Research Hospital, İstanbul 34752, Turkey.

出版信息

Int J Ophthalmol. 2020 Oct 18;13(10):1606-1611. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2020.10.15. eCollection 2020.

DOI:10.18240/ijo.2020.10.15
PMID:33078112
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC7511389/
Abstract

AIM

To compare the effects of yellow (577 nm) subthreshold micropulse laser (SML) and intravitreal (IV) anti-vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) treatment in patients with diabetic macular edema (DME) with relatively better visual acuity [best corrected visual acuity (BCVA) ≤0.15 logMAR].

METHODS

The medical records of 76 eyes of 47 patients underwent IV (0.5 mg) anti-VEGF injection or SML for the DME with relatively better BCVA were reviewed. The IV group received three consecutive monthly IV anti-VEGF injections, then were retreated as needed. The laser treatment group was treated at baseline and 3mo, and then retreated at 6 and 9mo if needed. All participants were followed up for one year. The mean BCVA and mean central macular thickness (CMT) values changes over the follow-up were evaluated.

RESULTS

Twenty-four and 23 patients were assigned to the SML and IV subgroups, respectively. The mean number of treatments was 3.64±0.76 in SML group and 5.85±1.38 in IV group (<0.05). The subgroups were similar with regard to the mean BCVA score at baseline and at the 1 and 3 months, but the score of SML group was better than that of IV group at the 6, 9, and 12 months (<0.05). The decrease in the mean CMT values from baseline values was higher in SML group at the 6, 9, and 12 months (<0.05).

CONCLUSION

Yellow SML treatment is superior to IV anti-VEGF injection in DME patients with relatively better BCVA for increasing visual acuity and decreasing CMT at 6, 9, and 12mo. SML can be a good alternative first-line therapy for DME with BCVA ≤0.15 logMAR.

摘要

目的

比较黄色(577纳米)阈下微脉冲激光(SML)与玻璃体内(IV)注射抗血管内皮生长因子(VEGF)治疗对视力相对较好[最佳矫正视力(BCVA)≤0.15 logMAR]的糖尿病性黄斑水肿(DME)患者的疗效。

方法

回顾了47例接受IV(0.5毫克)抗VEGF注射或SML治疗的视力相对较好的DME患者的76只眼的病历。IV组每月连续3次玻璃体内注射抗VEGF,然后根据需要进行再次治疗。激光治疗组在基线和3个月时接受治疗,如有需要在6个月和9个月时进行再次治疗。所有参与者均随访1年。评估随访期间平均BCVA和平均中心黄斑厚度(CMT)值的变化。

结果

分别有24例和23例患者被分配到SML和IV亚组。SML组的平均治疗次数为3.64±0.76次,IV组为5.85±1.38次(<0.05)。在基线以及1个月和3个月时,亚组的平均BCVA评分相似,但在6个月、9个月和12个月时,SML组的评分优于IV组(<0.05)。在6个月、9个月和12个月时,SML组平均CMT值相对于基线值的降低幅度更大(<0.05)。

结论

对于BCVA相对较好的DME患者,黄色SML治疗在提高视力以及在6个月、9个月和12个月时降低CMT方面优于玻璃体内注射抗VEGF。对于BCVA≤0.15 logMAR的DME,SML可以作为一种良好的一线治疗替代方案。

相似文献

1
Subthreshold micropulse laser versus intravitreal anti-VEGF for diabetic macular edema patients with relatively better visual acuity.阈下微脉冲激光与玻璃体内注射抗血管内皮生长因子治疗视力相对较好的糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者的比较
Int J Ophthalmol. 2020 Oct 18;13(10):1606-1611. doi: 10.18240/ijo.2020.10.15. eCollection 2020.
2
Comparison of the efficacy and safety of anti-VEGF monotherapy versus anti-VEGF therapy combined with subthreshold micropulse laser therapy for diabetic macular edema.抗 VEGF 单药治疗与抗 VEGF 治疗联合亚阈微脉冲激光治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿的疗效和安全性比较。
Lasers Med Sci. 2021 Sep;36(7):1545-1553. doi: 10.1007/s10103-021-03306-0. Epub 2021 Apr 4.
3
Subthreshold micropulse laser combined with anti-vascular endothelial growth factor therapy for diabetic macular edema: a systematic review and meta-analysis.亚阈值微脉冲激光联合抗血管内皮生长因子治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2024 Oct;262(10):3073-3083. doi: 10.1007/s00417-024-06460-7. Epub 2024 Apr 25.
4
Optimizing Diabetic Macular Edema Treatment: A Meta-Analysis of Subthreshold Micropulse Laser and Anti-Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor Combination Therapy.优化糖尿病性黄斑水肿治疗:阈下微脉冲激光与抗血管内皮生长因子联合治疗的Meta分析
J Clin Med. 2024 Aug 14;13(16):4782. doi: 10.3390/jcm13164782.
5
Can subthreshold micropulse yellow laser treatment change the anti-vascular endothelial growth factor algorithm in diabetic macular edema? A randomized clinical trial.亚阈值微脉冲黄光疗法能否改变糖尿病黄斑水肿的抗血管内皮生长因子治疗方案?一项随机临床试验。
Indian J Ophthalmol. 2020 Jan;68(1):145-151. doi: 10.4103/ijo.IJO_350_19.
6
Comparison of ranibizumab and subthreshold micropulse laser in treatment of macular edema secondary to branch retinal vein occlusion.雷珠单抗与阈下微脉冲激光治疗视网膜分支静脉阻塞继发黄斑水肿的比较。
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2018 Nov;28(6):690-696. doi: 10.1177/1120672117750056. Epub 2018 Apr 26.
7
Clinical efficacy of subthreshold micropulse laser combined with anti-VEGF drugs in the treatment of diabetic macular edema: A meta-analysis.亚阈值微脉冲激光联合抗 VEGF 药物治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿的临床疗效:一项荟萃分析。
Medicine (Baltimore). 2024 Feb 2;103(5):e34583. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000034583.
8
Combined Intravitreal Dexamethasone Implant And Micropulse Yellow Laser For Treatment Of Anti-VEGF Resistant Diabetic Macular Edema.玻璃体内注射地塞米松植入剂联合微脉冲黄光激光治疗抗VEGF治疗抵抗的糖尿病性黄斑水肿
Open Ophthalmol J. 2017 Jul 21;11:164-172. doi: 10.2174/1874364101711010164. eCollection 2017.
9
Short pulse grid and subthreshold micropulse laser (the sandwich grid) plus intravitreal ranibizumab for the treatment of diabetic macular edema.短脉冲格栅和阈下微脉冲激光(三明治格栅)联合玻璃体内注射雷珠单抗治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿。
Int J Retina Vitreous. 2024 Sep 30;10(1):69. doi: 10.1186/s40942-024-00585-x.
10
Subthreshold micropulse laser adjuvant to bevacizumab versus bevacizumab monotherapy in treating diabetic macular edema: one- year- follow-up.亚阈值微脉冲激光辅助贝伐单抗与贝伐单抗单药治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的一年随访
Ther Adv Ophthalmol. 2021 Sep 2;13:25158414211040887. doi: 10.1177/25158414211040887. eCollection 2021 Jan-Dec.

引用本文的文献

1
Subthreshold micropulse diode laser treatment in diabetic macular edema: biological impact, therapeutic effects, and safety.亚阈值微脉冲二极管激光治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿:生物学影响、治疗效果和安全性。
Int Ophthalmol. 2024 Feb 3;44(1):3. doi: 10.1007/s10792-024-02973-6.
2
Yellow Subthreshold Micropulse Laser in Retinal Diseases: An In-Depth Analysis and Review of the Literature.黄色阈下微脉冲激光治疗视网膜疾病:文献的深入分析与综述
Ophthalmol Ther. 2023 Jun;12(3):1479-1500. doi: 10.1007/s40123-023-00698-w. Epub 2023 Mar 18.
3
Diabetic macular edema treatment with subthreshold micropulse laser - five-year long monitoring.阈下微脉冲激光治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿——五年长期监测
Biomed Pap Med Fac Univ Palacky Olomouc Czech Repub. 2023 Mar;167(1):74-79. doi: 10.5507/bp.2022.055. Epub 2023 Jan 9.
4
Subthreshold Micropulse Laser for Diabetic Macular Edema: A Review.阈下微脉冲激光治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿:综述
J Clin Med. 2022 Dec 29;12(1):274. doi: 10.3390/jcm12010274.
5
Intravitreal Ranibizumab Alone or in Combination with Calcium Dobesilate for the Treatment of Diabetic Macular Edema in Nonproliferative Diabetic Retinopathy Patients: 12-Month Outcomes of a Retrospective Study.玻璃体内雷珠单抗单用或联合羟苯磺酸钙治疗非增生性糖尿病视网膜病变患者糖尿病性黄斑水肿:一项回顾性研究的 12 个月结果。
Int J Clin Pract. 2022 Oct 20;2022:6725225. doi: 10.1155/2022/6725225. eCollection 2022.
6
Efficacy and mechanism of anti-vascular endothelial growth factor drugs for diabetic macular edema patients.抗血管内皮生长因子药物治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者的疗效及机制
World J Diabetes. 2022 Jul 15;13(7):532-542. doi: 10.4239/wjd.v13.i7.532.
7
Comparison of the 1-Year Visual and Anatomical Outcomes between Subthreshold Red (670 nm) and Yellow (577 nm) Micro-Pulse Laser Treatment for Diabetic Macular Edema.阈下红色(670纳米)与黄色(577纳米)微脉冲激光治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿的1年视力和解剖学结果比较
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2021 Oct 28;14(11):1100. doi: 10.3390/ph14111100.

本文引用的文献

1
Diabetic Macular Edema: Traditional and Novel Treatment.糖尿病性黄斑水肿:传统与新型治疗方法
Acta Clin Croat. 2017 Mar;56(1):124-132. doi: 10.20471/acc.2017.56.01.18.
2
Subthreshold diode micropulse laser versus conventional laser photocoagulation monotherapy or combined with anti-VEGF therapy for diabetic macular edema: A Bayesian network meta-analysis.亚阈值二极管微脉冲激光与传统激光光凝单药治疗或联合抗 VEGF 治疗糖尿病黄斑水肿的比较:贝叶斯网状 Meta 分析。
Biomed Pharmacother. 2018 Jan;97:293-299. doi: 10.1016/j.biopha.2017.10.078. Epub 2017 Nov 6.
3
Subthreshold micropulse laser reduces anti-VEGF injection burden in patients with diabetic macular edema.阈下微脉冲激光减轻糖尿病性黄斑水肿患者抗VEGF注射负担。
Eur J Ophthalmol. 2018 Jan;28(1):68-73. doi: 10.5301/ejo.5001000.
4
A Review of Subthreshold Micropulse Laser for Treatment of Macular Disorders.阈下微脉冲激光治疗黄斑疾病的综述
Adv Ther. 2017 Jul;34(7):1528-1555. doi: 10.1007/s12325-017-0559-y. Epub 2017 May 24.
5
Guidelines for the Management of Diabetic Macular Edema by the European Society of Retina Specialists (EURETINA).欧洲视网膜专家协会(EURETINA)糖尿病性黄斑水肿管理指南
Ophthalmologica. 2017;237(4):185-222. doi: 10.1159/000458539. Epub 2017 Apr 20.
6
A Review of Subthreshold Micropulse Laser and Recent Advances in Retinal Laser Technology.阈下微脉冲激光及视网膜激光技术最新进展综述
Ophthalmol Ther. 2017 Jun;6(1):1-6. doi: 10.1007/s40123-017-0077-7. Epub 2017 Feb 9.
7
Incidence and Growth of Geographic Atrophy during 5 Years of Comparison of Age-Related Macular Degeneration Treatments Trials.年龄相关性黄斑变性治疗试验5年比较期间地理萎缩的发病率和进展情况
Ophthalmology. 2017 Jan;124(1):97-104. doi: 10.1016/j.ophtha.2016.09.012. Epub 2016 Oct 27.
8
Aflibercept in diabetic macular edema: evaluating efficacy as a primary and secondary therapeutic option.阿柏西普治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿:评估其作为一线和二线治疗选择的疗效
Eye (Lond). 2017 Feb;31(2):342-345. doi: 10.1038/eye.2016.233. Epub 2016 Nov 4.
9
Short-term efficacy of subthreshold micropulse yellow laser (577-nm) photocoagulation for chronic central serous chorioretinopathy.阈下微脉冲黄光激光(577纳米)光凝治疗慢性中心性浆液性脉络膜视网膜病变的短期疗效
Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2015 Dec;253(12):2129-35. doi: 10.1007/s00417-015-2965-7. Epub 2015 Feb 26.
10
Aflibercept, bevacizumab, or ranibizumab for diabetic macular edema.阿柏西普、贝伐单抗或雷珠单抗治疗糖尿病性黄斑水肿。
N Engl J Med. 2015 Mar 26;372(13):1193-203. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1414264. Epub 2015 Feb 18.