Stratidaki Eirini, Mechili Enkeleint A, Ouzouni Christina, Patelarou Athina E, Savvakis Ioannis, Giakoumidakis Konstantinos, Laliotis Aggelos, Patelarou Evridiki
Department of Nursing, School of Health Sciences, Hellenic Mediterranean University, 71004 Heraklion, Crete, Greece.
Department of Healthcare, Faculty of Health, University of Vlora, 9401 Vlora, Albania.
Nutrients. 2024 Nov 21;16(23):3982. doi: 10.3390/nu16233982.
(1) Background: Frailty in older adults is a condition that involves an interaction of psychological, biological, and social factors. This study aimed to assess the frailty status of older adults (65 years old and above) who receive home care services. Additionally, this work aimed to explore the key factors that have a statistically significant impact on the frailty of this vulnerable population. (2) Methods: This study represents the first phase of an intervention trial involving individuals aged 65 and over who received primary healthcare services and resided in the municipality of Archanes-Asterousia in Crete, Greece. Frailty was assessed using the SHARE-Frailty Instrument, while nutritional status was evaluated with the Mini Nutritional Assessment. Diet-related factors were analyzed, including health factors (oral hygiene, depression, cognitive decline, impaired functioning, quality of life), social factors (educational attainment, marital status, type of work before the age of 60), and lifestyle factors (smoking, alcohol consumption, diet). (3) Results: A total of 730 older adults were evaluated (31.5% male), with an average age (±SD) of 76.83 (±6.68) years. The frailty status analysis revealed 108 (14.8%) to be frail, 249 (34.1%) to be pre-frail, and 373 (51.1%) to be non-frail. Statistically significant associations were found between the MNA and Barthel scores (rs = 0.822, < 0.001). Higher nutritional evaluations (MNA) were revealed in non-frail adults (mean (±SD); 26.97 ± 1.96) compared to pre-fail (mean (±SD); 19.37 ± 3.36) and frail adults (mean (±SD); 13.08 ± 3.16), as well as in pre-fail compared to frail adults (F = 1338.08, < 0.001). Functional independence (Barthel) significantly differed with the frailty status of older adults (H = 521.98, < 0.001; median for non-frail: 20.00, pre-fail: 19.00, frail adults: 15.00). (4) Conclusions: This study demonstrated that good nutritional status, good oral health, functional independence, and good quality of life are strongly correlated with lower frailty. Additionally, having chronic conditions is positively associated with one's frailty status. Educational programs for both healthcare personnel and older adults are recommended.
(1) 背景:老年人的衰弱是一种涉及心理、生物和社会因素相互作用的状况。本研究旨在评估接受居家护理服务的老年人(65岁及以上)的衰弱状况。此外,这项工作旨在探索对这一脆弱人群的衰弱有统计学显著影响的关键因素。(2) 方法:本研究是一项干预试验的第一阶段,涉及年龄在65岁及以上、接受初级医疗服务且居住在希腊克里特岛阿坎内斯 - 阿斯特罗西亚市的个体。使用SHARE - 衰弱量表评估衰弱状况,同时用简易营养评估法评估营养状况。分析了与饮食相关的因素,包括健康因素(口腔卫生、抑郁、认知衰退、功能受损、生活质量)、社会因素(教育程度、婚姻状况、60岁之前的工作类型)和生活方式因素(吸烟、饮酒、饮食)。(3) 结果:共评估了730名老年人(男性占31.5%),平均年龄(±标准差)为76.83(±6.68)岁。衰弱状况分析显示,108人(14.8%)为衰弱,249人(34.1%)为衰弱前期,373人(51.1%)为非衰弱。发现MNA和Barthel评分之间存在统计学显著关联(rs = 0.822,P < 0.001)。与衰弱前期(平均(±标准差);19.37 ± 3.36)和衰弱老年人(平均(±标准差);13.08 ± 3.16)相比,非衰弱成年人的营养评估得分更高(MNA,平均(±标准差);26.97 ± 1.96),而且衰弱前期成年人的得分高于衰弱成年人(F = 1338.08,P < 0.001)。老年人的功能独立性(Barthel评分)与衰弱状况有显著差异(H = 521.98,P < 0.001;非衰弱者的中位数为20.00,衰弱前期为19.00,衰弱成年人:15.00)。(4) 结论:本研究表明,良好的营养状况、良好的口腔健康、功能独立性和良好的生活质量与较低的衰弱程度密切相关。此外,患有慢性疾病与一个人的衰弱状况呈正相关。建议为医护人员和老年人开展教育项目。