Ieong Loi, Ni Xindi, Xie Huisong, Liu Ye
School of Sport Science, Beijing Sport University, Beijing 100084, China.
School of Track and Field, Beijing Sport University, Beijing 100084, China.
Life (Basel). 2024 Jul 30;14(8):956. doi: 10.3390/life14080956.
Propulsive power is one of the factors that determine the performance of sprint cycling. Pedaling rate is related to power output, and stiffness is associated with improving performance in athletic tasks.
to investigate the relationship between musculoarticular stiffness and pedaling rate.
twenty-two healthy, untrained male volunteers (19 ± 2 years, 175 ± 6 cm, 74 ± 16 kg) were divided into two groups after their musculoarticular (MA) stiffness was tested, and these groups were the stiffness group (SG) and compliant group (CG). A 6-s maximal cycling test was conducted in four cycling modes, which were levels 5 and 10 air-resistance, and levels 3 and 7 magnetic-resistance. Peak and average cadence, peak power output (PO), crank force (CF), peak rate of crank force development (RCFD), and the angle of peak crank force were collected. The significance of differences between the two groups for these variables was assessed using an independent samples -test. Pearson product-moment correlations were calculated to analyze the relationship between MA stiffness and each performance variable.
the SG had significantly higher peak cadence and average cadence at level 3 magnetic-resistance, peak crank force, and peak power output at level 10 air-resistance, peak rate of crank force development at levels 5 air-resistance, 10 air-resistance, and 3 magnetic-resistance ( < 0.05). MA stiffness was significantly correlated with average cadence at levels 5 and 10 air-resistance, peak crank force in all 4 modes, and RCFD and peak power output at level 10 air-resistance. There were no significant relationships between MA stiffness and the angle of peak crank force in each cycling mode.
results indicate that participants with relatively higher MA stiffness seemed to have a higher pedaling rate during a 6-s sprint cycling in these conditions. They also performed a superior crank force and rate of crank force development, producing greater power output when sprint cycling. Optimizing cycling resistance or gear ratio to enhance both RCFD and musculotendinous stiffness may be crucial for improving sprint cycling performance.
推进力是决定短距离自行车骑行表现的因素之一。踏频与功率输出相关,而刚度与提高运动任务表现有关。
研究肌肉关节刚度与踏频之间的关系。
22名健康、未经训练的男性志愿者(19±2岁,身高175±6厘米,体重74±16千克)在测试其肌肉关节(MA)刚度后被分为两组,即刚度组(SG)和顺应组(CG)。在四种骑行模式下进行了6秒的最大骑行测试,分别是空气阻力5级和10级,以及磁阻力3级和7级。收集了峰值和平均踏频、峰值功率输出(PO)、曲柄力(CF)、曲柄力发展的峰值速率(RCFD)以及峰值曲柄力角度。使用独立样本t检验评估两组在这些变量上差异的显著性。计算皮尔逊积差相关系数以分析MA刚度与每个表现变量之间的关系。
刚度组在磁阻力3级时的峰值踏频和平均踏频显著更高,在空气阻力10级时的峰值曲柄力和峰值功率输出显著更高,在空气阻力5级、10级和磁阻力3级时的曲柄力发展峰值速率显著更高(P<0.05)。MA刚度与空气阻力5级和10级时的平均踏频、所有4种模式下的峰值曲柄力、空气阻力10级时的RCFD和峰值功率输出显著相关。在每种骑行模式下,MA刚度与峰值曲柄力角度之间均无显著关系。
结果表明,在这些条件下,MA刚度相对较高的参与者在6秒短距离自行车骑行过程中似乎具有更高的踏频。他们还表现出更好的曲柄力和曲柄力发展速率,在短距离自行车骑行时产生更大的功率输出。优化骑行阻力或传动比以提高RCFD和肌肉肌腱刚度可能对改善短距离自行车骑行表现至关重要。