Kannan Loganathan Prakash, Garg Anip, McNicol Robert, Wall Conor, Pointon Matthew, McMeekin Peter, Godfrey Alan, Wagner Michael, Roehr Charles Christoph
Neonatal Intensive Care Unit, The James Cook University Hospital, Middlesbrough TS4 3BW, UK.
Clinical Academic Office, Faculty of Medical Sciences, Newcastle University, Newcastle upon Tyne NE1 7RU, UK.
Children (Basel). 2024 Aug 21;11(8):1023. doi: 10.3390/children11081023.
Eye-tracking technology could be used to study human factors during teamwork.
This work aimed to compare the visual attention (VA) of a team member acting as both a team leader and managing the airway, compared to a team member performing the focused task of managing the airway in the presence of a dedicated team leader. This work also aimed to report differences in team performance, behavioural skills, and workload between the two groups using validated tools.
We conducted a simulation-based, pilot randomised controlled study. The participants included were volunteer paediatric trainees, nurse practitioners, and neonatal nurses. Three teams consisting of four team members were formed. Each team participated in two identical neonatal resuscitation simulation scenarios in a random order, once with and once without a team leader. Using a commercially available eye-tracking device, we analysed VA regarding attention to (1) a manikin, (2) a colleague, and (3) a monitor. Only the trainee who was the airway operator would wear eye-tracking glasses in both simulations.
In total, 6 simulation scenarios and 24 individual role allocations were analysed. Participants in a no-team-leader capacity had a greater number of total fixations on manikin and monitors, though this was not significant. There were no significant differences in team performance, behavioural skills, and individual workload. Physical demand was reported as significantly higher by participants in the group without a team leader. During debriefing, all the teams expressed their preference for having a dedicated team leader.
In our pilot study using low-cost technology, we could not demonstrate the difference in VA with the presence of a team leader.
眼动追踪技术可用于研究团队协作中的人为因素。
本研究旨在比较在担任团队领导者并同时管理气道的团队成员与在有专职团队领导者在场时专注于气道管理任务的团队成员之间的视觉注意力(VA)。本研究还旨在使用经过验证的工具报告两组之间在团队绩效、行为技能和工作量方面的差异。
我们进行了一项基于模拟的试点随机对照研究。纳入的参与者为儿科实习医生、执业护士和新生儿护士志愿者。组成了三个由四名团队成员组成的团队。每个团队以随机顺序参与两个相同的新生儿复苏模拟场景,一次有团队领导者,一次没有团队领导者。使用市售的眼动追踪设备,我们分析了对(1)人体模型、(2)同事和(3)监视器的视觉注意力。在两个模拟中,只有担任气道操作员的实习医生会佩戴眼动追踪眼镜。
总共分析了6个模拟场景和24个个体角色分配。在没有团队领导者的情况下,参与者对人体模型和监视器的总注视次数更多,尽管这并不显著。在团队绩效、行为技能和个人工作量方面没有显著差异。没有团队领导者的组中的参与者报告身体需求明显更高。在汇报过程中,所有团队都表示他们更喜欢有专职团队领导者。
在我们使用低成本技术的试点研究中,我们未能证明有团队领导者时视觉注意力的差异。