Department of Social Cognition, Faculty of Psychology, Ruhr University Bochum.
Booth School of Business, University of Chicago.
J Exp Psychol Gen. 2024 Oct;153(10):2454-2469. doi: 10.1037/xge0001643. Epub 2024 Aug 29.
People see societal groups as less moral, warm, and likable if their ideology is more dissimilar to the ideology of the self (i.e., ideological prejudice). We contribute to the debate on whether ideological prejudice in the United States is stronger in conservatives, progressives, or neither. Investigating the American National Election Studies, we found that between 1972 and 2021, ideological prejudice was stronger in conservatives. However, investigating studies conducted to develop the agency-beliefs-communion model, we found that between 2016 and 2021, ideological prejudice was stronger in progressives. We report various analyses of both research programs and two new studies that rule out several explanations for this contradiction. Additional analytic and experimental evidence suggests that political rule (vs. opposition) may explain the robust heterogeneity in asymmetric ideological prejudice. Ideological prejudice shifted toward being stronger in conservatives when the United States was governed by Democrats and toward being stronger in progressives when the United States was governed by Republicans. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
如果一个社会群体的意识形态与自我的意识形态(即意识形态偏见)差异较大,人们会认为该群体的道德、温暖和可爱程度较低。我们探讨了美国的保守派、进步派或两者都没有更强的意识形态偏见的问题。通过研究美国全国选举研究,我们发现,1972 年至 2021 年间,保守派的意识形态偏见更强。然而,通过研究为发展机构信仰共同体模型而进行的研究,我们发现,2016 年至 2021 年间,进步派的意识形态偏见更强。我们报告了对这两个研究项目的各种分析,以及两项排除了这种矛盾的几种解释的新研究。其他分析和实验证据表明,政治统治(而不是反对派)可能解释了不对称意识形态偏见的显著异质性。当美国由民主党人执政时,保守派的意识形态偏见会增强;当美国由共和党人执政时,进步派的意识形态偏见会增强。